ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110000162
Applicant Name: ????? So I spkoe (sic) with my squad leader to see what documents I needed to bring to my next drill and @ the Jan. drill I brought my pregnancy profile and proof of pregnancy as I was told. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110000245
Applicant Name: ????? On 8 April 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110000368
Applicant Name: ????? On 13 June 2007, the separation approving authority approved the findings and recommendations of the administrative separation board and directed that the applicant be discharged from the Army under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 3 January 2011.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110000387
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110000411
Applicant Name: ????? On 27 April 2010, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110000419
Applicant Name: ????? On 21 October 2002, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110000426
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 5 April 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to adapt to military life, refusal to participate in training, lack of motivation, and stated that he quit, with an uncharacterized discharge. The applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110000439
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 25 August 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c (2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, abuse of illegal drugs; in that he wrongfully used marijuana between (030427-030527), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 26...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110000454
Applicant Name: ????? On 9 June 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110000503
Applicant Name: ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge. The analyst noted the applicant's issue that he wants the chance to reenlist and make something of his life.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110000528
Applicant Name: ????? On 20 July 2000, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. On 16 August 2000, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110000532
On 18 February 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with an uncharacterized separation of service. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "misconduct (Drug Abuse) and the separation code is "JKK," with an uncharacterized discharge if a Soldier is in an entry level status. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110000704
Current ENL Service: 3 Yrs, 11 Mos, 21 Days The applicant has a period of lost time that was not annotated on the DD Form 214 block 29; however, the DA Form 2-1 block 21, DD Form 2329 (Summary Court-Martial) and the unit commander's recommendation for separation indicates that the applicant was sentenced to a period of military confinement, which adjusted his ETS date. On 1 June 1999, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110000750
The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 3 January 2011. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110000765
Applicant Name: ????? Also, the Legal Action Request Form block 14; indicates the applicant received an Article 15; however, the document is not part of the available record. The unit commander recommended separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110000866
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5, AR 635-200, paragraph 5-17 by reason of a physical condition, not a disability, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 3 January 2011.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110000898
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander's reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The analyst noted the applicant's issue that he was found not guilty, but was still given a discharge that kept him from his GI Bill and any other Veteran Benefits and he had served 9 months in Iraq.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110000980
On 30 August 2001, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an Administrative Separation Board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 24 September 2001, the separation authority approved the conditional waiver request, waived further rehabilitative efforts and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110000981
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 January 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he wrongfully used marijuana, violated a lawful general regulation, disobeyed a lawful order from a noncommissioned officer, and disrespectful in deportment towards a noncommissioned officer; in which...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110001023
Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Furthermore, notwithstanding the propriety of the applicant's discharge, the analyst found that someone in the discharge process erroneously entered on the applicant's DD Form 214, block 27, re-entry code as 3. In...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110001154
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 060519 Discharge Received: Date: 060609 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: HQ & HQ Company, 46th AG Battalion, (Reception), Fort Knox, KY Time Lost: AWOL x 1 from (060225-060430) for 65 days. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110001372
Applicant Name: ????? Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 7 September 2010. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110001487
Applicant Name: ????? He is asking the Review Board to take into consideration his request to change his characterization of service to honorable. On 14 June 2004, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and that he was being separated for unsatisfactory performance under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110001512
On 29 April 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 10 January 2011. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: The Board voted to administratively change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110001520
Applicant Name: ????? AWOL from (040927-041025) for 29 days. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was more than two days late, but was charged with two periods of AWOL totaling 36 days of lost time, to include other acts of misconduct.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110001536
Applicant Name: ????? On 11 April 2001, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived his right to an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 12 April 2001, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110001540
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110001544
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 3 April 2007, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and entered into a pre-trial greeement: offer to plead guilty and in the event the command sought to administratively separate him under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, the separation authority agreed that any separation would be characterized as no less favorable than a general, under honorable conditons, which agreement was accepted by the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110001574
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 6 February 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he wrongfully used cocaine between (021015-021115), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 6 February 2003, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110001610
Applicant Name: ????? Current ENL Service: 0 Yrs, 2 Mos, 21 Days The net active service this period on the DD Form 214, block 12c is incorrect; should be as annotated above for the current period of service under review. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110001611
Applicant Name: ????? On 9 September 2009, the separation authority directed that the applicants be discharged from the Army with an uncharacterized separation of service. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110001690
The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110001717
Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander recommended separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 8 April 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110001882
Applicant Name: ????? The burden of proof remains with the applicant to provide the appropriate documents or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board's consideration. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110001974
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 19 August 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of Pattern of Misconduct, for being arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol (100613), lying to a Non Commissioned Officer x 2 (100304 and 100331), being negligent with Army property (100331), and FTR on multiple occasions, with a general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110001983
Applicant Name: ????? Current ENL Service: 5 Yrs, 03Mos, 04Days Retained in service 492 days for the convenience of the govt. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110002157
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 080908 Discharge Received: Date: 081017 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: Company E, 2nd Battalion, 19th Infantry Regiment, Fort Benning, GA Time Lost: AWOL x 1 from 080201-080717) for 166 days. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110002279
Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander recommended separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110002321
It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 20 January 2011. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110002384
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 30 May 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he abused illegal drugs, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110002386
Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110002415
Applicant Name: ????? The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse) and the separation code is "JKK." Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110002482
Applicant Name: ????? On 1 April 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. On 6 April 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110002493
On 3 April 2003, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: The Board voted to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110002516
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 16 December 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct a pattern of misconduct in that he failed to report to duty on time, disobeyed a noncommissioned officer; as well as commissioned officers, made false official statements and larceny, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 19 December 2003, the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110002518
Applicant Name: ????? On 20 November 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110002559
On 23 January 2002, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 24 January 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110002721
Applicant Name: ????? The evidence of record further shows that the unit commander retracted his recommendation for separation with a general discharge and submitted a memorandum recommending that the applicant be retained on active duty. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110002730
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 081029 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: F Company, 3/34th Infantry Regiment, Fort Jackson, SC Time Lost: AWOL x 1 from (080512-080625) for 44 days. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110002742
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that his discharge was inequitable because it was based on one isolated incident in 68 months and 17 days of service with no other adverse action. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions...