Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2011/07/25 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that when he was in the 30th AG, he got a red cross message that his father was in critical condition and there was no one else physically capable of taking care of him. His father was left with brain damage; however, he is a lot better now. The applicant further states that at the time he was depressed and made it known that he had no desire to continue with his training until his father was better.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 061204
Discharge Received: Date: 061212 Chapter: 5-17 AR: 635-200
Reason: Condition, Not a Disability RE: SPD: JFV Unit/Location: Company A, 30th Adjutant General Battalion (Reception), Fort Benning, GA
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 24
Current ENL Date: 060713 Current ENL Term: 3 Years The applicant required a medical waiver at the time of enlistment, which was approved on (060609).
Current ENL Service: 0 Yrs, 5 Mos, 0 Days ?????
Total Service: 0 Yrs, 5 Mos, 0 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-4 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: None GT: 127 EDU: Coll Grad Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
On 4 December 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition for being diagnosed by competent medical authority with an adjustment disorder with depressed mood, related continuing deficiencies in conduct, and performance as follows; difficulty sleeping, crying, breathing problems and decreased appetite which were incompatible with military service and recommended the applicants discharge with an entry level uncharacterized separation of service. He was advised of his rights.
On 4 December 2006, the applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Service. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an uncharacterized discharge.
On 8 December 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with an uncharacterized separation of service.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 5-17 specifically provides that a Soldier may be separated for other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability under Army Regulation 635-40, which interferes with assignment to or performance of duty. The regulation requires that the condition interferes with the Soldiers ability to perform duty, and requires that the diagnosis be so severe that the Soldiers ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status. A general, under honorable conditions discharge is normally inappropriate for individuals separated under the provisions of Chapter 5-17 unless properly notified of the specific factors in the service that warrant such characterization.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records, documents and the issue and documents he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
The evidence of record shows the applicant while in training status was diagnosed by competent medical authority with an adjustment disorder with depressed mood, related continuing deficiencies in conduct, and performance as follows; difficulty sleeping, crying, breathing problems and decreased appetite and the diagnosis was so severe that the former Soldiers ability to function in the military environment was significantly impaired.
The applicants service was uncharacterized because he was in an entry-level status. A Soldier is in entry-level status (ELS) for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. The purpose of the entry-level status is to provide the Soldier a probationary period. Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldiers service will be uncharacterized when the separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status.
The analyst noted the applicant's issue requesting that his discharge be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions. However, a general, under honorable conditions discharge is not authorized under ELS conditions. Further, the analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and that the rights of the applicant were fully protected through the separation process.
The applicant further contends that he is entitled to an upgrade of his discharge because of mitigating circumstances which contributed to his misconduct. Specifically, he claims his fathers illness at home resulted in his discharge. While the applicant may believe his fathers illness at home was the underlying cause of his misconduct, the record of evidence does not demonstrate that he sought relief from this situation through his command or the numerous Army community services like the Chaplain, Army Community and Family Support Services, Community Counseling Center, and other medical resources available to all Soldiers. Likewise, he has provided no evidence that he should not be held responsible for his misconduct.
In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 1 February 2012 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: None
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 14 July 2011.
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
Board Vote:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
X. Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change
XI. Certification Signature
Approval Authority:
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board
BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder
?????
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20110015236
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090013364
Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: nA RE Code: Grade...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100007950
Applicant Name: ????? On 19 March 2009, the intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an uncharacterized discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110018739
Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander recommended the applicants separation from the Army with an uncharacterized discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090009108
Applicant Name: ????? On 4 February 2009, the intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an uncharacterized discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110009555
Applicant Name: ????? He states two days prior to his discharge, the doctor he saw informed him that he did have a great deal of injury to his back that needed to be corrected, which meant more time under medical care and probably months to cure his back. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst noted from the evidence of record that the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010455
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The analyst recommends to the Board that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service remain both proper and equitable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080011254
Applicant Name: ????? Army policy states that the service of personnel separated under this paragraph will be characterized as honorable, general, under honorable conditions, or uncharacterized if in entry-level status. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110020937
Applicant Name: ????? The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100010325
Applicant Name: ????? On 15 March 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be discharged with an uncharacterized separation of service. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: The Board directs Army Review Boards Agency Case Management Division (CMD) to correct block 27 to reflect Reentry Eligibility Code 3; and issue a new DD...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015810
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 31 May 2005, after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examinations, the Physical Evaluation Board (EPSB) found that the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards and in the opinion of the evaluating physicians the conditions(s) existed prior to service. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a soldier is in an entry-level status if the...