ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011328
Applicant Name: ????? On 6 December 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The analyst carefully examined the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011331
The DD Form 214, indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-drug abuse, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Therefore, based on the available evidence, the analyst presumes government regularity in the discharge process and concludes that based on the DD Form 214, the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011426
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant requests that his narrative reason for separation be changed. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial", the separation code is "KFS", and the reentry code is "RE 3" and the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011427
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Furthermore, the applicant states he was not given the same rights as other Soldiers in his company.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011519
Applicant Name: ????? On 1 July 2010, the separation authority approved the findings and recommendations of the board; waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011521
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011570
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant met with Defense Counsel several times and did not respond in the 7 duty days; therefore, he waived his rights of the notification memorandum. Accordingly, the analyst recommends to the Board that the narrative reason for separation on the DD Form 214 be changed to "Physical Standards" with the corresponding separation code of "JFT."
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011572
Applicant Name: ????? On 2 October 2010, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Official: BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder Legend: AWOL...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011577
Current ENL Service: 04 Yrs, 11Mos, 10Days Includes 799 days of excess leave (051103-080110) Total Service: 04 Yrs, 11Mos, 10Days ????? The evidence of record indicates the applicant was adjudged guilty by a court-martial and that the sentence was approved by the convening authority. After a thorough review of the applicants records and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no cause for clemency and therefore recommends to the Board to deny clemency.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011589
A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the Soldiers initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have permanently or temporarily disqualified the Soldier for entry into the military service had it been detected at that time, and the medical condition does not disqualify the Soldier from retention in the service under the provisions of Army Regulation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011633
Applicant Name: ????? On 11 January 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011656
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 29 April 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductfor wrongful use of a controlled substance (Marijuana) and a civil conviction, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011687
Applicant Name: ????? On 9 December 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants separation from the Army with an uncharacterized discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldiers service will be uncharacterized when the separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011692
Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status. A Soldier is in entry-level status (ELS) for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011722
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 22 September 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he went AWOL from (090501-090709), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The analyst carefully examined the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011782
Applicant Name: ????? The separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Accordingly, the analyst recommends to the Board that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011866
Applicant Name: ????? On 14 June 2010, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The Army Discharge Review Board is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011892
Applicant Name: ????? On 4 February 2010, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and requested consideration of her case by an administrative separation board. On 8 June 2010, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board to discharge the applicant, but disapproved the recommendation to suspend the discharge and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011904
Applicant Name: ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011913
Applicant Name: ????? On 14 November 2003 the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived his right to an administrative separation board, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. On 24 December 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of an under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011955
The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of KFS (i.e., in lieu of trial by court-martial) with a reentry eligibility (RE) code of 4. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 22 May 2011.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011980
Applicant Name: ????? On 15 July 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 17 July 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012065
Applicant Name: ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. By the misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012068
Applicant Name: ????? On 4 October 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issued and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012085
Applicant Name: ????? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants available military records and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicants discharge. The burden of proof remains with the former Soldier to provide the appropriate documents or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012111
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012119
The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct-serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012124
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 25 May 2011 and a copy of his DD Form 214 for the period of service ending 31 October 2003.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012127
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 14 March 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c (2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs; in that he wrongfully used cocaine between (110212-110215), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 16 March 2011, the applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012195
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 19 March 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense for having wrongfully used marijuana between (070113 and 070213), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The analyst noted the applicant's issues of wanting to get back into the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012199
Applicant Name: ????? Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 5 June 2011.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012200
Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander recommended separation from the Army with an uncharacterized discharge. On 1 April 2010, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012212
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he requests an upgrade of his discharge to general, under honorable conditions. However, at the time of discharge, the applicant received an under other than honorable conditions discharge which constitutes a non-waiverable disqualification, thus the applicant is no longer eligible to reenlist.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012492
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 25 November 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failing to adapt to military life with an uncharacterized discharge. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012497
On 15 January 2004, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, even though he was not entitled to such a board, contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012520
Applicant Name: ????? Application Receipt Date: 2011/06/13 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012646
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012691
Applicant Name: ???? By abusing illegal drugs, he knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012707
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board and submitted a statement in his own behalf. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012711
The unit commander recommended separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 23 November 2004, the separation authority waived the applicant's rights to an administrative separation board and further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012738
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 9 November 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Accordingly, the analyst recommends to the board that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012753
Applicant Name: ????? On 9 September 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 16 May 2010.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012887
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 4 August 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he was found guilty by a Summary Court-Martail held on (090416) of possessing an unknown quantity of marijuana on or about (081101-090116) and wrongfully distributing approximately 14.4 grams of marijuana (081219), with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012940
Further, the DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct, serious offense with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012941
The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge as entry-level status, with the description of service as uncharacterized. Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110013038
Applicant Name: ??? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Serious Offense)", and the separation code is "JKQ."
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110013070
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110013123
On 25 March 2003, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110013261
Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander recommended separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 1 July 2001, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110013268
The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the...