Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110013838
Original file (AR20110013838.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2011/07/01	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that his ex-wife took everything he had and ran off with his two children and as a result he went AWOL to find them.  He was punished  with extra duty and thinks that he should have received an honorable because he completed all of his punishment that was given to him and feels that he has earned an honorable discharge.  He has not been in any trouble at all out of 5 years in the military and just to be kicked out like that while it was other Soldiers in the brigade that popped hot and they still reside in the US Army do not see any justice in that he loved to soldier its unfair.  

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: NIF
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 110513   Chapter: 14-12c       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Serious Offense)	   RE:     SPD: JKQ   Unit/Location: A Company, 4th Battalion, 70th AR, APO, AE 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  22
Current ENL Date: Reenl/100301    Current ENL Term: 2 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	1 Yrs, 2 Mos, 13 Days ?????
Total Service:  		5 Yrs, 4 Mos, 11 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	ARNG 060103-060704/NA
                                       ADT    060705-061116/HD
                                       ARNG 061117-070508/GD
                                       USARCG 070509-080116/GD
                                       RA       080117-100301/HD
Highest Grade: E-5		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 19K10 M1 Armor Crewman   GT: 83   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Southwest Asia   Combat: Iraq (080407-090527)
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, AAM, ICMDLw/2 CS, GCMDL, NDSM, GWOTSM, NCOPDR, MUC, ASR, OSR, CAB

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.





VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to the discharge from the Army.  However, the record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant’s signature.  
       
       The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.  
       
       Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKQ (i.e., misconduct- serious offense) with a reentry eligibility (RE) code of "3."   

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s available military records, the issue and document submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant’s discharge.  
       
       The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to the applicant's discharge from the Army.  However, the applicant’s record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant's signature.  This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and the analyst presumed government regularity in the discharge process.  
       
       The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.  Barring evidence to the contrary, the analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  
       
       The applicant's contentions were carefully considered.  However, the analyst is unable to determine whether these contentions have merit because the facts and circumstances leading to the discharge are unknown.  The burden of proof remains with the former Soldier to provide the appropriate documents or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board's consideration. 
       
       If the applicant desires a personal appearance hearing, it will still be his responsibility to meet the burden of proof since the evidence is not available in the official record.
       
       Therefore, based on the available evidence, the analyst presumes government regularity in the discharge process and determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
       
       
       
       
       

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 13 January 2012         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 15 June 2011, DD Form 256, dated 1 December 2010, DA Form 5689 dated 2 December 2010, DA Form 1059 dated 22 November 2010, Orders dated 3 May 2009, DA Form 4980 dated 6 June 2009, Orders dated 27 September 2010.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. 
        
IX.  Board Decision						
Board Vote:
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)

X.  Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to: 
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change

XI.  Certification Signature
Approval Authority:



EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board



BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder
????



Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20110013838
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007201

    Original file (AR20120007201.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 18 March 2010, the separation authority directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Further, notwithstanding the propriety of the applicant's discharge and on the basis of equity, the Board voted to change the applicant’s reason for discharge, authority, separation code, and reentry code.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009503

    Original file (AR20120009503.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 1 March 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense, for being convicted by a special court-martial of assaulting his wife and another Soldier and disobeying a lawful order from a commissioned officer, with a general, under honorable conditions...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005880

    Original file (AR20120005880.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 20 July 2010, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, and requested that his case be heard before an administrative separation board. The evidence of record shows that the applicant consulted with legal counsel and requested consideration of his case by an administrative separation board and had 6 years of total active and reserve military service at the time of initiation of separation action.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003196

    Original file (AR20120003196.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 2 November 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110014430

    Original file (AR20110014430.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant, states in effect, that his service was excellent, he received a CIB for his service in Afghanistan and two ARCOMs, one of which was for valor. On 9 February 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100011010

    Original file (AR20100011010.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he believes his discharge was other than honorable, and that it would turn honorable after six months and he doesn't believe it was. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100007524

    Original file (AR20100007524.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct-serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100029326

    Original file (AR20100029326.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110020454

    Original file (AR20110020454.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 7 February 2011, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100016054

    Original file (AR20100016054.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Serious Offense)", the separation code is "JKQ", and the reentry code should have been "RE 3". However, notwithstanding the propriety of the applicant's discharge, the analyst found that someone in the discharge process erroneously entered on the applicant's DD Form 214, block 27, re-entry code as “4.” In view of the foregoing, the analyst recommends to the Board that an administrative...