Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015496
Original file (AR20110015496.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2011/07/29	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, "The reason why my discharge needs to be changed is because it is the one thing that is holding me back for becoming a police officer. The specific department will not hiring me with this type of discharge. The county I live in also wont hire me with a discharge of this type. Im trying to become a police officer, and Im hoping to get this situtation taken care of."

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 080308
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 080318   Chapter: 11       AR: 635-200
Reason: Entry Level Performance and Conduct	   RE:     SPD: JGA   Unit/Location: Charlie Battery, 95th AG Battalion, Fort Sill, OK 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  20
Current ENL Date: 080109    Current ENL Term: 3 Years  32 weeks
Current ENL Service: 	0 Yrs, 2 Mos, 10 Days ?????
Total Service:  		0 Yrs, 2 Mos, 10 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-2		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: None   GT: 108   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: None

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 8 March 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failing to maintain the standards required of a Soldier in basic combat training; he missed several training events and failing to have the motivation to complete them. 
       
       He were referred to Community Mental Health Services (CMHS) after being seen cutting on his arm and they agreed that he did not have the emotional stability to complete training and recommended his discharge from the Army.  The unit commander recommended separation with an uncharacterized discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  
       
       On 8 March 2008, the applicant waived his right to consult with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval with an uncharacterized discharge.  
       
       On 13 March 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s separation from the Army with an uncharacterized discharge.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 11, of this regulation, in pertinent part, states that a member may be separated for unsatisfactory performance, conduct, or both, while in an entry level status.  This provision of the regulation applies to Soldiers who can not meet the minimum standards for training, have demonstrated that they are not qualified for retention because they can not adapt socially or emotionally to military life or because they lack the aptitude, ability, motivation or self discipline for military service, or they have demonstrated characteristics not compatible with satisfactory continued military service.  The regulation requires an uncharacterized discharge for separation under this Chapter.

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge as entry-level status, with the description of service as uncharacterized.  Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.  The purpose of the entry-level status is to provide the Soldier a probationary period.  Soldiers who are found to lack the necessary motivation, adaptability, self-discipline, ability, or attitude to become productive Soldiers may be expeditiously separated while in entry-level status.  
       
       Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldier’s service will be uncharacterized when the separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status.  The analyst noted the applicant's issue requesting that his discharge be upgraded to honorable so that he can become a police officer.  The analyst considered the applicant’s quality of service during the initial portion of the enlistment under review. 
       
       However, this service was determined not to be sufficiently meritorious to warrant an upgrade to the characterization of discharge.  Further, a fully honorable discharge may be granted only in cases which are clearly warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct and/or performance of duty.  The analyst determined no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicant’s record and the former Soldier’s service did not warrant an honorable discharge.  
       
       Additionally, the Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of gaining employment or enhancing employment opportunities.  The applicant further request that his narrative reason for separation be changed.  The narrative reason for separation is governed by specific directives.  The applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200.  The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Entry Level Performance and Conduct)", the separation code is "JGA", and the reentry code is "RE 3". 
       
       Army Regulation 635-5, Separation Documents, governs preparation of the DD Form 214 and dictates that entry of the narrative reason for separation, entered in block 28, separation code, entered in block 26, and RE Code, entered in block 27 of the form, will be entered exactly as listed in tables 2-2 or 2-3 of AR 635-5-1, Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes.  The regulation further stipulates that no deviation is authorized.  There is no provision for any other reason to be entered under this regulation. 
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 6 January 2012         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: Online application dated 23 July 2011.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. 
        
IX.  Board Decision						
Board Vote:
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)

X.  Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to: 
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change

XI.  Certification Signature
Approval Authority:




EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board




BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder
?????



Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20110015496
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100018646

    Original file (AR20100018646.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that his discharge is hurting his opportunities in law enforcement. The applicant’s statements alone do not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity and he has not provided any documentation or further evidence in support of his request for an upgrade of his discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090007735

    Original file (AR20090007735.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 31 January 1996, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be separated from the Army with an uncharacterized discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst noted from the evidence of record that the applicant received an uncharacterized separation while in an entry-level status (ELS). The analyst...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080003649

    Original file (AR20080003649.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct with an uncharacterized separation of service. Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a soldier’s service will be uncharacterized when his separation is initiated while the soldier is in entry level status. Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012172

    Original file (20090012172.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 080603 Discharge Received: Date: 080611 Chapter: 11 AR: 635-200 Reason: Entry Level Performance and Conduct RE: SPD: JGA Unit/Location: B Co, 1/34 Inf, Ft. Jackson, SC Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 3 June 2008, the unit commander...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012172

    Original file (AR20090012172.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 080603 Discharge Received: Date: 080611 Chapter: 11 AR: 635-200 Reason: Entry Level Performance and Conduct RE: SPD: JGA Unit/Location: B Co, 1/34 Inf, Ft. Jackson, SC Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 3 June 2008, the unit commander...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012262

    Original file (AR20060012262.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that on 24 October 1994, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct (she was diagnosed as having an adjustment disorder with depressed mood), with an uncharacterized discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records for the period of enlistment under review,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080016149

    Original file (AR20080016149.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080007957

    Original file (AR20080007957.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 October 1998, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to adapt socially and emptionally to military life, with an uncharacterized discharge. Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issue requesting that his narrative reason for separation be changed to medical reasons; however, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080019222

    Original file (AR20080019222.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 23 August 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11-3a, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for his inability to adapt to military standards, refusal to train, and for the lack of motivation, respect, and discipline to become a quality Soldier, with an uncharacterized discharge. Furthermore, the analyst noted that applicant's...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010212

    Original file (AR20060010212.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct with an uncharacterized separation of service. The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicant’s record and his service did not warrant an honorable discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E....