Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110014650
Original file (AR20110014650.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2010/07/18	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that his discharge was based on one incident within seventy four months of active duty service with no other drug related incidents.   

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: NIF
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 101124   Chapter: 14-12c (2)       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse)	   RE:     SPD: JKK   Unit/Location: D Troop, 5th Squadron, 15th Cavalry Regiment, 194th Armored Brigade, Fort Knox, KY 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 100720, wrongfully used cocaine between (100509-100609), reduction to Specialist (E-4), forfeiture of $1,099.00 pay per month for two months, suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before (110116), extra duty and restriction for 45 days (FG).  

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  20
Current ENL Date: Reenl/061030    Current ENL Term: 6 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	4 Yrs, 0 Mos, 25 Days ?????
Total Service:  		6 Yrs, 3 Mos, 13 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	USAR 040812-040907/NA
                                       RA      040908-061029/HD
Highest Grade: E-5		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 19D28 R4 Cavalry Scout   GT: NIF   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Southwest Asia   Combat: Iraq (051128-061119), Afghanistan (080318-090314)
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM (2), VUA, GCMDL, NDSM, AFCMDLw/2 CS, GWOTSM, ICMDLw/CS (2), ASR (2), CAB, 

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to the discharge from the Army.  However, the record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant’s signature.  
       
       The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2) by reason of misconduct with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.  
       
       Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKK (i.e., misconduct-drug abuse) with a reentry eligibility (RE) code of "4."  On 8 November 2010, DA, US Army Installation Management Command, Headquarters, US Army Garrison Command, Fort Knox, KY issued Orders 312-0162 discharging the applicant from the Regular Army with an effective date of; 24 November 2010.  

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s available military records and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant’s discharge.  
       
       The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to the applicant's discharge from the Army.  However, the applicant’s record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant's signature.  This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and the analyst presumed government regularity in the discharge process.  
       
       The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c (2) by reason of misconduct-drug abuse, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.  Barring evidence to the contrary, the analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  
       
       The analyst noted the applicant issue that his discharge was based on one incident within seventy four months of active duty service with no other drug related incidents.  Even though the applicant claims it was a single incident, the analyst concluded that the discrediting entry constituted a departure from the standards of conduct expected of Soldiers in the Army.  The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization. 
       
       Having examined all the available circumstances, the analyst determined that the incident of misconduct in the available record did indeed adversely affect the quality of service, brought discredit on the Army, and was prejudicial to good order and discipline.  This incident of misconduct clearly diminished the quality of the applicant's service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  Further, the burden of proof remains with the applicant to provide the appropriate documents or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board's consideration.  If the applicant desires a personal appearance hearing, it will still be his responsibility to meet the burden of proof since the evidence is not available in the official record.  
       
       Therefore, based on the available evidence, the analyst presumes government regularity in the discharge process and determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
       
       
       
       

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 27 January 2012         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 13 July 2011.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. 
        
IX.  Board Decision						
Board Vote:
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)

X.  Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to: 
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change

XI.  Certification Signature
Approval Authority:




EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board




BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder
?????



Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20110014650
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011331

    Original file (AR20110011331.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214, indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-drug abuse, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Therefore, based on the available evidence, the analyst presumes government regularity in the discharge process and concludes that based on the DD Form 214, the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100027115

    Original file (AR20100027115.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization. Yes No Counsel: NA Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, dated (101028); and a DD Form 214, dated (100824).

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021866

    Original file (AR20120021866.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2) by reason of misconduct (drug abuse), with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct-drug abuse, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicable Army...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007921

    Original file (AR20120007921.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 4 June 1998, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, for committing an assault upon Mrs. KA, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The analyst noted the applicant’s contentions of racism and being picked out by his chain of command;...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000480

    Original file (AR20100000480.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-drug abuse, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014200

    Original file (AR20100014200.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 July 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense for testing positive for cocaine and marijuana (090528), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090002434

    Original file (AR20090002434.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 149 in lieu of DD Form 293 submitted by the applicant. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c(2) by reason of misconduct, drug abuse with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c(2)...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110025154

    Original file (AR20110025154.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he requests an upgrade to his discharge to honorable and change the RE code to allow him to reenter the military. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c (2) by reason of misconduct (Drug Abuse), with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers:...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014317

    Original file (AR20100014317.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024225

    Original file (AR20110024225.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 27 October 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, for being disrespectful in language and deportment toward a NCO (100507) and testing positive for Oxycodone, a Schedule II controlled substance (100525), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 16...