ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058926C070421
The applicant states that his application for enrollment in the RRMIIP was submitted within the allotted timeframe and the benefits were not granted. The RRMIIP Program Manager further states, in effect, that although the application does not include a letter stating why he was not briefed during the initial enrollment period, the 35 th Signal Battalion Yauco, Puerto Rico manifest shows that the applicant was in the unit and on orders. Given the evidence of record, including the advisory...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058930C070421
The applicant states that his application for enrollment in the RRMIIP was submitted within the allotted timeframe and the benefits were not granted. In support of his appeal he submits a copy of his RRMIIP enrollment packet dated 26 January 1997. Personnel who enlisted in a Troop Program Unit after the initial enrollment period were required to be briefed on the program within 60 days of arrival in the unit and had 60 days after being briefed to enroll or decline.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058935C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. On an unknown date but...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058936C070421
The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows that on 8 February 1966, he was honorably released from active duty after having completed 2 years, 11 months, and 21 days of active military service. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the AGCM is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. In addition, the evidence of record confirms that the applicant served a qualifying...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058937C070421
The applicant’s military records were not available to the Board for review. A review of the available evidence confirms that the applicant was separated from active duty on 17 November 1947, after completing 1 year, 6 months, and 1 day of active military service. Therefore, the Board concludes it would be appropriate to correct his record to show his enlistment date and date of entry into active service was 16 May 1946.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058938C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The evidence of record shows that on 6 June 1996, when the SF 88 was completed, the applicant and his mother live at ___ Norman, OK.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058939C070421
The evidence of record shows that he was examined by competent military medical (psychiatric) authorities and diagnosed with Personality Disorder. He had no record of disciplinary action, he had been awarded four personal decorations during his period of service, he received an honorable characterization of service upon his discharge, and there is no evidence that he was considered for but disqualified for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. That all of the Department of the Army records...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058956C070421
The applicant states that his application for enrollment in the RRMIIP was submitted within the allotted timeframe and the benefits were not granted. Personnel who enlisted in a Troop Program Unit after the initial enrollment period were required to be briefed on the program within 60 days of arrival in the unit and had 60 days after being briefed to enroll or decline. Given the evidence of record, including the advisory opinion obtained from the RRMIIP Program Manager, the Board is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058957C070421
The applicant states that his application for enrollment in the RRMIIP was submitted within the allotted timeframe and the benefits were not granted. Personnel who enlisted in a Troop Program Unit after the initial enrollment period were required to be briefed on the program within 60 days of arrival in the unit and had 60 days after being briefed to enroll or decline. Given the evidence of record, including the advisory opinion obtained from the RRMIIP Program Manager, the Board is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058963C070421
The applicant states, through counsel, that he and three fellow soldiers were convicted by a general court-martial on 28 March 1948. The applicant's counsel states that this Board has the authority to set aside court-martial convictions under the old Articles of War (convictions prior to 5 May 1950). All four soldiers were tried together by a General Court-Martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058970C070421
The applicant’s military records show that on 28 October 1964, he enlisted in the Army for 3 years in the pay grade of E-1. Army Regulation 600-8-22 further provides that the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. 5 In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058971C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 29 April 1945 and the Bronze Star Medal. That the applicant’s Report of Separation, WD AGO 53-55 be amended to add the Purple Heart and the Bronze Star...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058972C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058974C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. WD AGO Form 106 shows that on 21 April 1946 the applicant submitted a claim to The Adjutant General for the Purple Heart on the basis that he “was wounded in the left hand. Rating decision papers from the VA show that the applicant was awarded disability as a result of a gunshot wound of the left hand which was determined to have been incurred in service during World War II.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058975C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058976C070421
APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that a 28 March 1952 letter from the FSM’s division commander substantiates that he was entitled to the Combat Infantryman Badge. The submitted letter is new evidence that requires Board consideration. DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058979C070421
His records contain no evidence that he was wounded in action. The applicant previously applied to the Board for an award of the Purple Heart and the Board denied his request on 12 September 2000 because there was no evidence to show that he had in fact been wounded. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in Vietnam on 5 April 1969, the RVNGC w/Palm...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058980C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant’s military records were not available to the Board for review. By regulation, in order to support an award of a PH a member must have been wounded or injured in action, must have been treated for this wound or injury by military medical personnel, and this treatment must have been made a matter...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058981C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected to show that he was awarded the Silver Star, the Bronze Star Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), the Distinguished Unit Badge (now known as the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC)) and the Belgium Fouragere. The opinion does note that the exigencies of combat may require non-infantry soldiers to temporarily perform the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058982C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for former spouse coverage. The divorce decree awarded the applicant a portion of the FSM’s retired pay (based upon 15 years of marriage); it did not award her the SBP.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058983C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He also indicated that he understood that he was required to report to the State Director of Selective Service within 15 days of discharge for performance of alternate service and that upon satisfactory completion of such service he would be issued a Clemency Discharge Certificate and that the certificate did not alter his ineligibility for benefits The last group could...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058984C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. When the applicant’s original application was received by the Board, his spouse’s concurrence was not provided. Members retired for more than two years as of 17 May 1998 were authorized a one-year opportunity (17 May 1998 through 16 May 1999) to disenroll.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058986C070421
a. correction of item 18b (Prior Active Service) on his DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 18 December 1981, which amended his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) originally dated 18 November 1975 to show the entry “06 02 00”; The Board considered the applicant’s contention that item 25a (Specialty Number and Title) on his DD Form 214 with an effective date of 18 March 1963 should be corrected to show MOS 121.63. The Board also considered the applicant’s...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058989C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. COUNSEL CONTENDS : That the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058990C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. A 1 June 2000 decision by the Board of Veterans’ Appeals awarded the applicant service connection for steatoheapatitis, a 20 percent disability rating for his left knee disability, and an effective date of 23 March 1993 for a grant of service connection for exercise-induced asthma. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058992C070421
The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 incorrectly shows he received disability severance pay in the amount of $11,577.60. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Army on 16 November 1998 for 3 years. In the processing of this case a staff member of the Board contacted the Defense Finance Accounting Service (DFAS) to verify the amount of severance pay that the applicant was paid upon his separation from the Army.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058993C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. APPLICANT REQUESTS: Award of the Combat Medical Badge (CMB) w/1 bronze star. There is no evidence in the available record nor is there any evidence in the information that the applicant provided to support his entitlement to the award of the CMB.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058994C070421
Section 14304, Title 10, United States Code (USC), states officer will be considered for promotion to the next higher grade by a promotion board far enough in advance to completing the MYSIG so that if the officer is recommended for promotion, the promotion may be effective on or before the date on which the officer completes the MYSIG. The board adjourned on 2 April 1999 and recommended the applicant for promotion to MAJ. On 14 January 2000, the Chief, Office of Promotions – Reserve...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058997C070421
Thomas E. O'Shaughnessy, Jr.Member The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by issuing to the individual concerned a DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214, changing her Reenlistment Code in Block 27...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058998C070421
On 8 March 1984, an informal PEB found the applicant to be unfit for duty due to anterolateral rotatory instability and medial instability of the right knee with pain and swelling on exertion, rated as moderate, under the VA Schedule of Rating Disabilities (VASRD) code 5257. Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation of physical fitness of soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059000C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Army Regulation 635-40 provides that a member who is charged with an offense for which he could be dismissed or given a punitive discharge may not be referred for, or continue, disability processing. DETERMINATION : The subject application was not submitted within the time required.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059002C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 29 March 1984 the appropriate authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed that he be discharged under other than honorable conditions. While the applicant may have been experiencing personal problems at the time, there is no indication in the available records and the applicant has provided no evidence to support his contention that he sought...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059005C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059007C070421
The applicant states, in effect, that his military records do not reflect that he was awarded the CIB and the BSM with “V” Device. The CIB and BSM with “V” Device are not recorded in the DA Form 20. The evidence of record shows that the applicant served as a light weapons infantryman (11B) in an infantry unit involved in combat operations while serving in Vietnam.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059011C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Item 27 (Decorations) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 does not show the PH as an authorized award. By regulation, in order to support awarding a PH it must be shown that a member was wounded in action, was treated for this wound by military medical personnel, and this treatment was made a matter of official record.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059012C070421
The applicant states that his correct date of birth is 1 November 1919 and not 1 November 1918, and that he was upgraded to Technical Sergeant prior to his separation. There are no available records nor did the applicant provide documentation to substantiate his claim that he was promoted to Technical Sergeant prior to his discharge. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059015C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his reentry eligibility (RE) code be changed from RE-3C to a more favorable RE code. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059016C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Her enlistment paperwork (specifically, her DD Form 1966/2, Record of Military Processing) shows that she graduated from Smyrna (Tennessee) High School in May 1999. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by issuing to the individual concerned a DD Form 215, Correction...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059023C070421
The evidence of record does not show that the applicant was wounded in action and he does not provide any evidence to show he was wounded. He was awarded the Army Commendation Medal but that award was not listed on his DD Form 214. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 15 April 1969 – 10 November 1970.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059026C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 6 November 1998, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059029C070421
On 10 May 1982, the applicant’s commander initiated separation action on the applicant under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-31, expeditious discharge. He had completed 2 years, 10 months, and 4 days of creditable active service and had no lost time. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059035C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected to show he changed his name.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059039C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059042C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: On 17 June 1982 the applicant was discharged from active duty under other than honorable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059047C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Army may rate only those conditions that preclude the individual from performing assigned duties. The VA rating does not establish physical unfitness, nor the degree thereof, for Department of the Army purposes.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059064C070421
Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on issues of propriety and/or equity: The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059102C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Public Law 92-425, the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP), enacted on 21 September 1972, provides that military members on active duty can elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to a surviving spouse and/or dependent children. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059104C070421
The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted in the Army of the United States on 19 March 1970 for a period of 2 years. AR 600-8-22 also provides that one overseas service bar is authorized for each period of 6 months active Federal service as a member of a U.S. Service in Vietnam from 1 July 1958 to 28 March 1973. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by issuing to the individual concerned a DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059110C070421
There is no indication in the available records to show that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations. It required retroactive application of revised policies, attitudes and changes in reviewing applications for upgrades of discharges based on personality disorders. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059112C070421
The Board considered the following evidence: APPLICANT STATES : That at the time of his discharge there was a question as to whether or not he would be given Chapter 18 discharge or a medical discharge, that the PA (Physician Assistant) had put him in for a medical discharge before he was put in the overweight program, and that he was injured at the time he was placed in the program and because of this injury there was nothing he could do to lose weight. The examining physician found him...