Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058935C070421
Original file (2001058935C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 26 July 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001058935

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. Chairperson
Mr. Hubert O. Fry Member
Mr. Eric N. Anderson Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge be upgraded.

APPLICANT STATES: That in all fairness he should have received a medical discharge instead of an other than honorable discharge. He had a nervous breakdown when he was 18 years old. He never lied about the pains in his stomach or his heart. His medical records showed that he was diagnosed with a constitutional psychopathic state, emotional instability; constitutional psychopathic state, inadequate personality, emotional instability; anxiety state; or severe nervous gastric disorder. He was absent without leave (AWOL) for 2 months and served 4 months and 5 days in confinement but his records show that he had a problem in the beginning. He provides extracts of portions of his service medical records and ten character witness letters as supporting evidence.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records were lost or destroyed in the National Personnel Records Center fire in 1973. The information contained herein was obtained from alternate sources.

The applicant entered active service on 26 September 1942.

The provided extracts of his service medical records show that the applicant was diagnosed with a constitutional psychopathc state and emotional instability on 9 October 1944 and with a constitutional psychopathic state, an inadequate personality, and emotional instability on 5 April 1945. Also on 5 April 1945, he was treated for gastric nervousness, severe psychoneurosis.

The applicant was discharged on 26 June 1945 with an other than honorable discharge. The authority for his discharge is unknown.

On an unknown date but prior to 19 January 1960, the Army Discharge Review Board denied an application to change the character of the applicant’s discharge. That action is not available.

Prior to 1 October 1949, on which date the Career Compensation Act of 1949, Public Law 351, 81st Congress, became effective, there were no provisions of law whereby an enlisted person with less than 20 years service could be retired from the Army for physical disability. Under then existing law, compensation and pension for service connected disabilities were under the jurisdiction of the Veterans Administration.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement and, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time.

2. The applicant’s records are not available. However, the Board notes that at no time was he determined by competent medical personnel to be unable to distinguish right from wrong and to adhere to the right. The Board presumes that the type of discharge given was appropriate given his mental health and the seriousness of his misconduct. In addition, prior to 1 October 1949 a “medical” discharge did not exist for enlisted personnel with less than 20 years of service.

3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__rvo___ __hof___ __ena___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001058935
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20010726
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 110.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04101078C070208

    Original file (04101078C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 AUGUST 2004 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2004101078 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. On 17 March 1970 the applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008203

    Original file (20060008203.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Sworn statements from two Soldiers who served with the applicant both relate that after an engagement with German tanks, on or about 15 January 1945, they both noticed that the applicant complained about his ears ringing and that he was having problems with his hearing. In addition to the awards listed on the WD AGO Form 53-55, the applicant is also authorized the Army of Occupation Medal with "Germany" Clasp, the World War II Victory Medal, the Presidential Unit Citation, and to wear three...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09198-02

    Original file (09198-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You enlisted in the Navy on 28 June 1975. The report of an aptitude board, dated 28 July 1975, indicates that you had a history of emotional instability, and that you quit school at age 17 because you "got into trouble, had to join the Navy". The Board noted from records obtained from Departlxent of Veterans Affairs (VA) that you received psychiatric care for a period of six months at age 10.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010877

    Original file (20110010877.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 October 1960, his unit commander initiated separation action against the applicant for unfitness with the issuance of an undesirable discharge. Nevertheless, his service records contain a duly-constituted DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) that shows: * he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 with a separation program number of 28B (Unfitness – Frequent Incidents of a Discreditable Nature with Civil or Military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9507565C070209

    Original file (9507565C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show that he was discharged for medical reasons, and that his discharge date be changed. He recommended that the applicant be separated from the military service under Army Regulation 635-212. On 3 November 1967, the applicant’s commander submitted a request that the applicant be discharged from the service under Army Regulation 635-212, with a general discharge certificate.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00623

    Original file (PD2009-00623.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB determined the s/p ACL reconstruction left knee to be a unfitting condition, rated at 10%, and that bilateral knee pain was a related, but not separately unfitting (category II) condition, with application of the SECNAVINST 1850.4E and DoDI 1332.3. The Board noted that the painful limitation of ROM, noted on some exams, was sufficient for rating IAW §4.59 (painful motion). Other PEB Conditions .

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02728

    Original file (BC-2003-02728.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02728 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199707261A

    Original file (199707261A.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 20 January l999 DOCKET NUMBER: AC97-07261A AR1998013770 In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606716C070209

    Original file (9606716C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 March 1944 his commanding officer recommended that the former soldier be discharged. He stated that he always had an uncontrollable temper and if anyone said anything cross to him, he would strike him. It appears that the intent of Army Regulation 635-209 was to change the policy for separating soldiers with undesirable habits and traits of character, recognizing that these unsuitable habits included chronic alcoholism, and soldiers separated for unsuitability should receive a general...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059570C070421

    Original file (2001059570C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He further states that he was discharged for AWOL but not for drugs. 24 October 1942 - 3 November 1942 AWOL 11 days. LOD NO EPTI.” He was also issued a WDAGO Form 56 (Discharge from the Army of the United States (blue)), a “Blue” discharge, a copy of which is not now in his file.