Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058972C070421
Original file (2001058972C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 25 September 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001058972

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. W. E. Schnupp Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. John N. Slone Chairperson
Mr. Lester Echols Member
Mr. Ronald E. Blakely Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That he be awarded the Expert Rifleman’s Badge (review of his request indicates that what he is actually requesting award of the Expert Infantryman Badge (EIB)).

APPLICANT STATES: That while he doubts any of the testing information for the EIB during 1964 – 1965 is available, his recollection of the test is quite clear. He says that he was disqualified for and protested the test involving land mines. He contends that in addition to probing for land mines, the test required that the mine be disarmed. He protested to test personnel that this was incorrect procedure, that mines were only identified and marked not disarmed. He claims that although supported by the field manual regarding mine clearing and his commander, his protest would have contradicted all of the training and testing others had gone through so the testing would not change. When he continued to contest the procedure, it cost him the EIB. He says that while the testing records may not be available, based on his record it is likely that he was capable of passing the test. He believes that his service record of commendations and completion of leadership schools and his selection as Division Soldier of the Month and Soldier of the Year support his contention.

In support of his request, he submits 18 enclosures, enumerated on the addendum to his application, which include many commendatory letters and honors received during his career and an extract of Field Manual 7-8 regarding the breaching and clearing of obstacles.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in the Regular Army on 11 July 1962 for 3 years and received training as a light weapons infantryman. He completed basic airborne training and was assigned to the 101st Airborne Division. He was honorably separated to the US Army Reserve upon expiration of his term of service on 9 July 1965 in the grade of sergeant.

His awards include the Good Conduct Medal, the Parachute Badge, the Expert Badge with Rifle Bar and the Marksman Badge with Pistol Bar.

The applicant’s record contains numerous accolades and reference to his selection as 101st Airborne Division Soldier of the Month. There is no information regarding participation in EIB qualification testing.

Army Regulation 600-8-22, Military Awards, provides, in pertinent part, that to be eligible for the EIB, an enlisted person must have a primary military occupational specialty within CMF 11, must meet the prerequisites and must take the test with an infantry unit of at least battalion size.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The available records contain no evidence and the applicant has provided none to show that he participated in EIB testing.

2. Although the applicant amassed an excellent record during his active duty service, that record by itself is not sufficient to warrant award of the EIB. Neither does the issue as to whether he was right or wrong regarding the procedures for clearing land mines have any bearing on the Board’s determination. Either the record or the applicant must show that he completed EIB qualification testing. In the absence of such information, there are no grounds for the Board to award the EIB.

3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___jns___ __reb___ _le____ _ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001058972
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20010925
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065360C070421

    Original file (2001065360C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006164

    Original file (20140006164.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the Expert Infantryman Badge (EIB) and any additional commendations for his service in support of Operation Desert Shield/Storm. There are no orders in the applicant's service personnel records awarding him the EIB or any other commendations, awards, or decorations that are not listed on his DD Form 214. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states award of the EIB...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020156

    Original file (20120020156.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was awarded or authorized the following: * Purple Heart (PH) (2nd Award) * gold star on Parachute Wings for jumps under fire (properly known as the bronze service star to be worn on the Parachutist Badge to denote a combat parachute jump) * senior Parachute Wings (properly known as Senior Parachutist Badge) * Air Medal (AM) * Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008740

    Original file (20080008740.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show his service in the Dominican Republic in 1965 and his awards of the Expert Infantryman Badge (EIB), the Combat Infantryman Badge, and any other awards he is entitled to as a result of his service in the Dominican Republic. Additionally, the evidence of record shows that the applicant was entitled to award of the NDSM and it appears that he should have been awarded the GCMDL for the period of 20 June 1962 to 18 June...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03095512C070212

    Original file (03095512C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect award of the Purple Heart and Expert Infantryman Badge (EIB). While there are no orders in the applicant's available records awarding him the Purple Heart, the appropriate Secretary of the Army signed his award certificate, and the date of his combat wound is consistent with other information contained in his file. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003973

    Original file (20070003973.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military personnel records do not contain General Orders or other evidence that show he was awarded the ARCOM. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, for award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for qualifying service after 1 July 1958 in U.S. military operations, U.S. operations in direct support of the United Nations, and U.S. operations of assistance to friendly foreign nations. However, the critical document that would justify...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000276C070206

    Original file (20050000276C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the applicant's records that shows he was awarded the EIB. Evidence of records shows the applicant took the EIB test, but the EIB was not awarded because he did not meet the prerequisite and qualify as Expert with the M-16 rifle within one year prior to taking the EIB test. In addition, documentation provided by the applicant shows that he requested an exception to the policy regarding award of the EIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091562C070212

    Original file (2003091562C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. However, his record does show that he earned the PH, for being wounded in action while serving in the RVN and that he received the Parachutist Badge based on his completion of the Airborne Course. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal, for his qualifying period of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059318C070421

    Original file (2001059318C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show he earned the Combat Medical Badge (CMB) and all awards and decorations to which he is entitled. Although there is no evidence to show that the applicant served as a combat medical aidman with this unit and was personally present when the unit was under hostile fire and actively engaged in ground combat, the Board does find sufficient supporting evidence to show his last duty assignment was HHC, 2 nd...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001562C070205

    Original file (20060001562C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) be corrected: to show all awards, decorations and medals he is authorized; all service schools he completed; and that he was assigned to the 6th Ranger Company. The applicant provides: a. The applicant is entitled to award of the Ranger Tab based upon his Certificate of Training issued by the US Army Infantry School showing he successfully completed Ranger Training with the 6th...