| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. John N. Slone | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Richard T. Dunbar | Member | |
| Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected to show he changed his name. He states that he served as S___ P___ but legally changed his name to M___ S___ P___ in 1966.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He was inducted into the Army on 18 April 1946 under the name S___ P___. He served under that name and was separated on 16 May 1947 under the name S___ P___.
In March 1960, the applicant legally changed his name to M___ S___ H___. In September 1966, he legally changed it to M___ S___ P___.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records. The data and information contained in those records should actually reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created. In the absence of a showing of material error or injustice, this Board is reluctant to recommend that those records be changed.
2. The applicant appropriately served on and was released from active duty under the name he provided upon his entry onto active duty. He did not legally change his name until 1960 and 1966, years after his separation.
3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__jns___ __rtd___ __dph___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001059035 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20010828 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 100.01 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060912C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088264C070403
Counsel stated that evidence was presented at the applicant's administrative separation board by two psychiatrists, one of whom was of the opinion that the applicant had a Personality Disorder and one whom stated the applicant did not. It was this doctor's opinion that the applicant was not suffering from any mental disorder, most particularly a Personality Disorder. The Board also notes that the DSM-IV appears to support Major P___'s testimony that an Adjustment Disorder was consistent...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076354C070215
He could say the applicant performed his duties as they were required of him to do. Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation for physical fitness of soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. The evidence of record shows that competent military medical authorities diagnosed the applicant with a personality disorder.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011370
CPT R___ L. S___ informed him he was being investigated for failure to report and child neglect. l. The GOMOR was filed in the performance section of his AMHRR on 5 May 2010. m. The second OER while assigned to Company A, 715th Military Intelligence Battalion, covers the rating period 13 August 2009 through 18 June 2010. The evidence presented in this case supports removing all of the comments in the GOMOR which reprimanded the applicant, thereby making it necessary to remove the GOMOR in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060846C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That her Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, DD Form 214, be corrected to show her current sex and name. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058727C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant was inducted into the Army on 21 October 1942 and entered active service on 4 November 1942. The applicant’s records are not available.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040007494C070208
It was a grossly disproportionate adverse administrative action when compared to the minor, if not inconsequential, nature of the underlying alleged misconduct and constitutes an injustice for the following reasons: 1) The applicant realized no personal or pecuniary gain by printing the brochures; 2) The applicant was commended for the very same print product by the Deputy Commander and Commanding General of the SWCS: 3) There was no prejudice or adverse effect upon the unit's PSYOP leaflet...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061841C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | 20060000756
The applicant did not deny taking the civilians at the World Bank to the PX. He first told the IO he never bought anything for World Bank personnel. The World Bank Director said SFOR Soldiers have power over Bosnian women and that asking them out is sexual harassment.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002291
In the last item in Section IV of the DA Form 5893-R, a checkmark appears and indicates that the applicant was informed of requirements for placement on the TDRL, the maximum tenure on the TDRL, the requirements for periodic medical examination and PEB evaluation, the minimum rate of retired pay while on TDRL, that while on the TDRL no change would be made in the disability rating, and the criteria for retention on the TDRL. On 2 February 2002, the USAPDA published orders notifying the...