| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Ms. Celia L. Adolphi | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Curtis L. Greenway | Member | |
| Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. | Member |
2. The applicant requests reconsideration of his request to be awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in Vietnam on 5 April 1969.
3. The applicant states, in effect, that he was wounded in Vietnam on 5 April 1969; however he was never awarded the Purple Heart for his wounds. In support of his application, he submits copies of a Duty Officer’s Log (DA Form 1594) dated 5 April 1969.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted on 17 April 1968 and successfully completed his training as a field artillery rocket crewman. He was advanced to the pay grade of E-3 on 10 October 1968 and was subsequently transferred to Vietnam on 12 March 1969. He was assigned to B Battery, 2d Battalion, 13th Artillery.
5. He departed Vietnam on 11 March 1970 and was honorably released from active duty on 11 March 1970. He was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Army Commendation Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Good Conduct Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. His records contain no evidence that he was wounded in action.
6. The applicant previously applied to the Board for an award of the Purple Heart and the Board denied his request on 12 September 2000 because there was no evidence to show that he had in fact been wounded. The facts and circumstances of that case is outlined in the Board’s Memorandum of Consideration (AR2000040655).
7. The Duty Officer’s Log submitted by the applicant and obtained from the National Archives shows that at approximately 2400 hours on 5 April 1969, the applicant received a chest wound from an incoming round and was medically evacuated to the 12th Evacuation Hospital by helicopter. The duty officer indicated that it was believed that it was the result of friendly fire from a M79 round (40mm grenade.) A subsequent entry indicates that it was confirmed that the applicant was a non-battle casualty. Two subsequent entries indicate that it was reported as an enemy attack (60mm round) and that the applicant was reported as wounded in action (WIA).
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was a result of hostile action, that the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and that the medical treatment was made a matter of official record.
9. Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register-Vietnam Era) was published to assist commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict.
10. Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that Department of the Army General Order (DAGO) 42, published in 1972, authorized the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation (RVNGC w/Palm) for service in Vietnam during the period 21 February 1970 – 28 February 1971. It also authorized the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal – First Class Unit Citation (RVNCAHM-FC) for the period of 1 August 1967 to 15 March 1970 in DAGO 51 published in 1971.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. Although the DA Form 1594 submitted by the applicant has conflicting entries as to whether he was wounded by friendly or enemy fire, the last entry on that document indicates that he was reported as WIA. Accordingly, the Board is inclined to resolve any doubt in this matter in favor of the applicant.
2. Therefore, the Board finds that it would be in the interest of justice to award him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in Vietnam on 5 April 1969 while serving in the rank of private first class with B Battery, 2d Battalion, 13th Artillery.
3. The Board also determined that the applicant is entitled to awards of the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation, and the RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citation for his Vietnam service with A Battery, 2d Battalion, 13th Artillery, during the period of 12 March 1969 to 11 March 1970. Although these awards were authorized subsequent to the applicant’s separation from active duty, the Board concluded, in the interest of equity, that the applicant’s record should be corrected to include these awards at this time.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in Vietnam on 5 April 1969, the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation and the RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citation while serving as a PFC with A Battery, 2d Battalion, 13th Artillery.
BOARD VOTE:
__dh____ __clg ___ ___cla___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
____Celia L. Adolphi_____
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001058979 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2001/09/11 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT PLUS |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 61 | 107.0015/PH |
| 2. 140 | 107.0094/RVNGC |
| 3. 141 | 107.0095/RVNCAHM |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078526C070215
Although the evidence of record has failed to show that the applicant was wounded in action against the enemy and that the treatment of his wound was made a matter of record, the statement from the company commander at the time, as well as records from the National Archives to corroborate the attack, is sufficiently convincing enough to show that he was in fact wounded on 11 January 1969 and that the failure to record the treatment and award him the Purple Heart was the result of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074809C070403
However, his records do contain orders awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) on 13 June 1968, which was not recorded on his DD Form 214 at the time of his REFRAD. While the applicant’s records do not contain a copy of the orders awarding him the Purple Heart, his records clearly contain information showing that he was wounded in combat on 14 May 1967 and that he was treated by medical personnel at the time. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000683
The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect that the last four digits of his social security number (SSN) is 5456 and that he was awarded the Silver Star. The applicant states that the last four digits of his SSN on his DD Form 214 are incorrect and that his award of the Silver Star is not reflected on that form. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000402C070205
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 15 August 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060000402 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. John Heck | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073599C070403
He was initially assigned to the A Battery, 6 th Battalion, 29 th Artillery , 4 th Infantry Division as a cannoneer. Although the applicable regulation provides that the CIB is only awarded to personnel who possess an infantry military occupational specialty who are assigned to an infantry unit that engages in ground combat against an enemy; there were exceptions made through a published supplement which clearly indicates that radio operators who served as advisors in infantry or infantry...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058293C070421
The evidence of record fails to clearly show that the applicant was wounded/injured as a result of enemy action. Therefore, he is entitled to be awarded those medals and to have his records corrected accordingly. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000307C070205
John Heck | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant sustained shrapnel wounds in Vietnam and that he was treated by medical personnel at the time; however, it appears that an administrative oversight resulted in his not being awarded the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050015083C070206
Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 18 August 1969; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 17 August 1972. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091574C070212
The applicant states that he received three awards of the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in Vietnam; however, none of them are entered on his DD Form 214. Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the applicant’s unit was subsequently awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/Palm) Unit Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal – First Class (RVNCAHM-FC) Unit Citation, and the Valorous Unit Award (VUA)...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080348C070215
The Board finds that the evidence of record establishes that he was injured in combat in Vietnam on 4 September 1970 and that he is entitled to an award of the Purple Heart for that injury at this time. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 6 August 1969 through 5 August 1971. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.