| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. Luther L. Santiful | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Member | |
| Mr. John T. Meixell | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In his original application dated 5 March 2000, that his records be corrected to show he disenrolled from the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).
APPLICANT STATES: That he was not told that he could disenroll. He was told that once his wife reached age 62 she would get a pension every month. He did not receive any information on the disenrollment season. Since he can no longer work to get an extra income, he hardly has any money left to pay for food and medications.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant’s military records are not available. Information contained herein was obtained from alternate sources.
The applicant was born on 6 September 1933. His notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter) was received by him on 20 December 1976. He enrolled in the SBP in 1993 upon reaching age 60, apparently for spouse coverage.
When the applicant’s original application was received by the Board, his spouse’s concurrence was not provided. A blank concurrence statement was provided to him and her signature was requested. However, an incorrect statement (wherein the spouse concurred with the SBP election change to change the SBP election to former spouse coverage) had been provided. By the time the correct statement was provided to him, his spouse had left him and he was unable to contact her. Per coordination with the applicant, his original application was administratively closed and he was informed he could reapply once the appropriate documents could be provided. He was also informed that he should provide the Defense Finance and Accounting Service with a copy of his divorce decree as soon as he received it.
On 8 May 2001, the applicant and his spouse divorced (the divorce becoming final on 7 August 2001). There was no separate document that would effect a division of property between the applicant and his spouse. The applicant reapplied on 29 May 2001, providing the divorce decree as supporting evidence.
Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. Coverage and premiums are suspended when there is no eligible beneficiary.
Public Law 105-85, enacted 18 November 1997, established the option to terminate SBP participation. Retirees had a one-year period, beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which their retired pay started, to withdraw from the SBP. Members retired for more than two years as of 17 May 1998 were authorized a one-year opportunity (17 May 1998 through 16 May 1999) to disenroll. The spouse’s concurrence is required. No premiums will be refunded to those who opt to disenroll. This disenrollment period was publicized in the retiree bulletin “Army Echoes” and other military publications.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. There is no evidence of Government error in this case. The 1998 – 1999 opportunity to disenroll from the SBP was well publicized. There is no compelling equity interest on behalf of the applicant sufficient to support the relief requested. He received the benefit of the insurance provided by the SBP from 6 March 1993 until 7 August 2001, the date of his divorce. Had he died during that period, the SBP would have been paid to his beneficiary.
2. Regrettably, in the processing of his original application the applicant was provided a model spousal waiver in favor of a former spouse which his spouse signed and returned. The language of the waiver may have been interpreted by his spouse as a commitment to continue SBP coverage in her favor beyond the pending divorce. The applicant was unable to provide any other evidence to clarify the signed waiver so the spousal concurrence requirement has not been satisfied. His recent divorce has relieved him of the obligation to pay further premiums.
3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__lls___ __mhm___ __jtm___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001058984 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20010906 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 137.03 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013615
The applicant requests, in effect, to correct his records to show he did not elect to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP), and to refund all SBP payments made after 14 November 2011. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * DD Form 2656-2 (SBP Termination Request) showing his request to cancel SBP with the written concurrence of his former spouse * divorce decree showing the court reserves its jurisdiction to award spousal...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057250C070420
Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP for former military spouses for retiring members. Since the divorce decree stated that the FSM abandoned the applicant’s mother, the FSM presumably intended to provide spouse coverage for his new spouse rather than former spouse coverage for the applicant’s mother. His new spouse pre-deceased him and he presumably terminated his SBP coverage in March 1999 because of her death.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004691
The evidence of record shows the FSM elected SBP spouse coverage prior to his retirement, on 31 January 1993, with full base amount. The divorce decree indicates that the FSM agreed to execute the documents necessary to comply with the USFSPA as appropriate, in effect, to provide the SBP to his former spouse. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected: a. to show the FSM changed his SBP coverage from "spouse" to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020113
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), to show he changed his survivor benefit plan (SBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" (FS) within 1 year of their divorce and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. The applicant's applied to DFAS for an SBP annuity; however, on 22 February 2014, DFAS responded to her request denying an SBP annuity due to the FSM never making a valid request to change...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012836
In addition, he requests that his military records be corrected to show he elected RCSBP former spouse coverage. The applicant's military records show that he was honorably separated from the New Mexico ARNG on 31 January 2008 and he was transferred to the Retired Reserve. If he is requesting only that his RCSBP coverage be changed from insurable interest to former spouse, based on the evidence of record he has already been refunded the difference in premiums between insurable interest...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020841
The applicant states the following: * he was never informed he had to decline the SBP within 1 year of his divorce from his former spouse * he received no written communications from the military to keep him informed of these circumstances * the Tennessee Army National Guard requested that he complete a DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) in 2008 for inclusion in his application for retired pay * he completed the DD Form 2656 and declined SBP 3. On 18 October 1991, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019770
d. DFAS records show he had an eligible "spouse" beneficiary for the entire period he paid into the SBP; therefore, neither he nor his children are entitled to a refund of the SBP premiums. Spousal concurrence is needed only when a married person elects to provide an annuity for his spouse at less than the maximum level or to provide an annuity for a dependent child but not for his spouse. Records show that on 20 March 1978, although he had both a wife and dependent children, the applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022434
The applicant provided a Certificate of Death showing the FSM died on 20 December 2009 and was married to her at the time. A DFAS, Retired and Annuity Pay, letter dated 31 January 2013 addressed to the FSM's former spouse, stated that with regard to her recent correspondence to DFAS regarding the retired pay account of the FSM and SBP coverage, the following was provided: (1) Former spouse SBP coverage is not automatically granted based on being awarded in a divorce decree; a formal request...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001964
Nevertheless, when the applicant reached age 60 and applied for retired pay, he failed to make the election for former spouse SBP coverage as directed by the divorce decree. Therefore, in the interest of justice it would be appropriate to correct the records to show that the applicant elected SBP coverage for his former spouse and his current spouse concurred with the SBP election made by him. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020293
The applicant requests correction of his records to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from former spouse coverage to spouse coverage. g. DFAS made an error in accepting his election of former spouse coverage in 1999 and reinstatement of former spouse SBP benefits again in 2010. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the members agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at...