RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03162
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. Her duty title be changed from Social Worker to Family Advocacy
Element Chief, effective 23 June 1999.
2. Her records be corrected to reflect completion of Squadron Officer
School (SOS), effective 13 June 2001.
3. Her corrected record be considered for promotion to the grade of
major by the Calendar Year 2001A (P0401A) Central Major Selection Board.
_________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Her records were inaccurate at the time she was considered for promotion by
the P0401A board.
Her 23 June 1999 duty title entry was identified as being incorrect four
weeks prior to the P0401A board; however, because of problems with MILMOD,
the orderly room was unable to make the correction prior to the convening
of the board.
In support of her appeal, the applicant submits supportive statements from
her supervisor and commander; a statement from the test administrator; a
copy of her SURF dated 29 May 2001; a copy of her Officer Selection Brief
(OSB) dated 1 March 2002 with a copy of her Promotion Recommendation Form
for the P0401A board and a copy of her OSB dated 13 June 2001 with
attachments.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Information extracted from the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS)
indicates the applicant’s Total Active Federal Military Service as 4 March
1996. She is currently serving on active duty in the grade of captain,
with a date of rank of 6 January 1995 and an effective date of 4 March
1996. As of 29 April 2002, the MilPDS reflects her duty title during the
period 23 June 1999 through 17 April 2001 as Social Worker while assigned
to Whiteman AFB, MO.
The applicant’s Officer Selection Record (OSR) contains AF Forms 707B,
Officer Performance Reports (OPRs) beginning with the rating period 4 March
1996 and ending on 17 April 2001 with overall ratings of “Meets Standards.”
During these rating periods, the applicant received an AF Form 709,
Promotion Recommendation Form, for the P0401A Selection Board and received
an overall recommendation of “Promote.”
Additionally, the applicant’s OSB indicates she was awarded an Air Force
Commendation Medal for the period 25 March 1996 – 21 June 1999.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPPO recommends the application be denied. DPPPO states that
although the applicant’s Military Personnel Flight updated her duty title
to “family advocacy element chief” on 16 January 2002, DPPO could not
locate any documentation to substantiate the update. Therefore, the MPF
reverted her duty title back to “social worker” as reflected on her OPRs
closing 17 April 2000 and closing 17 April 2001. Furthermore, DPPPO states
that the applicant has only provided support from her rater on the OPR
closing 17 April 2001 and has not submitted letters of support from the
remainder of her rating chain for the OPR closing 17 April 2000.
DPPPO confirms that the applicant’s SOS test was scored on 13 June 2001 and
updated in the MilPDS on 2 July 2001. DPPPO states that the applicant
wrote a letter to the board explaining the date she would take her SOS
test; however did not inform the board of her course completion date.
DPPPO feels that the applicant did not show due diligence in ensuring her
SOS was in her OSB; therefore, granting SSB consideration is not warranted.
DPPPO states that on 24 January 2002, the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board
(ERAB) considered the applicant’s request to correct her duty title from
“social worker” to “family advocacy.” The ERAB denied her request because
it appeared no corrective action was taken before the results of the P0401A
board were released and the applicant was notified of her promotion
nonselection. DPPPO states the ERAB was unclear as to why she did not
request the duty title of “social worker” also be changed in the PRF.
The DPPPO evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 5 April 2002 for review and response within 30 days. However, as of
this date, no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice.
a. We have reviewed the available evidence pertaining to the
applicant’s assertions related to her duty title on the OSB for the CY
2001A selection, including statements from her commander and the rater of
her April 2001 OPR, and we are unpersuaded that SSB consideration based on
a change to her duty history is warranted. Her contentions in this regard
are duly noted; however, in our opinion, the Air Force office of primary
responsibility has adequately addressed these contentions and we are in
agreement with their recommendation. Accordingly, in the absence of the
required documentation showing an official change to her duty title as she
has alleged, SSB consideration based on this issue is not appropriate.
b. As to the applicant’s assertions that the absence of
information on her OSB indicating she had completed SOS caused her to be
the victim of a promotion injustice, we note that she wrote a letter to the
board president explaining the date she intended to take her SOS test but
did not inform the selection board that this was an accomplished fact.
Furthermore, there is no indication in the available record that the
applicant took expeditious action to notify responsible officials at the
Air University that she had completed SOS. In view of the above and the
dates the applicant completed SOS and the board convened and based on the
exigencies of administrative processing of such matters, the absence of
this information from her OSB was, in our opinion, neither erroneous nor
unjust.
c. Accordingly, in the absence of evidence which would lead us to
believe her record was so inaccurate and misleading that the duly
constituted board, charged with the discretionary authority to select
officers for promotion, was unable to make a reasonable judgment concerning
her promotability in relation to her peers, the applicant’s request is not
favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 15 May 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. David W. Mulgrew, Panel Chair
Mr. Mike Novel, Member
Mr. John E. B. Smith, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Oct 01 w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPO, dated 21 Mar 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 Apr 02.
DAVID W. MULGREW
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01731
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 03-01731 INDEX CODE: 111.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The referral Officer Performance Report (OPR) closing 27 March 2001, Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) P0401A and any associated memoranda regarding the referral period be removed from his records and his corrected record be...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01106
Included in support is a statement from the 19 Sep 98 OPR rater who recommended the applicant’s duty title be changed to “SQ Pilot Scheduler/C-130H Pilot.” Despite the applicant’s request, the senior rater did not support the changes to the PRF or SSB consideration, asserting that while he regretted the administrative errors, they were minor and did not change the information in Section IV or in the OPRs. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01266
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-01266 02-02454 INDEX CODE: 100.05, 131.01 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Duty Air Force Specialty Code (DAFSC) effective 20 June 1999 be changed from “16F4A” to “P16F4AW” on his officer selection brief (OSB); his duty title effective 1 April 1995 be changed...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02454
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-01266 02-02454 INDEX CODE: 100.05, 131.01 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Duty Air Force Specialty Code (DAFSC) effective 20 June 1999 be changed from “16F4A” to “P16F4AW” on his officer selection brief (OSB); his duty title effective 1 April 1995 be changed...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02043
The IG investigation reported that five reasons had been cited for her dismissal. AFPC/DPPPO complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel reviewed the Air Force evaluations and stated that the essence of the DPPPE advisory opinion is that since the Inspector General did not find the applicant’s complaint of reprisal to have been substantiated, her record...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01373
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01373 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His duty history on the Officer Selection Brief (OSB) and duty title on the Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) prepared for the Calendar Year 2001B (CY01B) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board (P0501B) be corrected, and his corrected record be...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01932
She be given SSB consideration by the CY04J Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board with inclusion of a letter she wrote to the original board; her Officer Selection Brief (OSB) be corrected to reflect her five-month deployment in 2003 to the CENTCOM AOR and removal of AF Form 77 closing 26 May 2000, from her Officer Selection Record (OSR) and the corresponding OPRs for the same rating period from all of the benchmark records for the purpose of SSB consideration. She wrote a letter to...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01568
Specifically, his flight commander, Col L___, put his former duty title (Clinical Social Worker) on his last OPR at Kessler, rather than the job title he held at the time (Chief, Alcohol Drug Abuse Prevention and Treatment Program), as reflected on his Air Force Commendation (AFCM). It is plain to see by his letter of inquiry to his former group commander, that he went out of his way to be professional, not to claim discrimination on the part of his flight commander so long after the fact. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00601
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00601 INDEX CODE: 131.00, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: It appears the applicant is requesting revised Promotion Recommendation Forms (PRFs) for the CY01A (P0401A) and CY02B (P0402B) Central Major Selection Boards. Her CY02B PRF was written by the same squadron commander who...
Based on the evidence provided DPPPO recommends denying the applicant's request to be reconsidered for promotion to colonel (Exhibit D). However, it appears that the organization from which she has received this current certification is not recognized by the Air Force as an accredited board or agency and her records should not reflect board certification. As a result, the selection board was apparently advised that she was not board certified; however, it cannot be determined...