RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03464
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He should be awarded the PH for wounds he received on 1 September 1970,
when he was injured when an aircraft exploded at Da Nang Air Field,
Republic of Vietnam (RVN).
The applicant states that as a result of his injuries, he was hospitalized
at Cam Rahn Bay and while there was awarded the PH.
In support of the appeal, the applicant submits extracts from his service
medical and personnel records.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 30 July 1969 for a
period of four years.
The applicant was assigned to the 366th Civil Engineering Squadron, Da Nang
Air Field, RVN, as a Fire Protection Specialist on 27 July 1970.
While responding to an aircraft crash on 1 September 1970, the applicant
was thrown from the back of a fire truck when a 150 pound bomb exploded.
He was diagnosed with a cracked vertebra at Da Nang RVN Hospital and was
diagnosed with whiplash at Cam Rahn Bay Hospital.
The applicant was placed in a patient status at Wright Patterson AFB, Ohio,
from 11 October to 4 December 1970. He was diagnosed with spondylolysis
(L5-S1), without spondylolisthesis, Existed Prior to Service (EPTS),
aggravated by injury with low back pain.
The applicant was honorably discharged on 29 July 1973. He completed four
years of active service.
The applicant’s claim for a service-connected disability was denied by the
Veterans Administration (VA) on 15 September 1975, on the basis that
spondylolysis is a constitutional or developmental abnormality and not a
disability under VA law.
The PH is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy action
(i.e., gunshot or shrapnel wounds, hand-to-hand combat wounds, forced
aircraft bail out injuries, etc.) that required or received treatment by
medical personnel.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that
there is no evidence to support that the applicant was injured as a direct
result of enemy action.
On 15 February 2002, AFPC/DPPPR notified the applicant of the criteria for
award of the PH, requested he provide additional information, and he did
not respond.
The AFPC/DPPPR evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 19
April 2002 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice to warrant awarding the Purple Heart (PH).
After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the
applicant’s contentions, we are not persuaded that he has been the victim
of an error or injustice. In this respect, we note that the PH is awarded
for wounds received as a direct result of enemy action that required or
received treatment by medical personnel. The personal sacrifice the
applicant endured for his country is noted and our decision should in no
way diminish the high regard we have for his service; however, insufficient
documentary evidence has been presented to demonstrate that the wounds he
received on 1 September 1970 were the direct result of enemy action.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 01-03464 in
Executive Session on 30 May 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
Mr. Frederick R. Beaman, III, Member
Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 23 Nov 01, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 4 Apr 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Apr 02.
RICHARD A. PETERSON
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02988
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02988 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 2 Apr 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) for an injury he received on a combat flight over Vietnam. He provided another copy of the letter to the Board dated 26 September 2006,...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02398
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 5 Oct 07 for review and response within 30 days. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03243
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR states the primary criteria for award of the PH is that the individual be injured or wounded as a direct result of enemy action and that the wound required or received medical treatment by medical personnel. Each request is considered on the policies and criteria in use at the time the veteran was injured, and the determination is dependent on the documentary evidence presented. His...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00999
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00999 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 5 OCT 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant’s military...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00749
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00749 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 SEPTEMBER 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Purple Heart (PH). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01330
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01330 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 01 NOVEMBER 2007 __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal and any other decorations for his service in Vietnam. He feels this was a result of enemy action, and that he was treated for the shrapnel...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | bc-2003-03616
Furthermore, his medical records indicate that he had an operation. Applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of the DFC and states, in part, that there is no evidence he was recommended for, or awarded the DFC. Should the applicant provide additional statements containing specific details regarding his...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03309
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 03309 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 1 MAY 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. To be awarded the PH a member must provide documentation to support his claim that the wound was a direct result of enemy action, and...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02254
_________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should have been awarded the PH since he was wounded in Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that they could not find any support for award of the PH. Should the applicant provide evidence that he was injured as a direct result of enemy action, the Board will...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01903
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that applicant’s injuries were not the direct result of enemy action. His injury was caused by the bomb exploding and was the direct result of enemy action. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and the documentation provided by applicant, we find insufficient evidence to substantiate the explosion was the direct result of...