In support of his request, applicant provided his MSM citation and special order GB-18. DPPPO states that although the period of award for the decoration was through 17 Jul 01, the orders for the decoration were not published until 9 Nov 01. Thus, it is our opinion that the MSM was not a matter of record at the time the selection board convened and accordingly, it was not required to be included in his selection record.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01955 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. That office indicates that the applicant did not submit any new evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge proceedings. After a...
Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 20 Sep 02.
The applicant was discharged with a general characterization of service on 5 May 72 in the grade of airman. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS provided their rationale for recommending denial. After a thorough review of the evidence of record, we are not persuaded that the applicant’s general discharge should be upgraded to honorable.
AFBCMR 02-01977 INDEX CODE: 112.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
EDWARD C. KOENIG III Panel Chair Attachment: Ltrs, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 15 Jul 02, w/atch AFBCMR 02-01986 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating...
INDEX CODE: 128.05 AFBCMR 02-01989 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
The applicant contends that the 1 Mar 01 closeout date was an administrative error and that the correct closeout date should have been 1 Apr 00. Had the medal been considered, he would have been selected for promotion. The applicant requested supplemental promotion consideration and his request was denied because resubmission of the AFCM was initiated after the date selections were made for the 01E6 cycle, 31 May 2001.
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE states the RE code 4H "Serving suspended punishment pursuant to Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)" the applicant received is correct (Exhibit D). However, at the time of separation he was serving a suspended punishment under the provisions of Article 15. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did...
Based on the audit, the applicant's R/R was changed from 2 October to 14 June. The applicant was notified on 17 April 1999 about the change in his R/R date and that his points were being realigned to coincide with the 14 June R/R date. DPP further states the applicant was notified of the change in his R/R year date in April 1999 and he received an AF Form 526 for RYE 13 June 1999, and furthermore, the applicant had adequate time to earn points for the RYE 13 June 2000.
Members of the Board Mr. Lawrence R. Leehy, Mr. Mike Novel, and Ms. Marilyn Thomas considered this application on 21 August 2002. LAWRENCE R. LEEHY Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPTR, dtd 30 Jul 02 AFBCMR 02-02017 INDEX CODE: 137.00 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction...
The letter further explained his record showed he had only completed 9 years, 9 months and 9 days of satisfactory service; therefore, he did not meet the requirements for Reserve retired pay at age 60 then or in the future, nor any benefits associated with retired pay. The applicant did not complete 30 years of satisfactory service as required by Title 10, U.S.C., Section 12731, therefore, he is not eligible for Reserve retired pay at age 60. ...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02019 INDEX CODE: 131.10 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be retroactively promoted to the grade of E-9. In November 1957, he was told, by word of mouth, that his base commander had received a message from personnel at Andersen AFB stating that he had been instructed not to hand-carry his...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant indicated that the first and only notification he received regarding adding UPT gate months was AFPC’s Jul 95 letter. As a result of the policy change, the applicant had his records adjusted and fell one month short of his third gate under the ACIA of 1974. Prior to the policy change, the applicant fell 11 months short of his third gate credit.
The letter recommending the accelerated promotion requested a DOR of 15 Sep 99. It is further recommended that he be considered for promotion by a Special Review Board (SRB) and that his record be evaluated in comparison with the records of officers who were and were not selected by the FY03 Line and Nonline Colonel Selection Board, which convened in October 2002; if he is recommended for promotion by a Special Review Board, the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records be advised...
INDEX CODE: 112.05, 112.03 AFBCMR 02-02028 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set...
INDEX CODE 135.02 AFBCMR 02-02033 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
INDEX CODE 110.01 AFBCMR 02-02035 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
DPFP states that when he enlisted NGR 39-9, Grade Determination for Prior Service Enlistees, was the applicable regulation. After reviewing the available evidence of record it appears that his grade and date of rank upon enlistment into the Air National Guard were properly determined. Accordingly, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-02045 INDEX CODE 110.02 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 reflect a narrative reason of “Completion of Required Active Service” rather than “Non-Selection, Permanent Promotion,” and award of the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM). The narrative reason for discharge was...
On or about 28 May 1986, you failed to properly maintain specialized team training records, as it was your duty to do so, as evidenced by a letter of reprimand dated 30 May 1986. The commander recommended that the applicant receive a general discharge and the file was adequate to support such a characterization. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A. He was asked to provide a copy of his TDY order, showing that he was deployed in direct support of Operation ALLIED FORCE, and a copy of his Travel Voucher to show that he was in the designated area for 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive days. The KCM is...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not...
INDEX CODE: 131.01 AFBCMR 02-02088 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for...
INDEX CODE: 131.09, 131.04, 131.05 AFBCMR 02-02088 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Special Review Board and adopt that recommendation as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
The member was a sergeant at that time. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that his late father should be promoted beyond the grade of technical sergeant. Exhibit B. Deceased Members's Limited Master Personnel Records.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02095 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. He was a model airman, never in trouble and it seemed that the Air Force didn’t take this into account. Based upon the documentation in his records,...
INDEX CODE: 135.02 AFBCMR 02-02106 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-02111 INDEX CODE 100.06 110.02 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation program designator (SPD) code of “JGA” (Entry level performance and conduct) and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge or entry level separation without...
The time he served in the Army Guard would give him the 30 years of service as of 12 July 2003. The applicant has completed 20 years and 19 days TAFMS and therefore must complete 9 years, 11 months and 11 days on the retired list before he can be advanced to the grade of technical sergeant. Therefore, they recommend denial of the application (Exhibit C).
INDEX CODE: 112.05, 112.03 AFBCMR 02-02122 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set...
The SRB review had not been announced as of the date the applicant reenlisted and therefore the MPF was not able to brief the applicant it had changed. However, we have been advised by the Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) that the applicant’s Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) was affected by the STOP LOSS program which was in effect at the time. Therefore, had he not reenlisted in December 2001, he would not have been allowed to separate on January 13, 2002; rather, an extension of his...
INDEX CODE: 128.05 AFBCMR 02-02125 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-02126 INDEX CODE 126.02 126.04 111.02 111.05 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Article 15 imposed on 11 May 00 be voided, his record be expunged, and leave be restored to his account. According to the personnel data system, his Enlisted Performance Reports (EPRs) from 1995 through 24 Oct...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. We also find insufficient evidence to warrant a recommendation that the discharge be upgraded on the basis...
AFBCMR 02-02138 Index Number: 128.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
AFBCMR 02-02139 INDEX NUMBER: 121.03 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXXXXXX, XXX-XX-XXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02141 INDEX CODE: 128.14 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be authorized Temporary Lodging Expense (TLE) for 5 days at $34.00 per day. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was...
The applicant submitted a request to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) to have his under honorable conditions (general) discharge upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states the LOCs and LORs on file were submitted by his supervisor (SSgt P.). Exhibit B.
INDEX CODE: 112.05, 112.03 AFBCMR 02-02157 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set...
The members of the Board, Messrs. Michael K. Gallogly, Billy C. Baxter, and James W. Russell III, considered this application on 6 August 2002. MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY Panel Chair Attachment: Ltrs, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 22 Jul 02, w/atch AFBCMR 02-02169 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for...
INDEX CODE 100.03 AFBCMR 02-02170 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
The members of the Board, Messrs. Michael K. Gallogly, Billy C. Baxter, and James W. Russell III, considered this application on 6 August 2002. MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY Panel Chair Attachment: Ltrs, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 22 Jul 02, w/atch AFBCMR 02-02172 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for...
__________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force found at Exhibit C. __________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLSA/JAJM recommends denial of the applicant’s request. The Article 15 specification alleged that on 14 Aug 93...
Members of the Board Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Mr. Billy Baxter and Mr. Philip Sheuerman considered this application on August 15, 2002. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd Jul 31, 2002, w/Atch AFBCMR 02-02174 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for...
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 26 Jul 02.
INDEX CODE 110.02 AFBCMR 02-02183 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
INDEX CODE: 112.05, 112.03 AFBCMR 02-02918 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set...
AFBCMR 02-02199 INDEX CODE: 137.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT, SSN Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02201 INDEX CODE 128.02 COUNSEL: No HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed for the cost of airline tickets self-procured outside the Traffic Management Office (TMO)/Contractor Travel Office (CTO) for a permanent change of station (PCS) from Dover AFB, DE to Mountain Home AFB, ID, in the amount of...