RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-02111
INDEX CODE 100.06 110.02
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His separation program designator (SPD) code of “JGA” (Entry level
performance and conduct) and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of
“2C” (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge or entry
level separation without characterization of service) be changed so he
can reenlist.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
At the time of the incident, he and the individual were in an argument
and both exchanged inappropriate words. This was an isolated incident
not an appropriate reason to discharge him. He was not given a
specific reason why he was being separated or why he was “unable to
adapt.” He now has the maturity and responsibility that is required to
succeed in the Air Force.
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 29 Jul 98. He was
counseled on 19 Oct 98 for failing his block test. On 29 Oct 98, he
was sent to correctional custody for missing physical conditioning
(PC) and being late for class several times. On 4 Nov 98 he again
failed to show up for PC and school. On 9 Nov 98, he missed PC for the
third time and received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR). On 11 Dec 98, he
received another LOR for threatening to throw an airman through a
window. The applicant was given an entry-level separation on 17 Dec 98
after 4 months and 19 days of active service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPRSP provided their rationale for recommending denial.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
HQ AFPC/DPPAE confirmed the accuracy of the RE code.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Complete copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant on 27 Sep 02 for review and comment within 30 days. As of
this date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. After a thorough review of the
evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded
that his SPD and RE codes should be changed. Applicant’s contentions
are duly noted; however, we do not find these uncorroborated
assertions, in and by themselves, sufficiently persuasive to override
the rationale provided by the Air Force. In this regard, he has not
demonstrated that his misconduct and separation in less than 180 days
of service warrant anything other than the SPD and RE codes he
received. We therefore agree with the recommendations of the Air Force
and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that
the applicant has failed to sustain his burden of having suffered
either an error or an injustice. In view of the above and absent
persuasive evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 10 December 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Olga M. Crerar, Panel Chair
Ms. Brenda L. Romine, Member
Mr. James W. Russell III, Member
The following documentary evidence relating to AFBCMR Docket Number 02-
02111 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 18 Jun 02.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRSP, dated 25 Jul 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dated 18 Sep 02.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Sep 02.
BRENDA L. ROMINE
Panel Chair
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02572 INDEX CODE: 100.03 HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X be changed so that he may reenlist. The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03177
An AF Form 1411 (Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve) indicates that on 17 Apr 03, the applicant extended his enlistment for eight months to qualify for a permanent change of station (PCS) assignment, changing his DOS to 21 Apr 05. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03603
On 2 Nov 95, the applicant was notified of his commander’s intent to recommend discharge for a pattern of misconduct. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00674
(b) On 10 August 1986, received a Letter of Counseling (LOC) for failure to call his duty section as directed. On 18 December 1987, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) approved applicant's request for upgrade of his discharge to honorable; however, his request for a change of RE code was denied. Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 May 03.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02924 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed so that he may reenlist in the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 9 January...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01231
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01231 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed. He recommended a general discharge. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states that they believe the discharge was...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03654
This information was on his Officer Performance Report (OPR) for the period ending 28 September 2000, which met the CY00A selection board. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPO states they reviewed the findings in the HQ AFPC/DPPPE advisory and have nothing further to add. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01122
On 22 October 2002, the applicant received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) for failure to report for mandatory weekend remedial training. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE indicated that the reenlistment code 2C, “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service” was properly accessed to the applicant’s record as he was discharged in accordance with Air Force...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02827 INDEX CODE 106.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general discharge be upgraded to honorable and her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “2B” (Involuntarily discharged with general or UOTHC characterization) be changed so she can join the Air National Guard. A copy of the complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02076
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02076 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. They indicated that per Air Force policy, senior airman and sergeants HYT is ten years total active services. Based on the documentation in applicant’s case file, the RE code given...