RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02175
INDEX NUMBER: 128.05
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None
XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be allowed to receive the Selective Reenlistment Bonus for the Air
Force Specialty Code (AFSC) that he has been approved for retraining
into vice his present AFSC.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust
and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the
applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by
the appropriate office of the Air Force found at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPAE reviewed this application and recommended denial. A
complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 26
Jul 02 for review and comment within 30 days. To date, a response has
not been received.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. While it is unfortunate that the
timing of events in the applicant’s career precludes his eligibility
for the SRB, we find no evidence of an error or injustice. While there
are times when an exception to policy may be warranted, we do not
believe this to be true in the applicant’s case. The Air Force must
establish and follow policy to carry out its mission. As such, the
policy as it applies in the applicant’s case would affect any other
individual in a similar situation the same. In the absence of evidence
that the policy was applied unfairly in this instance, we cannot
recommend granting the relief requested.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-02175 in
Executive Session on 13 September 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Panel Chair
Mr. John E.B. Smith, Member
Ms. Brenda L. Romine, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 Jul 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 22 Jul 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 26 Jul 02.
ROSCOE HINTON, JR.
Panel Chair
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the SRB review had not been announced as of the date...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02551
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the SRB review had not been announced as of the date...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00783
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00783 INDEX CODE: 102.05 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force be changed from four years to six years and he be given the pay grade of airman first class (E-3). ...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00680 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment date of 1 Jan 02 be changed to 2 Jan 02 in order to qualify for a higher Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) entitlement. The HQ AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02535
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02535 INDEX CODE: 112.10 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed from 2C (involuntary separation with honorable discharge) to enable him to enter the Air Force Reserve. On 27 June 1994, the Squadron Section Commander signed a...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02754
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02754 INDEX CODE: 112.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS: A constructive reenlistment to change his term of enlistment (TOE) from six to four years. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied. ...
He received an RE Code of 2C, which defined means "Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C, D and E. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFBCMR Medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01635
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted and entered active duty in the Regular Air Force on 7 May 03 in the grade of technical sergeant (TSgt) (E-6) with 14 years, 7 months, and 27 days of prior active duty. AFPC/DPPAE attaches a letter from the Chief, Enlisted Accessions, Air Force Recruiting Service, detailing the events surrounding the applicant’s enlistment and return to active duty. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE,...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the...
The SRB review had not been announced as of the date the applicant reenlisted and therefore the MPF was not able to brief the applicant it had changed. However, we have been advised by the Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) that the applicant’s Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) was affected by the STOP LOSS program which was in effect at the time. Therefore, had he not reenlisted in December 2001, he would not have been allowed to separate on January 13, 2002; rather, an extension of his...