AFBCMR 02-00641 INDEX CODE: 137.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: SSAN: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
AFBCMR 02-00643 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum...
Rather, the PRF is a reflection of the senior rater’s opinion of whether the applicant was ready at that time for promotion. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the advisory opinions and furnished a response which is attached at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. ...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00651 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. DPPRS stated that the applicant provided no facts warranting an upgrade of his discharge. Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 Mar 02, w/atch.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00658 INDEX NUMBER: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, dated 21 October 1973, be amended in Item 30, Remarks, to reflect Vietnam - Yes. ...
On 21 May 02, they informed the applicant that he had not provided the necessary details regarding his broken leg, no medical documentation of a broken leg or hospitalization could be found, and that he had not explained or provided any documents showing that he had been wounded or injured as a direct result of enemy action. They provided applicant a copy of the Purple Heart Criteria, and asked him to provide the necessary documents or withdraw his claim. A complete copy of the evaluation...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00665 INDEX CODE: 100.00, 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect the place of his foreign service and award of the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the...
At the very least the retiree should be given the opportunity to accept or decline further SBP enrollment when the new spouse is enrolled in DEERS. In support of his appeal, the applicant submitted a letter from his spouse, his retiree account statements (dated 11 and 24 January 2002), and a letter from DFAS. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR STAFF EVALUATION: Through his member of Congress, applicant provided a personal statement,...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPTR reviewed the application and states in reviewing the service member's records there is no evidence that he attempted to terminate the applicant's SBP following their divorce; nor is there any evidence to indicate that he requested cessation of costs when the law permitted SBP premiums to cease after a spouse beneficiary loses eligibility, therefore, they cannot speculate regarding...
AFBCMR 02-00669 INDEX NUMBER: 128.14 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
INDEX CODE: 128.14 AFBCMR 01-00680 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied the member's request to change her reason for discharge on 7 April 1997. A DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, has been completed to correct these errors, and is now filed in the member’s records. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00675 INDEX CODE 110.00 110.02 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded, his reason for separation be changed from “Misconduct – Drug Abuse” and his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed from 2B. The pertinent facts...
Unfortunately, the other unit within the state held a promotion board and used the allocation during the same time of his promotion board. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states that the control grade roster provided by DPFP is from April 2001 and does not reflect the information that it should. This would reflect an error on the part of the monthly control grade report.
At the time of his retirement, the applicant was the command chief master sergeant for the HQ 11th Wing (11WG) at Bolling AFB, DC. However, according to HQ AFPC/DPPPR (Exhibit C), the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC) disapproved both the original and reconsideration requests. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00680 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment date of 1 Jan 02 be changed to 2 Jan 02 in order to qualify for a higher Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) entitlement. The HQ AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit...
AFBCMR 02-00681 INDEX CODE: 112.07 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT, SSN Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
Members of the Board Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Mr. John B. Hennessey, and Mr. Michael Maglio considered this application on 5 June 2002. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Vice Chair Attachment: Ltr, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 17 Apr 02, with attachment AFBCMR 02-00682 INDEX CODE: 128.05 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the...
Members of the Board Mr. Albert F. Lowas, Jr., Mr. Laurence M. Groner, and Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, considered this application on 27 June 2002. ALBERT F. LOWAS, JR. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 31 May 02 AFBCMR 02-00683 INDEX CODE: 112.07 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force...
Members of the Board, Mr. Philip Sheuerman, Mr. Billy C. Baxter, and Mr. James W. Russell, III, considered this application on 29 May 2002. PHILIP SHEUERMAN Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 17 Apr 02, w/atchs AFBCMR 02-00684 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for...
After a thorough review of the evidence presented, it appears that the applicant did not receive adequate information by Military Personnel Flight (MPF) representatives regarding the ramifications to his future Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) entitlements imposed by a reenlistment. __________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show...
Members of the Board Mr. Roscoe Hinton Jr., Mr. Laurence M. Groner and Ms. Martha Maust considered this application on May 22, 2002. ROSCOE HINTON JR. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd April 17, 2002, w/Atch AFBCMR 02-00686 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction...
AFBCMR 02-00687 Index Number: 112.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum...
The applicant was discharged on 3 April 1957 with an UOTHC discharge. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 3 April 1957, he was discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions). Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 5 Apr 02.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00693 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be upgraded. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states that they believe the discharge was consistent with the procedural and...
She received a citation to accompany the award of the AFCM at an award ceremony the month before her discharge from active duty. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied. DPPPR states that without an order awarding the AFCM to the applicant, they cannot verify her eligibility for his decoration.
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
DPPPWB further states the Air Force, after 56 years and limited records, can not determine if the applicant should have received a promotion prior to his separation from the service. Therefore, based on the rationale provided they recommend denying the applicant’s request (Exhibit D). We believe it should be pointed out that the applicant may have been deserving of a promotion but in the absence of evidence to the contrary, the Board must assume the applicant was discharged in the...
The applicant filed an appeal with the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB) requesting the OPR be removed from his records because the OPR did not reflect an accurate assessment of his work performance. Based on the evidence provided, DPPPE recommends denying the applicant's request. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02- 00702 in Executive Session on July 2, 2002, under the provisions of AFI...
On 18 December 2001, the Assistant Staff Judge Advocate recommended that the applicant be separated from the service with an Entry Level Separation. Applicant was discharged on 9 January 2002, in the grade of airman basic with an Entry Level Performance and Conduct discharge, under the provisions of AFI 36-3208. The Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2C, “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service” is correct.
A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant concurs that, according to the current Air Force Instruction, his DOR was indeed computed correctly. An officer on EDP as a member of the Reserves for 2 years is promoted to first lieutenant. However, if that same officer is called to active duty at 1 year, 11 months and 31 days, he remains a second...
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPAO evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant indicated that he wanted to clarify that his request is to have his DIEMS changed to 26 Aug 80--the date he was eligible to enlist. The evidence of record reflects that the applicant enlisted as a Reserve of the Air Force on...
AFBCMR 02-00707 INDEX CODE: 112.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
INDEX CODE 112.07 AFBCMR 02-00708 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
INDEX CODE: 112.07 AFBCMR 02-00709 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AFBCMR 02-00711 INDEX CODE: 112.07 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT, SSN Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AFBCMR 02-00713 INDEX CODE: 128.05 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: SSAN: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 7 Jun 02 and again on 21 Jun 02 for review and comment within 30 days. We also accept their recommendation to change the applicant’s reenlistment date to 18 Jan 02. VAUGHN E. SCHLUNZ Panel Chair AFBCMR 02-00714 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and...
Members of the Board Mr. Roscoe Hinton Jr., Mr. Mike Novel, and Mr. Thomas J. Topolski Jr. considered this application on 19 June 2002. ROSCOE HINTON JR. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 31 May 02, with attachment AFBCMR 02-00715 INDEX CODE: 128.05 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the...
INDEX CODE: 112.00 AFBCMR 02-00716 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
Members of the Board, Mr. Roscoe Hinton Jr., Mr. Mike Novel, and Mr. Thomas J. Topolski, Jr., considered this application on 19 June 2002. ROSCOE HINTON JR. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 1 Jun 02, w/atchs AFBCMR 02-00718 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for...
AFBCMR 02-00726 INDEX NUMBER: 100.06 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXXXXXX, XXX-XX-XXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00727 INDEX CODE 137.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late husband's records be corrected so that she may be eligible for a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity. She feels she is entitled to any and all benefits regarding her spouse, as this is what he would have chosen had he not been...
They note that many trainees in the AFROTC program participate in training (in the applicant’s words, perform cadet duties) without being under contract pursuant to 10 USC 2104 or 2107. Therefore, this orientation period would not have entitled the applicant to Field Training pay in accordance with 37 USC 209 during that time. As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
He does not believe that the voiding and removal of the 1996 EPR can have any “positive effect.” The DMSM (1OLC) he received was the result of corrective action taken after the DTRA IG recommended he receive an appropriate end of tour award. First, he received the DMSM for his assignment ending in 1996 as corrective action in 1999. The applicant’s DMSM could not be considered by the 97E8 promotion board because it was not in his records.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00735 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS: Reinstatement of his Promotion Sequence Number (PSN) 11276.0 for Cycle 99E5 to staff sergeant (E-5), promotions effective Sep 99 - Aug 00. He had completed a total of 5 years and 11 months and was serving in the grade of E-4 at the time of...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00737 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). In response, he provided a letter that is appended at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00741 INDEX NUMBER: 128.10 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His indebtedness to the government in the amount of $1982.61 for multiple warehouse handling, drayage charges, and overweight shipment of household goods be remitted. We took notice of the applicant's complete...
It was later determined that JPPSO had actually recommended to the Board that it grant the applicant relief by reducing his debt to $199.92 (see Exhibit C). We recommend that the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below. ROSCOE HINTON, JR. Panel Chair AFBCMR 02-00741 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code...
Members of the Board Mr. Terry A. Yonkers, Ms. Barbara J. White- Olson, and Mr. James W. Russell III, considered this application on 27 Mar 02. TERRY A. YONKERS Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, USAF/DPRCC, dtd 6 Mar 02, w/Atch AFBCMR 02-00742 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for...