Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200705
Original file (0200705.doc) Auto-classification: Approved


                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:                            DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00705
                                             INDEX CODE 102.08
                                             COUNSEL: No

                                             HEARING DESIRED: No


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His date of rank (DOR) to second lieutenant be recalculated to provide
100% credit for the months he  spent  completing  his  degree  on  the
Educational Delay Program (EDP), giving him a DOR of 20 May 00  rather
than 2 Dec 00.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He completed his degree on the EDP early  and,  instead  of  receiving
100% credit for the 24 months toward time in grade (TIG), he is  being
penalized for his diligence and effort with a  50%  reduction  in  his
TIG. Therefore, he will be required to  wait  an  additional  year  to
receive the next higher rank. This is not an uncommon  injustice  done
to any EDP student who completes a graduate degree and comes on active
duty in less than  2  years.  The  injustice  occurs  in  a  student's
transition from being governed by Air Reserve Personnel Center  (ARPC)
regulations  to  Air  Force  Personnel  Center   (AFPC)   regulations.
Specifically, there is an inequity in how each  organization  computes
an individual's current grade DOR and  handles  promotions  for  those
individuals in the EDP.

His complete submission is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant was commissioned on 20 May 00 and entered active duty on
15 Jun 01 as a second lieutenant.  He received 6 months  and  13  days
total service credit for the period 20 May 00 to 14 Jun 01 and given a
DOR of 2 Dec 00.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPPAO reviewed the appeal and  provided  their  rationale  for
recommending denial.

A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant  concurs  that,  according  to  the  current  Air  Force
Instruction,  his  DOR  was  indeed  computed  correctly.  He  is  not
disputing that fact or pointing a finger of blame at  either  AFPC  or
ARPC. His goal rather is simply to bring to light an inequity  between
the AFPC and ARPC DOR/promotion guidelines that creates  an  injustice
for a select few officers. The justification for his submission is:  A
second lieutenant on active duty for 2  years  is  promoted  to  first
lieutenant.  An officer on EDP as a member of the Reserves for 2 years
is promoted to first lieutenant. However,  if  that  same  officer  is
called to active duty at 1 year, 11 months and 31 days, he  remains  a
second lieutenant and loses an entire year towards  the  promotion  to
first lieutenant. This may not be such a big issue for those  officers
who plan on getting out after their initial commitment is up. However,
for those planning on making a career in the Air Force, this injustice
reverberates through the  years  by  affecting  pay  by  thousands  of
dollars per promotion.

The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit E.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.

3.    Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the existence of probable error or  injustice  warranting  correction.
Notwithstanding the fact that the applicant’s  plight  was  caused  by
correct application of current  policy,  the  Board  agrees  with  the
applicant that he is being  penalized  for  completing  his  education
program earlier than 24 months. We find it  troubling  that,  had  the
applicant taken the full 24 months to complete his program,  he  would
have entered active duty as a second lieutenant with a DOR of  20  May
00, rather than 2 Dec 00, and been promoted to first lieutenant  at  a
much earlier date. In our opinion, requiring the applicant to wait the
additional time to be promoted to first lieutenant would constitute an
injustice.  Therefore, we recommend that the record  be  corrected  as
indicated below.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the  Department  of  the  Air  Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that his date of  rank  to
the Reserve grade of second lieutenant is 20 May 00, rather than 2 Dec
00.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the  Board  considered  this  application  in
Executive Session on 23 April 2002, under the provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

                  Mr. Terry A. Yonkers, Panel Chair
                  Mr. William H. Anderson, Member
                  Mr. Edward H. Parker, Member

All members  voted  to  correct  the  records,  as  recommended.   The
following documentary  evidence  pertaining  to  AFBCMR  02-00705  was
considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 25 Feb 02, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAO, dated 12 Mar 02, w/atch.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Mar 02.
   Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 17 Mar 02.




                                   TERRY A. YONKERS
                                   Panel Chair



AFBCMR 02-00705




MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to        , be corrected to show that his date of rank
to the Reserve grade of second lieutenant is 20 May 2000, rather than
2 December 2000.





JOE G. LINEBERGER

Director

Air Force Review Boards Agency

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2002-02438

    Original file (BC-2002-02438.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-02438 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His time spent completing his degree on the Educational Delay Program (EDP) be recalculated to provide 100% credit so that his date of rank (DOR) to second lieutenant would be 14 Dec 99, rather than 22 Sep 00. We find it troubling that, had the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02438

    Original file (BC-2002-02438.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-02438 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His time spent completing his degree on the Educational Delay Program (EDP) be recalculated to provide 100% credit so that his date of rank (DOR) to second lieutenant would be 14 Dec 99, rather than 22 Sep 00. We find it troubling that, had the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02496

    Original file (BC-2002-02496.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-02496 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His time spent completing his degree on the Educational Delay Program (EDP) be recalculated to provide 100% credit so that his date of rank (DOR) to second lieutenant (2LT) would be 1 July 2000, rather than 6 January 2001. We find it troubling that, had...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201257

    Original file (0201257.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-01257 INDEX CODE 131.05 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her time spent completing her degree on the Educational Delay Program (EDP) be recalculated to provide 100% credit so that her date of rank (DOR) to second lieutenant (2LT) would be 9 Jun 00, rather than 12 Feb 01. A complete copy of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0101074

    Original file (0101074.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-01074 INDEX CODE: 131.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of rank (DOR) to second lieutenant (2Lt) be recalculated to provide 100% credit for the months he spent completing his degree in the Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT) Educational Delay Program (EDP). However, he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0101074

    Original file (0101074.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-01074 INDEX CODE: 131.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of rank (DOR) to second lieutenant (2Lt) be recalculated to provide 100% credit for the months he spent completing his degree in the Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT) Educational Delay Program (EDP). However, he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03417

    Original file (BC-2002-03417.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant exposes what he feels is an apparent inconsistency between AFPC and ARPC guidelines that both deal with promotions and dates of rank of personnel participating in the Education Delay Program. The applicant argues that that same member who completes his education early and transfers to active...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03502

    Original file (BC-2002-03502.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Superintendent, Line Officer Procurement Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPAO, reviewed the appeal and provided his rationale for recommending denial. We find it troubling that, had the applicant taken the full 24 months to complete his program, he would have entered active duty as a second lieutenant with a DOR of 1 October 1998, rather than 3 February 1999, and been promoted to first lieutenant at a much earlier...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03416

    Original file (BC-2002-03416.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03416 INDEX CODE: 131.05 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of rank (DOR) to second lieutenant be recalculated to provide 100% credit for the months he spent completing his degree in the Educational Delay Program (EDP). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03157

    Original file (BC-2002-03157.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03157 INDEX CODE: APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of rank (DOR) be recalculated to provide one hundred (100) percent credit for the months spent completing his degree on the Educational Delay Program (EDP). A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachments,...