RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00737
INDEX CODE: 110.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His undesirable discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable
conditions).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
After he completed basic training he was assigned to radio and radar
school. He could not learn this trade and was reassigned to the Air Police
Squadron. He had no schooling or training in this field. He was court-
martialed, sentenced to confinement and released. Upon his release he was
reassigned to active duty. Later on his commander notified him he was
being processed for separation. He requested transfer to another
department, but his request was denied. This took place over 44 years ago.
In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement, a
letter from the National Personnel Records Center; a copy of his DD Form
293, Application for Review of Discharge of Dismissal from the Armed Forces
of the United States; and, his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United
States Report of Transfer or Discharge. His complete submission, with
attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 16 Mar 56. He was
progressively promoted to the grade of airman third class, having assumed
that grade effective and with a date of rank of 1 Sep 57. He was
discharged on 25 Jul 58 and provided an undesirable discharge. He served 2
years, 2 months, and 26 days on active duty.
In response to the Board's request the Federal Bureau of Investigations
(FBI) provided an investigative report pertaining to the applicant (see
Exhibit F).
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from
the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by
the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C.
Examiner's note: The applicant was provided a copy of the Clemency
Information Bulletin and asked to provide documentation pertaining to his
post-service activities. In response, he provided a letter that is
appended at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS reviewed applicant's request and recommends denial. DPPRS
states that he received Article 15 punishment in January 1957 for being
disorderly in quarters and for concealing his identity from the Charge of
Quarters; in February 1957 he received Article 15 punishment for being
disorderly in quarters, he was reduced to the grade of airman basic. On 7
May 58, he was tried by a summary court-martial for sleeping on post. He
was sentenced to 30 days confinement and fined $25. On 9 Jun 58, he was
found sleeping on post again and was tried by summary court-martial for
this offence. He was sentenced to 30 days confinement and fined $70.
During this period of service he was counseled numerous times and assigned
to various sections, but he continued to be a marginal producer with a
negative attitude, unacceptable performance, and unacceptable appearance.
He did not provide any new evidence of identify and errors in his discharge
processing. Additionally, he provided no facts warranting an upgrade of
his discharge.
The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant states that he is not denying the events that occurred over 40
years ago, he is simply asking if his discharge can be upgraded. His
complete submission is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of injustice. Even though the applicant has provided no evidence
to show that his discharge was improper or not in compliance with
appropriate directives, it is our opinion that relief is warranted in this
case. Since it has been over 44 years since his discharge and over 25
years since the last entry on his FBI record, it appears likely that he has
since led a stable and productive life and we believe it would be an
injustice for him to continue to suffer the adverse effects of an
undesirable discharge. Therefore on the basis of clemency, we believe an
upgrade of his discharge to general (under honorable conditions) is
warranted. Accordingly, we recommend his records be corrected as indicated
below
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 25 July 1958 he was discharged
with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions).
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-00737 in
Executive Session on 7 Aug 02, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Vaughn E. Schlunz, Panel Chair
Mr. E. David Hoard, Member
Mr. Clarence D. Long III, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 29 Mar 02, w/atchs .
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 18 Apr 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 May 02.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, not dated.
Exhibit F. FBI Investigative Report
VAUGHN E. SCHLUNZ
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 02-00737
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 25 July 1958 he was
discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable
conditions).
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00289
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00289 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 JULY 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). DPPRS states that based upon the documentation in the file, the discharge was...
A complete copy of the Air Staff evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states the incident on the FBI report is correct, but he has since that time earned his Master's and Journeyman's license in plumbing. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03544 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to an under honorable (general) conditions discharge. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, the Board majority is not persuaded to recommend upgrading the discharge. In...
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 26 Jan 89. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states the applicant has not submitted any evidence nor identified any errors or injustices that occurred in the processing of his discharge. A complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02694
He had served 1 year, 2 months and 6 days on active service with 8 days of lost time due to AWOL. On 17 March 1959, the applicant submitted an application to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFRDB) requesting his discharge be upgraded so that he may enter active duty service. ________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: A majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommends the application be denied.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02318
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02318 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge, or in the alternative, a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02418
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 0202418 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded so he can be buried in a national cemetery. AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant's sister...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00723
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00723 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 SEP 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. They found the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00652
He received two Airman Performance Reports (APRs) closing 16 October 1956 and 10 December 1956, in which the overall evaluations were “excellent.” The applicant’s discharge case file has been lost or destroyed. The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant’s request for an upgrade of discharge on 18 June 1958. On 22 April 2004, the Board staff requested the applicant provide post- service documentation within 30 days (Exhibit E).
Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Directorate of Personnel Program Management, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, reviewed this application and states that on 10 February 1956, applicant’s commander requested that he be involuntarily discharge for civil conviction. The Air Force in their advisory of 30...