RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00242 INDEX NUMBER: 110.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code and his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code 2C be changed to an eligible code so that he can reenlist and continue in the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AFBCMR 01-00245 INDEX NUMBER: 137.04 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AFBCMR 01-00246 INDEX NUMBER: 100.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AFBCMR 01-00248 INDEX CODE: 112.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00252 INDEX NUMBER: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His three-year Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) incurred as a result of his completion of T-37 Pilot Instructor Training be reduced by 16 months. Even if the applicant’s request to reduce his PIT ADSC by 16 months is approved his...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00254 INDEX CODE: 107.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH), Air Force Overseas Ribbon, Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), and Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA). DPPPR recommends denying applicant's request for award of the PH, Air Force...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00257 COUNSEL: GARY N. MYERS HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered for the period 23 March 1999 to 25 April 2000 be expunged from his records. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Chief, Inquiries/AFBCMR Section, AFMPC/DPPPWB, also...
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a letter from the CAOC7 Deputy Commander requesting restoration of the applicant’s lost leave (Exhibit A). Accordingly, the Board majority believes that his records should be corrected as indicated below. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that 5.5 days of annual leave were...
In support of the appeal, applicant submits his Article 15 submissions including numerous character references, and performance reports. On 13 December 2000, the applicant’s commander reissued the Article 15 for failure to report to work on 18 September 2000 (after his PTDY); failure to refrain from administering a vaccine to members of a particular squadron; and making a statement, with intent to deceive, concerning the fact that he (the applicant) was authorized to administer the above...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided an expanded statement, copies of his retirement orders and revoked orders, and other documents associated to the matter under review. The evidence of record indicates that, contrary to his own assertion, the applicant voluntarily resigned his ART position, which rendered him ineligible for RSSP under RTAP. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
DAVID C. VAN GASBECK Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 13 Mar 01, with attachment AFBCMR 01-00265 INDEX CODE: 128.05 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department...
The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response, within 30 days (Exhibit D). The counsel’s response to the advisory opinions is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. TEDDY L. HOUSTON Panel Chair Exhibits: A.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 01-00271 INDEX CODE 111.02 131.09 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) closing 6 Dec 99 be upgraded from an overall rating of “4” to “5.” _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His rater mistakenly compared his...
Current Air Force promotion policy dictates that before a decoration is credited for a specific promotion cycle, the closeout date must be on or before the Promotion Eligibility Cutoff Date (PECD), and the date of the DÉCOR-6, Recommendation for Decoration Printout (RDP) must be before the date of selections for the cycle in question. He had not provided any documentation showing that he had worked his request through administrative channels and failed to provide additional documentation as...
In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a personal statement; HQ AFRES/DP letter regarding Selective Reserve Transition Program; assignment orders associated with his administrative reaffiliation; a completion certificate of Air War College Associate Program; officer performance reports closing 4 June 88 and 3 Jul 89; and an AF Form 777 (Air Force Reserve Promotion Recommendation), dtd 31 July 1989. Applicant complete submission is at Exhibit A. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFRC/DPM, dated...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00280 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Item 17, (Member Was Provided Complete Dental Examination and All Appropriate Dental Services and Treatment Within 90 Days Prior to Separation) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty, be corrected to...
AFBCMR 01-00282 INDEX NUMBER: 128.01 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
The applicant enlisted in the Air Force Reserve on 29 September 1986. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 30 March 2001 for review and response within 30 days. As a member of the Air Force Reserve since 1986 who received Point Credit Summaries following his successful completion of every R/R year, we believe he should have been familiar with the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00287 INDEX CODE: 112.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her 10 December 1998 10-month extension to her enlistment be cancelled and, she receive a Zone A Multiple 3.5, Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) payment for five years and three months as stated on her AF Form 901, Reenlistment...
On 23 Sep 99, the applicant was separated from the Air Force under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Entry Level Performance and Conduct) in the grade of airman with an uncharacterized character of service, a separation code of JGA (Entry Level), and an RE code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service). However, the reason for separation and RE code are correct based on the facts that existed at the time of...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied with regard to the Bronze Star (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of this request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant further corrective action.
___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Knowing that he had a six-year ADSC, he took TA to run concurrently with his Air Force Academy commitment; that unknown to him, the applicable Air Force Instruction (AFI 36-2107) was re-written in June of 2000 stating that the ADSC for service academy graduates is five years; that sometime during his tour at Elmendorf, his ADSC changed from six years to five years, but he was never informed by his...
The applicant provided a 9 Oct 45 War Department document indicating that he was awarded the PH for wounds received in action on 13 Jun 43 in the European Theater. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. The Chief, Inquiries/AFBCMR Section, HQ AFPC/DPPPWB, advised that, since the applicant was a POW for approximately 23 months, he meets the prerequisites for a POW promotion and recommends he be promoted to MSgt effective 24 Sep 45, one day prior to his discharge...
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Members of the Board Mr. Henry Romo, Jr., Mr. William H. Anderson, and Mr. John E. B. Smith considered this application on 3 May 2001. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPTR, dtd 11 Apr 01 AFBCMR 01-00306 INDEX CODE: 137.00 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the counsel for review and response (Exhibit D). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00312 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) for the period 15 March 1968 through 2 September 1968. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Recognition Programs Branch, HQ...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00318 INDEX NUMBER: 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The close-out date of his 30 Jul 99 Officer Performance Report (OPR) be changed to 13 Jul 99; and that Sections VI (Rater Overall Assessment), line 9, and VII (Additional Rater Overall Assessment), line 5, on the OPR closing 6 March...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
This conviction resulted in the applicant being ineligible for promotion for a period of 5 years. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 9 Mar 01.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachment, is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states that a servicing MPF fails to respond to an official AFPC request for required documents on eligible members should not negatively impact any member’s full promotion consideration. The Air Force states that the citation for the Air Force...
INDEX CODE: 131.04 AFBCMR 01-00332 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
Members of the Board Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Mr. Timothy Beyland, and Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., considered this application on 3 Apr 01. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd Mar 19, 01 AFBCMR 01-00335 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Due to the delay in receiving her In-place Base of Preference (IPBOP) assignment approval notification, she began her second extension of her current enlistment contract. We also believe that the MPF had ample time from the date of the assignment approval to provide the applicant the assignment notification and the applicant would have reenlisted on her previously established date of separation...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's requests and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the request for the PH (1OLC) and the PUC be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not available at the time the application was filed.
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Inquiries/AFBCMR Section, Enlisted Promotions & Military Testing Branch, AFPC/DPPPWB, reviewed this application and stated the first time the contested report was considered in the promotion process was cycle 99E6 to Technical Sergeant. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Chief, Performance Evaluation Section, Directorate of Personnel Program Management,...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00356 INDEX NUMBER: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests that his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code 2X and his separation code “KBK” be changed in order for him to reenlist in the Air Force Reserve. The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). ...
Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd Apr 10, 01 AFBCMR 01-00357 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , be corrected to show...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00358 INDEX NUMBER: 100.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES Applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report or Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show that he flew two refueling missions from Ramey AFB Puerto Rico to South East Asia (Vietnam) between 1968 and 1970. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an...
In support of his application, the applicant provided copies of an application to the Air Force Discharge Review Board and his separation documents (Exhibit A). Based on the limited evidence available for the Board’s review, we are not persuaded that further relief in the form of an upgrade of his discharge to honorable is warranted. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 13 April 2001.
Had the decoration been properly processed after submission, he would have received the decoration before the PECD date and would have been selected for promotion. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Inquires/AFBCMR Section, AFPC/DPPPWB, indicates that current Air Force promotion policy dictates that before a decoration is credited for a specific promotion cycle, the close-out date of the decoration must be on or before the promotion...
Although the Article 15 was finalized after the closeout date of the EPR, the fact remains he received the Article 15 and signed for it before the report closed out. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force Evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and response. CHARLENE M. BRADLEY AFBCMR 01-00364 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of...
Additionally, the applicant has failed to submit any new evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred during the discharge process nor has he provided any facts warranting an upgrade of the discharge he received. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force Evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response. Having found no error or injustice with regard to the actions...