RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00337
INDEX CODE: 112.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The seven-month extension on her current enlistment be canceled.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Due to the delay in receiving her In-place Base of Preference (IPBOP)
assignment approval notification, she began her second extension of her
current enlistment contract. Had she received her IPBOP in a timely manner
her extension would not of taken effect and thus she would not be held
responsible for a 7-month SRB deduction.
In support of her application, she provides documents associated with her
enlistment extensions and her reenlistment request. Her complete
submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Information extracted from the Personnel Data System indicates the
applicant’s Total Active Federal Military Service Date as 24 April 1996.
She is currently serving on active duty in the grade of senior airman with
an effective date of rank of 24 April 1999.
On 12 December 2000, the applicant requested that her enlistment of 24
April 1996 for a period of 4 years be extended for a second time for a
period of 7 months to qualify for an overseas temporary duty. Her request
was approved on 19 December 2000 and her date of separation was extended
from 23 December 2000 to 23 July 2001.
On 1 December 2000, the applicant’s IPBOP assignment approval was prepared.
On 28 December 2000, the applicant signed this notification acknowledging
its receipt. On 9 January 2001, the applicant requested and was approved
for reenlistment for the IPBOP assignment. On 17 January 2001, she
reenlisted for a period of 4 years.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Chief, Skills Management Branch, AFPC/DPPAE, reviewed this application and
recommends denial. DPPAE states that at the time the applicant reenlisted,
she received an SRB (Zone A, Multiple 2) bonus. DPPAE indicates that her
reenlistment for 4 years did not cancel or invalidate her prior service
obligation. Therefore, she is not entitled to an SRB payment for the 7-
month extension period. The delay in the assignment notification does not
justify additional entitlements beyond those authorized by DoD policy. SRB
pay and entitlements are outlined in DoD 7000.14-R, Financial Management
Regulation which states “Additional obligated service is defined as any
active service commitment beyond an existing contractual service
agreement.” (See Exhibit C).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and reasserted her original
contentions. She indicates that due to the untimely receipt of her IPBOP
assignment approval, she was placed in a predicament to incur a seven-month
extension in addition to reenlisting for a period of 4 years. Applicant
believes she should not be penalized for the delay of the system.
Applicant’s submission is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice. After a thorough review of the
evidence presented, we are persuaded that corrective action is warranted.
We note that the office of primary responsibility (OPR) indicates that the
Military Personnel Flight (MPF) delay in notifying the applicant of her
assignment approval alone does not justify the applicant’s entitlement to
an SRB payment for the 7-month period extension. We do not agree. In our
view, it is reasonable to assume that the applicant entered her 7-month
extension because she did not receive her assignment notification in a
timely manner. We also believe that the MPF had ample time from the date
of the assignment approval to provide the applicant the assignment
notification and the applicant would have reenlisted on her previously
established date of separation instead of executing the 7-month extension.
In view of the above, and to remove the possibility of an injustice, we
believe the applicant should be afforded relief. Therefore, we recommend
that the applicant’s record be corrected to the extent indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that:
a. The seven-month extension of her 24 April 1994 enlistment for a
period of 4 years, approved on 19 December 2000, be declared void.
b. She was honorably discharged on 23 December 2000; rather than 16
January 2001 and she reenlisted in the Regular Air Force on 24 December
2000; rather than 17 January 2001 for a period of four (4) years, and on 24
December 2000, she was entitled to a Zone A, Multiple 2, Selective
Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 7 June 2001, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Thomas S. Markiewicz, Vice Chair
Ms. Diane Arnold, Member
Mr. Lawrence R. Leehy, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149 w/atchs, dated 30 January 2001.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 23 March 2001.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 20 April 2001.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Vice Chair
AFBCMR 01-00337
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to, be corrected to show that:
a. The seven-month extension of her 24 April 1994 enlistment for
a period of four (4) years, approved on 19 December 2000, be, and hereby
is, declared void.
b. She was honorably discharged on 23 December 2000; rather than
16 January 2001 and she reenlisted in the Regular Air Force on 24 December
2000; rather than 17 January 2001 for a period of four (4) years, and on 24
December 2000, she was entitled to a Zone A, Multiple 2, Selective
Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00288
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She received an assignment notification to Incirlik ABS, Turkey, and was advised that she would have to extend for 14 months to obtain retainability for this assignment. On 15 August 2003 the applicant reenlisted in the United States Air Force for a period of 4 years and 18 months. DPPAE’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-02427 INDEX CODE 128.05 112.07 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her nine-month extension executed on 11 Jan 02 be voided (per Exhibit E) and she be allowed to reenlist for six years so she may qualify for a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). HQ AFPC/DPPAER informally advised the AFBCMR Staff...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01813
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01813 INDEX CODE: 128.05, 112.05 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 Dec 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be paid based on the full four years she reenlisted for on 23 Dec 04 and not be reduced by the time remaining on the 23-month extension she was...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02558
We note that, at the time the Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) was announced for the applicant’s career field, she had planned to extend her enlistment rather than reenlist. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that she was honorably discharged on 2 July 2003 rather than 31 July 2003 and reenlisted in the Regular Air Force on...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2005-00311
DPPAE recommends a constructive reenlistment be authorized on the applicant effective 1 October 2003, for 4 years and 7 months, as he should have reenlisted upon approval of the retraining. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was honorably discharged on 30 September 2003, rather than 22 March 2005, and reenlisted in...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1999-00020
Effective 18 December 1998, 48 hours after she had reenlisted, paralegals in Zone A and B (2 to 6 years and 6 years to 10 years) were eligible for a reenlistment bonus. She was further informed that while the Reenlistment Section cannot know what will be on the SRB lists, it is and should be their responsibility to explain the SRB facts to all personnel reenlisting. Had the applicant been counseled concerning the release of a new Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) listing in December and...
Effective 18 December 1998, 48 hours after she had reenlisted, paralegals in Zone A and B (2 to 6 years and 6 years to 10 years) were eligible for a reenlistment bonus. She was further informed that while the Reenlistment Section cannot know what will be on the SRB lists, it is and should be their responsibility to explain the SRB facts to all personnel reenlisting. Had the applicant been counseled concerning the release of a new Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) listing in December and...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01733
Applicant provided an additional statement, dated 2 May 05, for the Board’s consideration, which is attached at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that she was honorably discharged on 28 April 2004, rather than 9 May 2005, and reenlisted in the Regular Air Force on 29 April 2004, rather than 10 May 05, for a period...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00287 INDEX CODE: 112.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her 10 December 1998 10-month extension to her enlistment be cancelled and, she receive a Zone A Multiple 3.5, Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) payment for five years and three months as stated on her AF Form 901, Reenlistment...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02408
To accept the assignment, she extended her enlistment by 17 months. After notification, she had to reenlist for four years in order to accept the assignment. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.