Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05021-08
Original file (05021-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

MEH
Docket No.

18 Sep 08

5021-08

 

 

Dear:

This is in reference to your ap
pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

record

A three-membb

sitting in
September 2

in accordante with administrative regula

applicable
considered

Cy the Board consisted of your application,

 

plication for correction of your naval

er panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
xecutive session, considered your application on 18

08. Your allegations of error and injustice were revie
tions and procedures
Documentary material
together with

wed

o the proceedings of this Board.

all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and

applicable
considered
of 8 Aug 08

After caref
the Board f
establish t

this connect
n the advisory opinion.

contained i

been denied.

ktatutes, regulations and policies.
khe advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo

lul and conscientious consideration of the en
ound that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
Ihe existence of probable material error or injustice.

In addition, the Board
1430 Ser 811/581

a copy of which is attached.

'

tire record,

In
the Board substantially concurred with the comments
Accordingly, your application has
f the members of the panel will be

ion,

The names and votes o

furnished upon request.

It is regre¢

favorable dc

reconsider
or other ma
regard, it
regularity
applying f
on the S opt
error or in

Enclosure

tted that the circumstances of your case are such that
tion cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
tter not previously considered by the Board. In this

is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when

yr a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
icant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
justice.

\ So
W. DEAN PF

Executive Dir Oo

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05032-08

    Original file (05032-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    reference to your application for correction of your naval lant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552. ber panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, executive session, considered your application on 18 008. ul and conscientious consideration of the entire record, ound that the evidence submitted was insufficient to he existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when ra correction of an official naval record, the burden is icant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06477-08

    Original file (06477-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    6477-08 15 September 2008 eference to your application for correction of your naval ant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552. er panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, xecutive session, considered your application on 2008. 1 and conscientious consideration of the entire record, und that the evidence submitted was insufficient to e existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when a correction of an official naval record, the burden is ant to demonstrate the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05607-08

    Original file (05607-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT BOARD FOR CORRECTION 2 NAVY A WASHINGTON DC This is in reference the applicati mMaval record pursuant to the provi | | IA three-member panel of the Board Records, sitting in executive/ sess application on 24 November 2008. injustice were reviewed in ac¢orda regulations and procedures applica Board. Documentary material ¢onsi regulations and policies. your ¥ 1 t After careful and conscientious c record, the Board found that the insufficient to establish the exi error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05682-06

    Original file (05682-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support there f, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion(furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluations Review Branch, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02085-08

    Original file (02085-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Boar of your application, support thereof, your naval record and applicable s regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of th record, the Board found that the evidence submitted insufficient to establish the existence of probable error or injustice. On 26 January 1991, the Department of Affairs denied your request for service connection of an alleged mortar wound of the right leg/foot be together with all material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7437 13

    Original file (NR7437 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This is in reference to your appli record pursuant to the provisions f the Board for Correction of Naval Fecords, gitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 March 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correc 1 record, the burden is on the applicant to demon f£ probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00141-07

    Original file (00141-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error r injustice. This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02952-08

    Original file (02952-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in 15 Septembe reviewed in applicable considered all materia applicable considered dtd 21 Jul After caref the Board { establish 1 this conne contained i been denie furnished It is regrd favorable a reconsider or other ma regard, it regularity applying fo on the appl error or in Enclosure executive session, considered your application on r 2008. In addition, the Board the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00094-02

    Original file (00094-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N OF N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 .I LP: yrj Docket No: 94-02 18 June 2002 This is i n reference to your application t'or correction of your naval record p~rsuant to tlie provisions of title 10 of the IJnited States Code, scctiori 1552. A three-memhel- panel of the 13oarcl for ('orrection of Naval Keco~ds, sitting in executive session, considered your application o...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06061-08

    Original file (06061-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This is e naval rec A three-mé Records, applicatid injustice regulation Board. Your allegations of error and were reviewed in accordance with administrative S and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this cumentary material considered by the Board consisted plication, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. tly, when applying for a correction of an official ord, the burden is on the applicant to...