Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06477-08
Original file (06477-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
This is in
record purs

A three-me

Sitting in
15 Septembe
reviewed in
applicable f£
considered p
all materia

applicable §
considered

dtd 28 Jul t
After carefu
the Board fo
establish th
this connect
contained in
been denied,
furnished up
Tt is regret
favorable a
reconsider i
or other mat
regard, it i
regularity al
applying for

on the appli
error or inj

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

DIC

Docket No. 6477-08
15 September 2008

 

eference to your application for correction of your naval
ant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

er panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
xecutive session, considered your application on

2008. Your allegations of error and injustice were
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
o the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
y the Board consisted of your application, together with
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
tatutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
he advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1430 Ser 811/549
8, a copy of which is attached.

1 and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
und that the evidence submitted was insufficient to

e existence of probable material error or injustice. [In
ion, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be

on request.

ted that the circumstances of your case are such that
tion cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
ts decision upon submission of new and material evidence
ter not previously considered by the Board. In this

S important to keep in mind that a presumption of

ttaches to all official records. Consequently, when

a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
ant to demonstrate the existence of probable material

stice.

Sincerely,

\s

W. DEAN
Executive

    
 

or

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03912-07

    Original file (03912-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08545-10

    Original file (08545-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 2011. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10791-08

    Original file (10791-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentar of your application, your naval record and applicable statutes, support thereof, regulations and po advisory opinion, November 2008, e to your application for correction of your ant to the provisions of title 10 of the »l of the Board for Correction of Naval executive session, considered your rch 2009. by the Board consisted together with all material submitted in the Board considered the Marine Corps dated 7 licies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11086-08

    Original file (11086-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This is in referen naval record pursu United States Code A three-member pan Records, sitting i application on 3 March 2009. injustice were rev regulations and pr Board. 1 of the Board for Correction of Naval executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and Lhewed in accordance with administrative pcedures applicable to the proceedings of this y evidence considered by the Board consisted h, together with all material submitted in bur naval record and applicable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10504-08

    Original file (10504-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    E DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 RDZ:ecb Docket No. Your allegations of error and Lewed in accordance with administrative ocedures applicable to the proceedings of this lY evidence considered by the Board consisted nm, together with all material submitted in our naval record and applicable statutes, licies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10386-08

    Original file (10386-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    concurred with the Accordingly, your votes of the membe request. Your allegations of error and Zewed in accordance with administrative locedures applicable to the proceedings of this lY evidence considered by the Board consisted In, together with all material submitted in our naval record and applicable statutes, licies. Consequently, when|applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01659-09

    Original file (01659-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is en the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per references (a) through (d), recommend disapproval to the petitioner's request. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR} only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12292-08

    Original file (12292-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    “A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3974 14

    Original file (NR3974 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased father’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. NR3974-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11610-08

    Original file (11610-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You are entitled to have ° It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.