Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06061-08
Original file (06061-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

DIC
Docket No. 6061-08
5 September 2008

 

Dear (SPAR.

reference to your application for correction of your
rd pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

This is e
naval rec

A three-mé
Records,

applicatid
injustice
regulation
Board. Da
of your a

 

mber panel of the Board for Correction of Naval

itting in executive session, considered your

n on 4 September 2008. Your allegations of error and
were reviewed in accordance with administrative

S and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
cumentary material considered by the Board consisted
plication, together with all material submitted in

support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,

regulations and policies.

In addition, the Board considered the

advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1430 Ser 811/539 dtd 24

Jul 08, a

opy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material

error or injustice.

concurred
The Board

granting you relief.

Governing

year as thé EAOS.

by fiscal
bonus may
reenlistme

In this connection, the Board substantially
ith the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
lso found the following factors militated against

The extension was proper when executed.

egulations require reenlistment in the same fiscal

ear. Additionally, although any future reenlistment
rot be tax free, you will not be denied the
t bonus itself. Finally the Board found that by

granting yqur application, an undesired precedent may be set.
According
votes of
request.

 

It is re
that fav
the Boar
material
the Boar
a presum
Conseque
naval red
existence

Enclosure

ly, your application has been denied. The names and
the members of the panel will be furnished upon

retted that the circumstances of your case are such
rable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
evidence or other matter not previously considered by
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
tion of regularity attaches to all official records.
tly, when applying for a correction of an official

ord, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

  

W. DEAN PF]
Executive Di

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06932-08

    Original file (06932-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Dof-umentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thpreof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulationgb and policies. Those regulations are not arbitrary; rather, they are raltionally related to furthering the Navy’s legitimate interest in} managing reenlistment bonuses in various communities by fiscal year. Additionally, although any future reenlistment bonus may nbt be tax free, you will not be denied...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06093-08

    Original file (06093-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06049-08

    Original file (06049-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2008. Dotumentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence|of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06004-08

    Original file (06004-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, gitting in executive session, considered your applicatidn on 4 September 2008. your allegations of error and injustice |were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application. Those regulations are not arbitrary; rather, they are rationally related to furthering the Navy’s...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03754-08

    Original file (03754-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, gitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2008. Dodcumentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thlereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence|of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05534-08

    Original file (05534-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, gitting in executive session, considered your applicatidn on 4 September 2008. Ddcumentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support tHereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Those regulations are not arbitrary; rather, they are rationally related to furthering the Navy’s legitimate interest ih managing reenlistment...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05579-08

    Original file (05579-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03773-09

    Original file (03773-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ‘ A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 June 2009. Sincerely, TR QOD tomeae Foe W. DEAN PFEIFFER es | Executive Director ( Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL ROAD © QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5103 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1040 MMEA 26 May 09 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: BCNR DOCKET NO 03773-09; REQUEST...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08348-08

    Original file (08348-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official navai record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 3. after a review of all relevant information, this Headquarters concurs in the professional evaluation of a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01918-08

    Original file (01918-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of GLOn, of your United i Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Boar your application, together with all material submit thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes and policies. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and your letters of...