Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05032-08
Original file (05032-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

MEH
Docket No.
18 Sep 08

5032-08

 

 

This is in
record purs

A three-mem
sitting in
September 2
in accordan
applicable
considered
all materia
applicable
considered
of 8 Aug 08

After caref
the Board f
establish 4
this conned
contained jj

been denied.

reference to your application for correction of your naval
lant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

ber panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
executive session, considered your application on 18

008. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
ce with administrative regulations and procedures

to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material

Iby the Board consisted of your application, together with

1 submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1430 Ser 811/582
, a copy of which is attached.

ul and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
ound that the evidence submitted was insufficient to

he existence of probable material error or injustice. In
tion, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
n the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be

furnished upon request.

It is regre¢
favorable 4
reconsider

or other matter not previously considered by the Board.

regard, it
regularity
applying fo
on the app]
error or if

Enclosure

tted that the circumstances of your case are such that
ction cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
In this

is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when

ra correction of an official naval record, the burden is
icant to demonstrate the existence of probable material

njustice.

Sincerely,

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05150-08

    Original file (05150-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01282-08

    Original file (01282-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 September 2008. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memo 1560 MRRV of 22 Jul 08, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05868-08

    Original file (05868-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. 05868-08 18 August 2008 Dear

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05021-08

    Original file (05021-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    18 Sep 08 5021-08 Dear: This is in reference to your ap pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552. record A three-membb sitting in September 2 in accordante with administrative regula applicable considered Cy the Board consisted of your application, plication for correction of your naval er panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, xecutive session, considered your application on 18 08. khe advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo lul and conscientious consideration of the en ound...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06487-08

    Original file (06487-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02553-08

    Original file (02553-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00806-08

    Original file (00806-08.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    806-08 24 Mar 08This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 March 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05452-08

    Original file (05452-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07133-08

    Original file (07133-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 November 2008. Per references (a) and (b), recommend disapproval to the petitioner’s request. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06490-08

    Original file (06490-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memo 1780 BUPERS~-262G of 4 Aug 08, a copy of which is attached.