Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02952-08
Original file (02952-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

DIC
Docket No. 2952-08
15 September 2008

 

Dear &

This is in
record purs

 

reference to your application for correction of your naval
uant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,

sitting in
15 Septembe
reviewed in
applicable
considered
all materia
applicable
considered
dtd 21 Jul

After caref
the Board {
establish 1
this conne
contained i
been denie
furnished

 

It is regrd
favorable a
reconsider
or other ma
regard, it
regularity
applying fo
on the appl
error or in

Enclosure

executive session, considered your application on

r 2008. Your allegations of error and injustice were
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material

by the Board consisted of your application, together with

1 submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/512
08, a copy of which is attached.

ul and conscientious consideration of the entire record,

ound that the evidence submitted was insufficient to

he existence of probable material error or injustice. In

tion, the Board substantially concurred with the comments

n the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be

pon request.

tted that the circumstances of your case are such that
ction cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
tter not previously considered by the Board. In this

is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when

ra correction of an official naval record, the burden is
icant to demonstrate the existence of probable material

Justice.

   
 

\Was
Ww.” DEAN

Executive D

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07503-08

    Original file (07503-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06093-08

    Original file (06093-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05745-08

    Original file (05745-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-menber panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in Jexecutive session, considered your application on 15 Septembdr 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After carefull and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board fiona that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05907-08

    Original file (05907-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. We have carefully reviewed case and provide the following comments.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00944-08

    Original file (00944-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 August 2008. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 29 February 2008, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00196-08

    Original file (00196-08.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    196-08 11 March 2008 DearThis is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Per...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05588-08

    Original file (05588-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2009. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 18 July and 3 December 2008, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05372-08

    Original file (05372-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03901-08

    Original file (03901-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07545-08

    Original file (07545-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.