Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05607-08
Original file (05607-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT
BOARD FOR CORRECTION

2 NAVY A
WASHINGTON DC

 

 

This is in reference the applicati
mMaval record pursuant to the provi
|

|
IA three-member panel of the Board
Records, sitting in executive/ sess
application on 24 November 2008.
injustice were reviewed in ac¢orda
regulations and procedures applica
Board. Documentary material ¢onsi

regulations and policies. In addi
advisory opinions furnished by NST
and MCRC memo 1610 G-1 of 30 Jun Q
attached.

The Board also considered the requ
however they found that the igsue
documented and that a personal] ap

the issues involved. Thus,
appearance has been denied.

your ¥

1
t

After careful and conscientious c
record, the Board found that the

insufficient to establish the exi
error or injustice. In this ¢onn
concurred with the comments contail
provided by the Naval Service Trai
Board found there was no error or

d

 

 

OF NAVAL RECORDS
NEX
20370-5100

OF AL

MEH

Docket
25 Nov

 

on for corre
sions of 10

No.
08

5607-08

tion of your
SC 1552.

for Correction of Naval

ion, conside
Your allegat
nee with adm
ble to the p
dered by the

of your application, together with all materia
support thereof, your naval record and applica

tion, the Bo
C memo 1533
8, copies of

est for a pe}
in the case
earance with

equest for a

 

nsideration

ed your

ons of error and

nistrative

oceedings of this

Board consisted
submitted in

le statutes,

rd considered the

D4 of 30 Jun 08,

which are

rsonal appearance,
were adequately
or without

counsel would not materially add tio the Board’s understanding of

personal

£f the entire

vidence submitted was
tence of probable material

ction the Bo
ned in the ad
ning Command
injustice in

 

rd substantially
ivisory opinion
(NSTC) . The

the procedures
used or the evidence considered 1
Naval Reserve Officers Training cs
University or establishing the ed
Board found that the education rec
enhanced your opportunity for incy
employment potential.
Assistant Secretary of the Navy (M
acting on behalf of the Secretary
disenrollment, with recoupment of
2007. The Board found no compelli
Navas’s prior decision. According
denied. The names and votes of th
furnished upon request. .

Tt is regretted that the circyumsta
that favorable action cannot he ta
the Board reconsider its decision
material evidence or other matter
the Board. In this regard, it is
that a presumption of regularity a
records. Consequently, when apply
official naval record, the butden
demonstrate the existence of proba
injustice.

 

Enclosures

 

|

\p

Ww. DEAN PF
Executive D

disenrollin
rps (NROTC)

cational deb
eived, at go
eased life-l

anpower and
of the Navy,
scholarship f
ng reason to

ly, your appl
e members of

mces of your
ken. You are
upon submissi
mot previous!
also importan
ttaches to al
ing for a coy
is on the app

 

Sincerely,

 

you from the
nit at Auburn
Further, the
ernment expense,
ng earnings and

It was noted that Mr. William A. Navas,

eserve Affairs),
approved your
unds, on 10 May
disturb Mr.
ication has been
the panel will be

case are such
entitled to have
on of new and

y considered by

t to keep in mind
1 official

rection of an
licant to

ble material error or

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR683 14_Redacted

    Original file (NR683 14_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    three-member panel of che Board :or Correcc~on of Nava: Records, sitting in executive session, considered your applicacion on 22 January 2015 . warrant recharacterization of your discharge given the seriousness of your misconduct and request for discharge . Further, the Board concluded that you received the benefit of your bargain with the Marine Corps when your request for discharge was granted and should not be permitted to change it now .

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00126

    Original file (FD-2014-00126.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargeto(honorable)(general)(and)(tochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischarge),(and)(tochangethereenlistmentcode).TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE:...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11436 14

    Original file (NR11436 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ' ROARND FOR CORRECTION OF IN Oi &S, COURTING ULSE HOA — n reference naval peaama pursuant to the provis to your applica ions section 1552. United States Code, 4 Tm AL AVM a AVAL RECORDS ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HD Docket No: NR11436-14 bf ae Neramher 204 tion for correction of your of title 10 of the BA three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval = of Records, sitting in executive session, application on 11 December 2014 Your injustice were reviewed in accordance regulations...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10862-06

    Original file (10862-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Mann Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 20 No mber 2006, a copy of which is attached. In this conction, the Board substantially concurred with the comments cont ned in the report of the PERB, except it...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01683-01

    Original file (01683-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    P/ OF THE NAVY OF DC NAV4L OPERATION 203!iO-2000 S IN REPLY REFER TO 1301 SER N13/OlK094 25 April 2001 Head, Officer Personnel Plans and Policy Branch (N131) Board for Correction of Naval Records Coordinator (PERS-OOZCB) (1) Title 10, U. S. Code, Sectilln 653 - Minimum service requirement for certain flight crew positions. designation as a Naval Aviator as assigned an eight-year (ADSO) in accordance with Title ed to serve on designation as a Following his (l), Per Enclosure minimum service...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06344-06

    Original file (06344-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENTOF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORR CTION F NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVYANNEXWASHING ON DC 0370-5100MEH Docket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of our application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/07u0223 of 8 Mar 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01792-06

    Original file (01792-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Man e Corps, a copy of which is enclosed.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error o...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0080 14

    Original file (NR0080 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NROOO8O-14 7 July 2014 in reference to your recent Application for Correction A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR568 14_Redacted

    Original file (NR568 14_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although your appli cation was not filed in a timely manner, the Board found it in the interest of jus t ice to waive the statute of limitations and consider your ~pplication on its merits _ A three - member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in execut ive session, considered your application on 3 February 2015 . Regarding your claim of PTSD, the Board may only consider assertion of PTSD when an applicant Rresents clear evidence that the PTSD is service connected...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00637

    Original file (FD-2013-00637.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDBEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVJCEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSANFOIAException(b)(6) TYPEHON I PERSONALAPPEARANCE x I RECORD REVIEW NAM £ OFCOUNSELANDORORCANIZATION ADDRESSANDORORCANl7\TIONOPCOUNSELVI'S Nox ' VOTEOFTHEBO MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) FOIAException(b)(6) X+ ,_ ISSUES A94.05 INDEXNUMBEK A28.10 •},; l:: 1ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPUCATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETIEROFNOTIFICATION...