Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05145-02
Original file (05145-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP:ddj
Docket No: 5145-02
24 September 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section

1552.

 

A three-member panel of the Board   for Correction  of Naval Records, sitting in executive
611 24 September 2002. Your allegations of error and
session, considered your application  
,in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
injustice were reviewed  
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser
copy of which is attached.

N130C3/02U0477 of 5 September 2002, a

 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS

2000  NAVY PENTAGON

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20350-2000

Hk 

IN 

Y P, 
N13OC3/  

722 0
Ser 
5 Sep 2002

1”

iir!-rR 
02UO477

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION

OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB

Ref:

Encl:

(a) Military Pay Advisory (MPA)  
(b) DOD Directive 1327.5 of 24 Sep 85

81/00

(1) BCNR Case File  

Record

#05145-02  w/Microfiche Service

Per your request,

1.
enclosure (1) is provided.

the following recommendation concerning

2.
Enclosure (1) indicates a request for reinstatement of 14
days leave lost at the end of FY-00 while transferring to his
new Permanent Duty Station (PDS).

Defense Joint Military Pay System-Active component  

3.
AC) uses the Last-In-First-Out (LIFO) rule to determine what
leave is charged when a member uses leave.
DFAS-Cleveland received a ruling that LIFO is the correct
method and effective immediately DFAS-CL will no longer make
adjustment of leave balances to minimize leave lost at the
end of the FY based on the LIFO rule.

IAW reference (a)

(DJMS-

para.

IAW reference (b)  

6.16-2, service members who are
4.
assigned to a designated deployable ship, operating away from
homeport  for 60 days or more,
leave when operational mission
leave utilization.
in defense of national security must have caused the
situation preventing the service

requirements prohibit normal
A national emergency/crisis or operation

members from using leave.

may accumulate up to 90 days of

Assistant Head, Pay and

Allowances Section  

(N130C)



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08112-01

    Original file (08112-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. AC) uses the Last-In-First-Out (LIFO) rule to determine what IAW reference leave is charged when a member takes leave.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03062-01

    Original file (03062-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD X 2 NAVY ANNE S WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP: ddj Docket No: 3062-01 5 September 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04403-01

    Original file (04403-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 4403-01 10 October 200 1 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title Ilnited States Code, section 10 of the 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your proceedings application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02687-01

    Original file (02687-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. AC) uses the Last-In-First-Out (LIFO) rule to determine what IAW reference leave is charged when a member takes leave.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05447-03

    Original file (05447-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2003. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 00132-04

    Original file (00132-04.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 March 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00167-02

    Original file (00167-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N which is attached. Enclosure (1) indicates a request for retroactive payment of Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) at the w/dependent rate for vice his Permanent...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05929-02

    Original file (05929-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. IAW reference (b), payment of BAH at dependent location is A review of the petitioner's Master Military The reasons listed by - 4.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05377-08

    Original file (05377-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 September 2008. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandums 7220 N130C3/08U0636 and7220 N130C3/08U0638 of 4 September 2008, a copy each is attached. N130C recommends disapproval of the petitioner’s request to draw BAH at the with-dependent rate for the time period of 1 Mar 96 to 23 Apr 02. jrye Sud D. Silva Assistant, Pay...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00833-01

    Original file (00833-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.