Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05999-03
Original file (05999-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE  NAVY 

B O A R D   F O R   C O R R E C T I O N   OF  NAVAL  R E C O R D S  

2  N A V Y A N N E X  

W A S H I N G T O N   D C   2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0  

LCC:ecb 
Docket No:  5999-03 
15 October 2003 

This is in  reference to  your application for correction of  your  naval  record pursuant to the 
provisions of  title  10 of  the United  States Code,  section  1552. 

A  three-member panel of  the Board  for  Correction of  Naval  Records,  sitting in  executive session, 
considered your  application on  15 October 2003.  Your allegations of  error and  injustice were 
reviewed  in accordance with  administrative regulations and  procedures applicable to the 
proceedings of  this Board.  Documentary  material considered by  the Board consisted of  your 
application, together with  all material submitted in  support thereof, your  naval  record  and 
applicable statutes, regulations and  policies.  In  addition, the Board  considered the advisory 
opinion  furnished by  CNO memorandum  7220 Ser N130C3/03U0677 dated 24  September 2003, a 
copy of  which  is attached. 

After careful and  conscientious consideration of  the entire record, the Board  found  that the 
evidence submitted was  insufficient to establish the existence of  probable material error or 
injustice.  In  this connection, the Board  substantially concurred with  the comments contained in 
the advisory opinion.  Accordingly,  your  application has been  denied.  The names and  votes of 
the members of  the panel  will  be  furnished upon  request. 

It  is regretted that  the circumstances of  your  case are such  that favorable action cannot be taken. 
You  are entitled  to  have the Board  reconsider its decision upon  submission of  new  and  material 
evidence or other  matter not previously considered by  the Board.  In  this regard, it is important 
to  keep  in  mind  that a presumption  of  regularity attaches to all official records.  Consequently, 
when  applying for a correction of  an  official naval  record, the burden  is on  the applicant to 
demonstrate the existence of  probable material error or injustice. 

Sincerely, 

Enclosure 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

OFFICE O F  THE CHIEF O F  NAVAL OPERATIONS 

2 0 0 0  NAVY  PENTAGON 

WASHINGT0N.D.C. 20350-2000 

IN  R E P L Y   REFER  T O :  

7220 
Ser Nl3 OC3 /03~O677 
24 Sep 2003 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTIONS 

OF NAVAL RECORDS 

Via : 

Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB 

Subj : 

Ref: 

(a) DODFMR Volume 7 A ,   Chapter 26, May 03 

Encl : 

(1) BCNR Case File #04093-03 

1.  Per your request, the following recommendation concerning 
enclosure  (1) is provided. 

2.  Enclosure  (1) indicates a request to draw Basic Allowance 
for Housing  (BAH) type I at the w/dependent rate for Annandale, 
VA due to dependents moving back to United States prior to 
transferring from a OCONUS Permanent Duty Station (PDS). 

3.  IAW reference (a) Secretary of defense determines BAH type I 
rates and locations for all members in a Military Housing Area 
(MHA) based on the members Permanent Duty Station  (PDS) in CONUS. 
IAW reference  (a) paragraph 260101-F Overseas Housing Allowance 
(OHA) rates are determined by the Per Diem Travel and 
Transportation Allowance Committee.  A review of the petitioner's 
Master Military Pay Account  (MMPA) revealed that he reported for 
duty to Comrnancl.?r SEVENTH F l c r - t  , which is an OCONUS Permanent 
Duty Station where his OHA was started IAW reference (a).  Once 
the dependents departed the OCONUS PDS and returned to Annandale, 
VA, the members OHA stops.  The petitioner is entitled to BAH 
type I1 until executing a Permanent Change-Of-Station (PCS) 
orders and reporting to a PDS in CONUS toeligible for BAH type I 
rates. 

4.  N130C recommends disapproval of the petitioner's request to 

draw BAH type I. 

Assistant Head, Pay and 

Allowances Section (N130C) 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06094-03

    Original file (06094-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Enclosure (1) indicates a request to draw Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) type I at the w/dependent rate for Oakland, CA due to dependents moving...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05081-03

    Original file (05081-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. A review of enclosure (1) revealed that the petitioner was E-4 (frock to Second Class Petty Officer) for pay purposes...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04093-03

    Original file (04093-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08675-00

    Original file (08675-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this case the member's old PDS was not OCONUS so this article of the JFTR does not apply. 4. reassigned from a PDS in DC) and his dependents remained in the same residence as when the IAW reference (a) article U5222- member served at the old PDS.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02409-03

    Original file (02409-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board cons application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered tl opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser which is attached. the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05929-02

    Original file (05929-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. IAW reference (b), payment of BAH at dependent location is A review of the petitioner's Master Military The reasons listed by - 4.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02462-02

    Original file (02462-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05603-02

    Original file (05603-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02615-02

    Original file (02615-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser which is attached. the following recommendation concerning Enclosure (1) indicates a request to draw Basic Allowance 2. for Housing (BAH) at the w/dependent rate for Chicago,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01426-02

    Original file (01426-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser attached. Enclosure (1) indicates a request to draw Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) at the w/dependent rate for Los Angeles, CA (dependent location) vice New Orleans, LA (new duty station).