Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05106-03
Original file (05106-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE  NAVY 

B O A R D   F O R   C O R R E C T I O N   O F   N A V A L   R E C O R D S  

2  N A V Y   ANNEX 

W A S H I N G T O N  DC  20370-5100 

LCC:ecb 
Docket No:  5106-03 
15 October 2003 

This is in  reference to  your  application for correction of  your  naval  record pursuant to the 
provisions of  title  10 of  the United States Code, section  1552. 

A  three-member panel of  the Board  for Correction of  Naval  Records,  sitting in  executive session, 
considered your application on  15 October 2003.  Your  allegations of  error and  injustice were 
reviewed  in  accordance with  administrative regulations and  procedures applicable to the 
proceedings of  this Board.  Documentary material  considered by  the Board  consisted of  your 
application, together with  all  material submitted in  support thereof, your naval record and 
applicable statutes, regulations and  policies.  In  addition, the Board  considered the advisory 
opinion  furnished by  CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N130C3103U0637 dated  5 September 2003, a 
copy of  which  is attached. 

After  careful and  conscientious consideration of  the entire record,  the Board  found that the 
evidence submitted  was  insufficient to establish  the existence of  probable material error or 
injustice.  In  this connection, the Board  substantially concurred with  the comments contained in 
the advisory opinion.  Auodingly,  your application  has been  denied.  The names and  votes of 
the  members of  the panel  will  be  furnished upon  request. 

It is regretted that  the circumstances of  your case are such  that favorable action cannot be taken. 
You  are entitled to have the Board  reconsider its decision  upon  submission of  new  and  material 
evidence or other matter  not  previously considered by  the Board.  In  this regard, it is important 
to keep in  mind  that a presumption of  regularity attaches to  all official records.  Consequently, 
when  applying for a correction of  an  official naval  record, the burden  is on  the applicant to 
demonstrate the existence of  probable material error or injustice. 

Sincerely, 

Executive Direct 

Enclosure 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF O F  NAVAL OPERATIONS 

2 0 0 0  NAVY PENTAGON 

WASHINGT0N.D.C. 20350-2000 

IN R E P L Y   R E F E R   TO: 

7220 
Ser Nl3 0C3 / 03U0637 
5 Sep 2003 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION 

OF NAVAL RECORDS 

Via : 

Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB 

Sub j : 

REOUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICO 

Ref: 

(a) SECNAVINST 1900.7G 

Encl: 

(1) BCNR Case File #05106-03 w/Microfiche Service 

Record 

1.  Per your request, the following recommendation concerning 
enclosure (1) is provided. 

2.  Enclosure (1) indicates a request for separation pay full 
vice half during his discharge from active duty on 13 March 2003. 

3.  A review of enclosure (I), revealed that the petitioner was 
discharged from active duty on 13 March 2003 due to "physical 
standards".  IAW reference (a), a member's separation under this 
category are eligible to separation pay  (half).  Therefore N130C 
recommends disapproval of the petitioner's request for separation 
pay  (full) IAW reference (a) . 

Assistant Head, Pay and 

Allowances Section (N130C) 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05999-03

    Original file (05999-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. IAW reference (a) Secretary of defense determines BAH type I rates and locations for all members in a Military Housing Area (MHA) based on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05081-03

    Original file (05081-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. A review of enclosure (1) revealed that the petitioner was E-4 (frock to Second Class Petty Officer) for pay purposes...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06094-03

    Original file (06094-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Enclosure (1) indicates a request to draw Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) type I at the w/dependent rate for Oakland, CA due to dependents moving...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 08786-98

    Original file (08786-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02409-03

    Original file (02409-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board cons application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered tl opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser which is attached. the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00118-03

    Original file (00118-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03467-03

    Original file (03467-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser of which is attached. FL) vice his Permanent Duty Allowance of Record Station Naval IAW reference (a) BAH entitlement is based on the member's 3.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08158-00

    Original file (08158-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04093-03

    Original file (04093-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03390-99

    Original file (03390-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 January 2000. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER copy of which is attached. D.C. 20350-2000 Y IN REPLY REFER TO 722 0 Ser 20 DEC 99 N130C3/220- -99 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL...