Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04330-03
Original file (04330-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE  NAVY 

B O A R D F O R  C O R R E C T I O N   O F   NAVAL  R E C O R D S  

2  NAVY  ANNEX 

W A S H I N G T O N   D C   2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0  

JLP:ecb 
Docket No:  4330-03 
15 October 2003 

Dear  SEAMAN- 

This is in  reference to  your application for correction of  your  naval  record pursuant to the 
provisions of  title 10 of the United States Code, section  1552. 

A  three-member panel of the Board  for  Correction of Naval  Records,  sitting in  executive session, 
considered your application on  15 October 2003.  Your  allegations of error and  injustice were 
reviewed in accordance with  administrative regulations and  procedures applicable to the 
proceedings of  this Board.  Documentary material considered by  the Board  consisted of  your 
application, together with  all  material submitted in  support thereof, your  naval  record and 
applicable statutes, regulations and  policies.  In  addition, the Board  considered the advisory 
opinion  furnished by  NAVRESFOR  letter 5420 Ser N111149 dated  20 August 2003, a copy of 
which  is attached. 

1 

After careful and  conscientious consideration of  the entire record, the Board  found that the 
evidence submitted was insufficient to  establish the existence of  probable material error or 
injustice.  In  this connection,  the Board  substantially concurred with  the comments contained in 
the advisory opinion.  Accordingly, your application has  b u l l  d c n i d .   The nlaiws and votes of 
the members of  the panel  will  be  furnished upon  request. 

It  is regretted that  the circumstances of  your case are such  that  favorable action cannot be taken. 
You  are entitled to  have the Board  reconsider its decision upon  submission of  new  and  material 
evidence or other matter  not previously considered by  the Board.  In  this regard, it is important 
to keep in  mind  that a presumption  of regularity attaches to all official records.  Consequently, 
when  applying for a correction of  an official naval  record,  the burden  is on  the applicant to 
demonstrate the existence of  probable material error or injustice. 

t 

Sincerely, 

Enclosure 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

COMMANDER NAVAL RESERVE FORCE 

4400 DAUPHINE STREET 

NEW ORLEANS. LOUISIANA  70146-5046 

IN REPLY REFER TO 

5420 
Ser N11/149 
20 Aug 03 

From:  Commander, Naval Reserve Force 
To : 

Board for Correction of Naval Records  , 

Subj : 

IN THE CASE OF 
(DOCKET NO. :  4330-03) 

Ref : 

(a) COMNAVRESFORINST 1001.5D 

1.  Returned recommending disapproval.  Reference  (a), does not 
list any provisions for being advanced based on the receipt of 
an Associates degree. 

2 .   Point of contact at this command is AZ1 (AW)- 

at 

commercial (504) 678-6158 or DSN 678-6158, or e-mail t 

Id 

By direction 

Copy to: 
NAVMARCORESCEN Shreveport 

--mmm 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04352-03

    Original file (04352-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05067-03

    Original file (05067-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL R E C O R D S 2 NAVY ANNEX W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 5067-03 10 October 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04060-03

    Original file (04060-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO: 5420 Nl3 OD1 / 03U0679 24 Sep 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF 0 Y Encl : (1) BCNR case file #04060-03 The following provides comment and recommendation on petition. requests favorable action that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01420-03

    Original file (01420-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. D.C. 20350-2000 I N R E P L Y R E F E R T O 5420 Nl3 OD1 / 03110236 26 Mar 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS E CASE OF I Encl:...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05512-03

    Original file (05512-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material 'error or injustice. In accordance with BUPERS message 2011002 JUL 01 (message in effect at the time entering the Nuclear Field program and shipping to active duty between December 2001 and May...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07955-01

    Original file (07955-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consi stetl of your application, together with all nlaterial sub~nittetl in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 111 addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 5420 Ser P80B10305 of 2 1 December 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an ofticial naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05999-03

    Original file (05999-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. IAW reference (a) Secretary of defense determines BAH type I rates and locations for all members in a Military Housing Area (MHA) based on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00320-03

    Original file (00320-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. D.C. 20350-2000 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO 5420 N13 OD1 / 0 3 ~ 0 2 4 5 26 Mar 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN APPRENTICE . In his petition, Seaman Apprentice a requests favorable action that would allow payment of a $2,000 EB College Kicker.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00529-03

    Original file (00529-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. In his petition, Petty Officer was told at the Charlotte MEPS that he was not el He requests favorable action that will allow payment of an EB. Every recruit is not offc~ed n"l- r ~ c e i i r e ~ an EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05106-03

    Original file (05106-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N130C3103U0637 dated 5 September 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.