Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04060-03
Original file (04060-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT  OF THE  NAVY 

B O A R D  F O R   C O R R E C T I O N   OF  N A V A L  R E C O R D S  

2  N A V Y A N N E X  

W A S H I N G T O N   D C   2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0  

JLP:ecb 
Docket No:  4060-03 
15 October 2003 

This is in  reference to your application for correction of  your  naval  record pursuant to the 
provisions of  title 10 of  the United  States Code, section  1552. 

A  three-member'panel of  the Board  for Correction of  Naval  Records,  sitting in  executive session, 
considered your  application on  15 October 2003.  Your  allegations of  error and  injustice were 
reviewed  in  accordance with  administrative regulations and  procedures applicable to  the 
proceedings of  this Board.  Documentary material considered by  the Board  consisted of  your 
application, together with  all material submitted in  support thereof, your naval  record  and 
applicable statutes, regulations and  policies.  In  addition, the Board  considered the advisory 
opinion furnished by  CNO memorandum 5420 Nl3OD lIO3UO679 dated 24  September 2003, a 
copy of  which  is attached. 

After  careful and  conscientious consideration of  the entire record, the Board  found that the 
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of  probable material error or 
injustice.  In  this connection, the Board  substantially concurred with  the comments contained in 
the advisory opinion.  Aciordingly, you1 appliiar ion  has been  denied.  The names and  votes of 
the members of  the panel will be furnished upon  request. 

It is regretted that the circumstances of  your  case are such  that  favorable action cannot be taken. 
You  are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision  upon  submission of  new  and  material 
evidence or other matter  not previously considered by  the Board.  In  this regard, it is important 
to keep in  mind  that a presumption  of  regularity attaches to all official records.  Consequently, 
when  applying for a correction of  an  official naval  record, the burden  is on  the applicant to 
demonstrate the existence of  probable material error or injustice. 

Sincerely, 

Enclosure 

DEPARTMENT O F  THE NAVY 

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF O F  NAVAL OPERATIONS 

2 0 0 0  NAVY PENTAGON 

WASHINGT0N.D.C. 20350-2000 

IN REPLY  REFER  TO: 

5420 
Nl3 OD1 /  03U0679 
24  Sep  2003 

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF 

NAVAL RECORDS 

Subj:  COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF 0 Y 

Encl :  (1) BCNR case file #04060-03 

The following provides comment and recommendation on 

petition. 

2 .   N130 recommends disapproval of -petition 
for Navy College Fund  (NCF). 

entered the Delayed Entry Program  (DEP) on 

2002 and volunteered for Airman Apprenticeship 

Training and an Enlistment Bonus of $1,000. 
requests favorable action that would allow the addition of NCF 
to his contract. 

4.  NCF is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the 
discretion of recruiters and classifiers to entice individuals 
is not offered nor 
to enlist in critical skills 
receives the NCF provision. 
does not have a NCF 
contract in his service record and therefore is not entitled to 
an NCF EB.  No further action is necessary. 

5.  BCNR case file with microfiche service record is returned 
herewith as enclosure  (1). 

Programs Branch 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 08115-98

    Original file (08115-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. -is not entitled to both NCF and EB, and therefore is no longer eligible for EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01420-03

    Original file (01420-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. D.C. 20350-2000 I N R E P L Y R E F E R T O 5420 Nl3 OD1 / 03110236 26 Mar 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS E CASE OF I Encl:...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00320-03

    Original file (00320-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. D.C. 20350-2000 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO 5420 N13 OD1 / 0 3 ~ 0 2 4 5 26 Mar 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN APPRENTICE . In his petition, Seaman Apprentice a requests favorable action that would allow payment of a $2,000 EB College Kicker.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00529-03

    Original file (00529-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. In his petition, Petty Officer was told at the Charlotte MEPS that he was not el He requests favorable action that will allow payment of an EB. Every recruit is not offc~ed n"l- r ~ c e i i r e ~ an EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00036-03

    Original file (00036-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Petty Officer College Kicker EB contract in his service record and therefore is not entitled to a College Kicker EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05512-03

    Original file (05512-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material 'error or injustice. In accordance with BUPERS message 2011002 JUL 01 (message in effect at the time entering the Nuclear Field program and shipping to active duty between December 2001 and May...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01458-03

    Original file (01458-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. D.C. 20350-2000 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO 5420 N13 OD1 / 03210239 26 Mar 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10564-02

    Original file (10564-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Recorda, sitting in executive session, considered your application on May 6, 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The following provides comment and recommendation on Seaman petition.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00761-03

    Original file (00761-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In his petition, action that would allow paym CF Program quests favorable EB College Kicker.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05067-03

    Original file (05067-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL R E C O R D S 2 NAVY ANNEX W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 5067-03 10 October 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record...