DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD F O R C O R R E C T I O N OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON D C 20370-5100
JLP:ddj
Docket No: 320-03
8 April 2003
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 N130D1103U0245 of 26 March 2003, a copy of
which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF T H E N A V Y
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS
2000 NAVY PENTAGON
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20350-2000
IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO
5420
N13 OD1 / 0 3 ~ 0 2 4 5
26 Mar 2003
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN APPRENTICE
.
k
o
.-.
Encl: (1) BCNR case file #00320-03 with microfiche service record
1. The following provides comment and recommendation on Seaman
~~~rentic-
2. N130 recommends denial of Seaman rentice ice-etition
for an Enlistment Bonus (EB) College Kicker.
petition.
3. Seaman ~ ~ ~ r e n t i c - entered the Navy through the Delayed
Entry Program (DEP) on 18 December 2001, volunteered for the
Advanced Electronics Computer Field, and si.gned an EB Contract for
a $10,000 EB. He shipped to Recruit Training Co nd (RTC) on 25
March 2002. In his petition, Seaman Apprentice a requests
favorable action that would allow payment of a $2,000 EB College
Kicker.
4 . Seaman ~ ~ ~ r e n t i c e l ) has a valid EB contract in the amount
or $10,000 and is entitled to that payment upon completion of his
training pipeline and qualification in the skill for which he was
offered the EB. The College Kicker EB is not an entitlement, but
a recruiting tool used at the discretion of recruiters and
classifiers to entice individuals to enlist in critical skills.
Every recruit is not offered not receives and EB or an EB College
does not have a College Kicker EB
Kicker. Seaman Apprentic
contract in his service
therefore is not entitled to a
College Kicker EB.
6. BCNR case file with microfiche service record is returned
herewith as enclosure (1).
I
- ~ e a d , Enlisted Bonuc
Programs Branch
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07245-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FORCORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP : ddj Docket No: 26 November 2002 7245-02 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. h A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. In addition, the Board considered the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07147-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. N130 recommends denial of Seaman Apprentice 2. petition for an Enlistment Bonus (EB) College Ki of $3,000. He shipped to Recruit Training Command (RTC) on 1 e entered the Navy through the 29 March 2002, volunteered for the Seaman Apprentice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04972-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition; the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01458-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. D.C. 20350-2000 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO 5420 N13 OD1 / 03210239 26 Mar 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01420-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. D.C. 20350-2000 I N R E P L Y R E F E R T O 5420 Nl3 OD1 / 03110236 26 Mar 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS E CASE OF I Encl:...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05739-02
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130D1/ 29 Ott 2002 02UO582 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF, I T Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05739-02 with microfiche service record 1. Every recruit is not offered nor The EB program is budgeted based Navy Recruiting Command and Seaman,mhas a valid EB Contract...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10564-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Recorda, sitting in executive session, considered your application on May 6, 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The following provides comment and recommendation on Seaman petition.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00762-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. N130 recommends disapproval of for an Enlistment Bonus (EB) Colleg 3.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07284-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 N which is attached. An EB College Kicker is an EB and is governed Every recruit is not offered nor Navy Recruiting Command and the Seaman Apprentice Garcia has a valid EB Contract in the amount 5 .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07383-02
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 20350-2000 54rQl@PLV REFER TO N130D1/02U0589 29 Ott 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, NAVAL RECORDS BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF Subj : HE CASE 0 Encl: (1) BCNR case file #07383-02 with microfiche service...