DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY
BOARD FOR C O R R E C T I O N OF N A V A L R E C O R D S
2 NAVY ANNEX
W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0
JLP:ecb
Docket No: 4952-03
15 October 2003
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 15 October 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by CNRF letter 5420 Ser N11115 1 dated 20 August 2003, a copy of which is
attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your appl.iua~ion has bmrl drnictl. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
COMMANDER NAVAL RESERVE FORCE
4400 DAUPHINE STREET
NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA 70148-5046
From :
To :
Commander, Naval Reserve Force
Board for 'correction of Naval Records
IN REPLY REFER TO:
5420
Ser N11/ 151
20 Aug 03
Sub j :
APPLICATION FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORD (DD FORM
149) IN THE CASE C
-
-(DOCKET
NO.: 04952-03)
Ref:
(a) BUPERSINST 1430.163
1. Returned, recommending disapproval. Currently SK2 is
overmanned at 117% and approval of this request would further
limit advancement opportunities in the Storekeeper rating.
Additionally, upon initial enlistment in the Naval Reserve, SN
1II) required an ASVAB waiver due to her scores not meeting
the minimum requirement for Storekeeper.
2 . Point of contact at this command is PNC(AW) -at
or DSN 678-5167, or email
Copy to:
NAVMARCORESCEN San Diego
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04330-03
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL R E C O R D S 2 NAVY ANNEX W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 JLP:ecb Docket No: 4330-03 15 October 2003 Dear SEAMAN- This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 07398-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You reenlisted on 22 April 1999, after the date establishing the Selected Reserve Bonus Program.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01420-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. D.C. 20350-2000 I N R E P L Y R E F E R T O 5420 Nl3 OD1 / 03110236 26 Mar 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS E CASE OF I Encl:...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07955-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consi stetl of your application, together with all nlaterial sub~nittetl in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 111 addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 5420 Ser P80B10305 of 2 1 December 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an ofticial naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05067-03
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL R E C O R D S 2 NAVY ANNEX W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 5067-03 10 October 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00529-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. In his petition, Petty Officer was told at the Charlotte MEPS that he was not el He requests favorable action that will allow payment of an EB. Every recruit is not offc~ed n"l- r ~ c e i i r e ~ an EB.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04896-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 October 2003. At the time of his BOI, it was customary to only file BOI findings in an officer's record if the findings included a recommendation to discharge the officer. The BOI findings not being included in his official record did not make his record incorrect, nor did it disadvan.tage him during the selection boards.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04060-03
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO: 5420 Nl3 OD1 / 03U0679 24 Sep 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF 0 Y Encl : (1) BCNR case file #04060-03 The following provides comment and recommendation on petition. requests favorable action that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00028-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (a) request comments and recommendations in subject officer's case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05512-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material 'error or injustice. In accordance with BUPERS message 2011002 JUL 01 (message in effect at the time entering the Nuclear Field program and shipping to active duty between December 2001 and May...