Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04075-03
Original file (04075-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT  OF THE  NAVY 

BOARD  FOR  CORRECTION  OF  NAVAL  RECORDS 

2  N A V Y A N N E X  

WASHINGTON  DC  20370-5100 

LCC:ecb 
Docket No:  4075-03 
5 August 2003 

This is in reference to your application for correction of  your  naval record pursuant to the 
provisions of  title 10 of  the United States Code, section  1552. 

A three-member panel of  the Board  for Correction of  Naval  Records, sitting in  executive session, 
considered your application on  5 August 2003.  Your allegations of error and  injustice were 
reviewed in  accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the 
proceedings of  this Board.  Documentary material considered by  the Board consisted of  your 
application, together with  all material submitted in  support thereof,  your naval record and 
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.  In addition, the Board  considered the advisory 
opinion furnished by  NPC memorandum  1430 Ser 8 1 1 A 11346 dated  17 July 2003, a copy of 
which is attached. 

After careful and  conscientious consideration of  the entire record, the Board found that the 
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or 
injustice.  In  this connection, the Board  substantially concurred with  the comments contained in 
the advisory opinion.  Accordingly,  your application has been  denied.  The names and  votes of 
the members of  the panel will be furnished upon  request. 

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. 
You  are entitled to have the Board  reconsider its decision upon  submission of  new  and  material 
evidence or other matter  not previously considered by  the Board.  In  this regard, it is important 
to keep in  mind  that a presumption of  regularity attaches to all official records.  Consequently, 
when  applying for a correction of an  official naval record, the burden is on  the applicant to 
demonstrate the existence of  probable material error or injustice. 

Sincerely, 

Enclosure 

1430 
Ser 811A1/ 33b 
17 Jul 03 

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL 

RECORDS (BCNR) 

Via:  Assistant for BCNR Matters  (PERS-OOXCB) 

Subj:  COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF 

Ref: 

(a) BUPERSINST 1430.163 

Encl : 

(1) BCNR file #04075-03 

1.  Based on policy and guidelines established in reference (a), 
enclosure (1) is returned recommending disapproval. 

he was selected for Petty Officer Third 

2. -stated 
Class while on active duty.  However, he separated from active 
duty on 20 November 1997 prior to his pay date of 16 December 
1997, which resulted in his separation from active duty in 
paygrade E-3.  Authority to effect such advancement expired on 31 
December 1997.  No relief can be recommended regarding this 
petition. 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04365-03

    Original file (04365-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04568-03

    Original file (04568-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, hv Executive Director Enclosure DIPARIMBWT OF TI41 NAVY 1430 Ser 8llAl/ 351 17 Jul 03 MEMORANDUM FOR...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09593-02

    Original file (09593-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05720-03

    Original file (05720-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03834-03

    Original file (03834-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05431-03

    Original file (05431-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05825-03

    Original file (05825-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. is requesting to be advanced to HM2 due 2. to an administrative error in processing his award points.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10603-02

    Original file (10603-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02168-99

    Original file (02168-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02354-03

    Original file (02354-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVYANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 2Ot 10 June t 2354-03 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record purs provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. mt to the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in considered your application on 10 June 2003. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and...