DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVYANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
LCC:ddj
Docket No:
2Ot
10 June
t
2354-03
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record purs
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
mt to the
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in
considered your application on 10 June 2003.
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board cons
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 8 11 A
attached.
In addition, the Board considered
l/2 17 of 6 May 2003,
Your allegations of error and
injt
applicabl
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board fou
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
materi:
commel
nam
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
ne
In this regard
cecutive session,
tice were
to the
#ted of your
zord and
e advisory
copy of which is
d that the
error or
s contained in
s and votes of
mnot be taken.
I and material
it is important
Tonsequently,
lplican t to
Sincerely,
W. DEAN
:
Executive
C
FEIFFER
Tector
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN
38055-0000
1430
Ser 8 1
06 Ma y
MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION
RECORDS (BCNR)
Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOXCB)
Via:
Subj
11217
3
NAVAL
Ref:
(a) BUPERSINST 1430.163
Encl:
(1) BCNR file
#02354-03
Based on policy and guidelines established in
1.
enclosure (1) is returned with the following action.
refere
e (a),
September 1997
2 .
Petty Officer
points awarded sin
award points.
Petty Officer
EXAM CYCLE
Cycle 152, September 1996
Cycle 155, March 1997
Cycle 156,
Cycle 159, March 1998
Cycle 160,
Cycle 163, March 1999
Cycle 164,
Cycle 167, March 2000
Cycle 168,
Cycle 171, March 200 1
Cycle 172,
Cycle 175, March 2002
Cycle 176,
September 1998
September 2002
September 1999
September 2001
September 2000
requested a review
due to
miscalculati
chronologic history fo
award
of
adding
award points:
LOC, NAM, GCM
LOC, NAM, GCM
LOC, NAM, GCM
LOC 2, NAM, GCM
LOC 2, NAM, GCM
LOC 2, NAM, GCM 2
LOC 2, NAM, GCM 2
LOC 2, NAM, GCM 2
LOC 2, NAM, GCM 2
LOC 2,' NAM, GCM 2
LOC 2, NAM, GCM 2
LOC 2, NAM, GCM 3
LOC 2, NAM, GCM 3
POIN
5
5
5
6
6
8
8
8
8
8
8
10
10
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 00450-04
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00071-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430 SER which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04272-06
Chief Petty Officer XXXX was selected to Senior Chief Petty Officer with an effective date of 16 December 1998.b. BCNR ltr LCC:ddj Docket No: 9653-02 of 1 April 2003, directed Chief retroactive advancement to Senior Chief Petty Officer be effective since there was no advisory indicating he was not in an eligible status to be advanced on that date. RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF HMCM Per reference (c), Chief XXXX new Time in Rate established his first eligibility for consideration to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05855-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. This is an advisory memorandum for the use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05825-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. is requesting to be advanced to HM2 due 2. to an administrative error in processing his award points.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06557-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The FMS required for advancement to MS2 for that cycle was 181.58. in the March 1994 (Cycle 143) Navywide 3.-was credited with 4 award points for Cycle 143.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 01590-04
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05921-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 4811E9/064, 7 February 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07290-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 8llE9/535, of 16 November 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 08627-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ;ill material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. If a member is denied an opportunity to participate in a Navywide examination and if selected for advancement through participation in a subsequent examination, a member may request a backdated advancement. Therefore, no relief is recommended in this case.