Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01815-01
Original file (01815-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

JLP: ddj
Docket No:  
12 June 2001

1815-01

This is in reference to your applic
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

r correction of your naval record pursuant to the

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 12 June 200 1. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220  
which is attached.

N130C3/01U02 14 of 21 May 2001, a copy of

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE
OFFICE OF

  THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATION

2000 NAVY PENTAGO

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20350-200

  NAV Y
N

0

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION

OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB

(a) MILPERSMAN
(b) SECNAVINST 

1050.5C

(1)  BCNR Case File 

Record

#01815-01  w/Microfiche Service

S

I

IN REPLY REFER TO
OlUO214

7220
Nl3UC3/  
21 May 2001

Per your request,

1.
provided.

the following recommendation concerning enc

losure  

(

1) is

2. Enclosure (1) indicates a request for reinstatement of 18 days
that was lost at the end of FY 99.

accrued leave

3.  A review of the  petitioner's Master Military Pay Account (MMPA) revealed that
the member lost 14.5 days leave at the end of FY 99.
reference (a),
excess of 60  days at the end of the fiscal year due to not having adequate
opportunity to reduce leave balances during the fiscal year.
Iof accrued leave is the sole responsibility of the member, except under specific
circumstances that are beyond the member's control per reference 

there is no authority to carry-over leave in

It may be noted that IAW

article 1050-070,

(b).

Proper management

Therefore,

4 .
reinstatement of 14.5 days leave at the end of FY 99.

fJ13OC  recommends disapproval of the petitioner's request for

Assistant Head, Pay and

Allowances Section  

(N130C)



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01233-01

    Original file (01233-01.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 N130C3/01U0198 of 9 May 2001, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04403-01

    Original file (04403-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 4403-01 10 October 200 1 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title Ilnited States Code, section 10 of the 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your proceedings application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08112-01

    Original file (08112-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. AC) uses the Last-In-First-Out (LIFO) rule to determine what IAW reference leave is charged when a member takes leave.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09832-06

    Original file (09832-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Under the regulations governing Special Leave Accrual (5LA), the maximum amount of leave that may be carried forward into succeeding fiscal years is the leave balance (not to exceed 90 days) as of the end of the SLA period. Enclosure (1) indicates a request for reinstatement of 5.5 days of leave the petitioner lost at the end of FY-06.3. As a result, the petitioner’s carried forward leave balance on 1 Oct 05 was 73.0 days.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03062-01

    Original file (03062-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD X 2 NAVY ANNE S WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP: ddj Docket No: 3062-01 5 September 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00375-05

    Original file (00375-05.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-memler panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 March 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02687-01

    Original file (02687-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. AC) uses the Last-In-First-Out (LIFO) rule to determine what IAW reference leave is charged when a member takes leave.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01509-01

    Original file (01509-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER which is attached. D.C. 20350-200 N 0 IN REPLY REFER TO 7220 Ser 9 May 2001 N130C/oiu0195 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: Assistant for BCNR Matters,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 00132-04

    Original file (00132-04.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 March 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06620-00

    Original file (06620-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing his failure of selection before the Fiscal Year (FY) 1999 Captain Selection Board; returning him to the Regular Marine Corps effective 1 November 1999; and changing the date of rank and effective date of his promotion to captain to reflect selection by the FY 1999 Captain Selection...