Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07210-01
Original file (07210-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENTOFTHE  NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
ANNEX

NAVY 

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

S

TRG
Docket No: 7210-01
10 July 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.

Your allegations of error and

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 9 July 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command, a copy of which
is enclosed.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice:
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.

In this connection the Board substantially

Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

The names and

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other-matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
ND

N A VY  PERSO

NNEL 

COMMA

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE

MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

1430
Ser  811
20 Nov 01

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL  

RECORDS  

(BCNR)

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters  

(PERS-OOXCB)

Subj 

:

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF
IS2

Ref:

(a) BUPERSINST 

1430.16E

Encl:

( 1 ) BCNR file  

#07210-01

Based on policy and guidelines established in reference

1 .
(a), enclosure (1) is returned without action.

did participate in the

cycle 168 examination.

which would occur between January

2.
September 2000,
advancement,
June 2001,
indicates her advancement date was 16 March 2001, with a time
in rate date of 1 
in her records.
this petition.

Ja'nuary  2001,
There is no correction to make regarding

A review of our records

not December 2000.

which is currently reflected

She was selected for

and



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03719-01

    Original file (03719-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430 SER which is attached. A requirement for advancement under the Accelerated As of when she was issued an advancement certificate, 2.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07510-01

    Original file (07510-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 September 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 29 October 2001 and 25 March 2002, copies of which are attached. Based on our review of the material provided, we find the following: a.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05907-01

    Original file (05907-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130D1/01~1407 19 Dee 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05907-01 with microfiche service record 1. Navy Recruiting Command and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06744-01

    Original file (06744-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 8 11 of 7 December 2001, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03362-01

    Original file (03362-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 862 of 16 August 2001, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06314-01

    Original file (06314-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01436-01

    Original file (01436-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03955-01

    Original file (03955-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2002. D.C. 20350.2000 Y S N IN REPLY REFER 542 0 N130Dl/ 6 Aug 01 TO OlU1198 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN Encl: (1) BCNR case file #03955-01 with microfiche service record The following provides comment and recommendation on Seaman 1. does not have an EB...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04627-01

    Original file (04627-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 200 1. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03147-01

    Original file (03147-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this regard, it is important Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV N AVY...