DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
v
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
LCC:ddj
Docket No: 3362-01
11 September 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 11 September 2001. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 862 of 16 August 2001, a copy of
which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In this regard, it is important
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
t
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 380550000
Y
5420
PERS-862
A@
162op1
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION
OF NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR)
Assistant for BCNR Matters
(PERS-OOZCB).
Via:
Subj:
‘1
Ref:
(a)
Assrstant for BCNR Matters 5420 PERS-OOZCB Memo of
17 Jul 01
(b) BUPERSINST
1430.16E
Encl:
(1) BCNR File
#03362-01
Per reference (a),
1.
are submitted concerning Petty Officer
the following comments and recommendations
case.
February 2000 (Cycle 066)
HMl had a Performance Mark (PMA) Error
Navywide
for
ional 75.5
Petty Office
it is determined that Petty Officer
2.
Advancement Examination
that has not been corrected to date.
records,
Cycle 066 was 3.67,
points on the
With the additional 75.5 points, Petty Officer
Multiple Score (FMS) computes to 174.33.
required for selection to
Final Multiple Score falls 25.75 points short-of being a
for advancement.
which would have given her
Navywide Advancement Examination
HMl is 200.08.
After
an a
The FMS that w
Petty Officer'
In view of the above,
3.
petition be denied.
we recommend Petty Officer
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05495-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02307-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 862 of 11 June 2001, a copy of which is attached. She was recalled to active duty for two The effective date of advancement to CTAl selected for advancement to February 1997 (Cycle 060) CTAl Navywide She was properly denied advancement to CTAl...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06557-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The FMS required for advancement to MS2 for that cycle was 181.58. in the March 1994 (Cycle 143) Navywide 3.-was credited with 4 award points for Cycle 143.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05917-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or iIi+justice. NRMSM for 1997 = 2 points; BS - Points are awarded based how well the member - There is no evidence that the Total...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00092-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The final multiple required for TAR advancement to PR1 is 208.58.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 08627-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ;ill material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. If a member is denied an opportunity to participate in a Navywide examination and if selected for advancement through participation in a subsequent examination, a member may request a backdated advancement. Therefore, no relief is recommended in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03211-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 862 of 11 June 2001, is attached your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory your a copy of which After...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08045-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 March 2001. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 862 undated, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9808627
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS Memorandum 1430 Ser 852/210 of 10 June 1999, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02107-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 7 July 2001. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Petty Officer was denied the opportunity to compete 3 for advancement in examination cycle 168, September 2000.