Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06314-01
Original file (06314-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

MEH: ddj
Docket No: 63 14-01
8 January 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 8 January 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Pers 8 11 of 14 November 2001, a copy of which
is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

WAVY  
rlLLlllDTOW  

S720  

PLRSOWWLL  COMMAND

IMTEDRITY  

DRIVE

TN 

28055-0000

116 0
PERS-81
14 Nov 0

1

1

MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHAIRMAN,
RECORD

S

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL

BCNR PETITION

ICO.
'i,,

Ref:

(a) SNM'S DD Form 149 dtd 18 Aug 01
(b) NAVADMIN  
(c) NAVADMIN  

050/00
049/01

In response to reference (a), recommend disapproval

1.
of the petitioner's request.

a.

The petitioner reenlisted on 11 August 2000
four years to have sufficient obliserve for the STAR
program.
reenlistment was 17 May 2001.
"A" SRB entitlement for the HM(8493) rate at the time the
petitioner reenlisted.

The petitioner's EAOS at the time of the

Reference 

(b) listed a zone

for

Reference(c),

released on 2 March 2001, changed
b.
"A" SRB entitlement for the HM(8493) award level from

zone
1 to 4.

C .

The petitioner request to change the reenlistment

date of 11 August 2000 to a later date closer to his
original EAOS of 17 May 2001 and fall under the new SRB
entitlement rates.

d.

Per ref  

(d), a member will be required to effect a

reenlistment within 6 months of the date of the STAR
authorization but the member graduated from the course
listed on the CSL and was advanced to E5 the effective date
of this graduation.

e.

Reference 

(b) requires the use of the  

paygrade  on

the date of discharge (10 August 2000) for computation of
SRB entitlement. Petitioner's SRB was correctly computed
for 
August 2000, he would not have been awarded the  
NEC nor advanced to E-5.

Had the member not reenlisted on 11

paygrade  E-4.

HM(8493)

Subj: BCNR PETITION  

484-02-4488

ICC

f.

Navy Personnel command/OPNAV cannot pr

Information pertaining to subsequent SRB  
after the NAVADMIN has been released.
petitioner could not have been counseled concerning
reference (c) prior to the reenlistment.
hindsight is not sufficient grounds to expunge the
11 August 2000 reenlistment as no error or injustice was
committed.

Therefore the

NAVADMIN's  until

The petitioner's

In view of the above,

2.
remain as is.

recommend the petitioner's record

This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use

3.
by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
Enclosure (1) is return

eenlistment Incentives Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08169-00

    Original file (08169-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend expunging the petitioner's Recommend effecting a This change Subj: BCNR PETITION IC This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06334-03

    Original file (06334-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner requests to have the SRB payment readjusted to reflect the 4.0 award level for the Diver NEC 5342.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05771-00

    Original file (05771-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. orders in June 2000 and was in a student status on 01 August 2000. d. The petitioner was advised that he...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02284-01

    Original file (02284-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY 5750 YlLLlllDTOW ,LRSOWWEL COMMAND IWTEQRITY DRIVE TN 38055-0000 1160 PERS-815 11 Jun 01 MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: Subj: Ref: PERS-OOZCB BCNR PETITION ICO SNM's DD...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05930-01

    Original file (05930-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1 160 PERS 81 attached. Reference (b) released on 30 April 1999 did not list with an effective date of 01 April 2000 a zone "B" SRB entitlement for the AMS(OOOO) rate at the time the petitioner reenlisted. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04291-00

    Original file (04291-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 October 2000. In this regard, it is important Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAW l IRSOWWLL COMMAND DRIVE IlTlDRltY 5720 YlLLlNDTOlT11 2805 5-0000 MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: PERS-OOZCB Subj: BCNR PETITION ICO 116 0 PERS-815 29 Aug 00 Ref: SNM's DD Form 149 dtd...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04056-02

    Original file (04056-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. d. The petitioner requests to cancel the extension agreement of 13 December 2001 and allow his OTEIP extension to June 2002 be established.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05392-06

    Original file (05392-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. Reference (c) provided a zone “A” SRB for NEC 8483 at the time the petitioner received orders to NEC 8483 training. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02121-01

    Original file (02121-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records Enclosure (1) is returned.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05254-01

    Original file (05254-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum I60 Pers 8 1 I attached. recommend the petitioner's record remain This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the 3.