Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07179-02
Original file (07179-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

JLP: ddj
Docket No: 7179-02
29 October 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 29 October 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 Ser
which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

 

N133D1000270  of 8 October 2002, a copy of

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly,  your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

OFFICE  OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATION
N

2000 NAVY PENTAGO

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20350.2000

Y

S

IN 

REPLY 

REFER 

TO

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL

RECORDS

- 

.

Via:

Subj:

Assistant for BCNR Matters  

(PERS-~~XCB)

Ref:

SECNAVINST 

7220.80E

‘9

Encl:

Docket Number 07179-02

1.

Forwarded, recommending disapproval.

,

On 06 July 1998 then First Class Petty Officer

2.
transferred to a non-submarine assignment with a Projected Rotation
Date (PRD) of July 2001 (September 2002 required for continued
entitlement to CONSUBPAY).
of October 1981, High Year Tenure
from member's ADSD, or October 2001 for Chief Gardner since he was
an E-6 at the time.
Service 
CONSUBPAY.
He executed a four month extension on or about 06 July
1998, ostensibly to obtain the necessary obligated service to match
making his SEAOS 19 July 2001.
his Soft EAOS  

With an Active Duty Service Date  
(HYT) for an E-6 was 20 years

(EAOS) was 19 March 2001 and he was not eligible for

At that time his Expiration of Obligated

(SEAOS) with his PRD,

(ADSD)

During his shore tour he did not have sufficient OBLISERVE to
3.
Additionally, he did not
allow him to be eligible for CONSUBPAY.
seek a HYT waiver to allow him to move his PRD out to a point that
would allow him to be eligible for CONSUBPAY.

On  06 July 1998, Chie

4 .
he would not receive CONSUBPAY until he signed a qualifying
extension.
upon his advancement to Chief Petty Officer, which started
CONSUBPAY for him.

He signed a qualifying extension on 15 September 2000,

signed  a page   13  acknowledgin

g

The intent of CONSUBPAY is to gain co
Chief

5.
from those Sailors who can do so.
action that would have enabled him to return to sea until he was
advanced to Chief Petty Officer and agreed to transfer back to sea.
quately compensate
At that time, his CONSUBPAY was
him.

nt to return to sea
did not take any

Program Manager



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03731-02

    Original file (03731-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2002. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. January 1978. member's ADSD, or January 2004 for EAOS is now 13 months past his HYT date. -Ten of the fourteen ast his PRD are months additional obligated service beyond his HYT date.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06118-02

    Original file (06118-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00858-06

    Original file (00858-06.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 May 2006. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. San Diego, CA for shore duty with a Projected Rotation Date (PRD) of December 2005. lAW Ref(a) to maintain his CONSUBPAY eligibility, he needed to extend/reenlist through February...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03815-06

    Original file (03815-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Members CONSUBPAY stopped upon transfer for not meeting the requirements of Ref(a).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05908-01

    Original file (05908-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,, In addition, the Board considered the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08243-02

    Original file (08243-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2003. Year Submarine Career Screening Gate Submarine Service Entry Date CONSUBPAY stopped on 8 February 2002. Per reference (a), reached his Petty Officer The Enlisted Master Record his actual total TOSS is 68 months.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02613-02

    Original file (02613-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 III II : M EH Docket No: 2613-02 9 July 2002 This is in reference to your application provisions of title IO of the Ilnitrtl States (:otle, section 1553. for correction 01‘ your naval record pursuant to the o!l 9 three-menlber panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive A session, considered your application were reviewed in accordance proceedings of this Board. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00734-01

    Original file (00734-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    OPSUBPAY is payable to active duty naval service officers and enlisted personnel when assigned to and serving in a submarine when CONSUBPAY eligibility criteria, paragraph 4, ‘are not met (see enclosure (2)). a. OPSUBPAY when attached for duty (ACC 100) to a submarine command staff: OPSUBPAY is payable on a month-to-month basis to individuals qualified in submarines while attached for duty (ACC 100) to submarine command staffs (enclosure (8)) provide&that . To satisfy ride time...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04291-00

    Original file (04291-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 October 2000. In this regard, it is important Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAW l IRSOWWLL COMMAND DRIVE IlTlDRltY 5720 YlLLlNDTOlT11 2805 5-0000 MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: PERS-OOZCB Subj: BCNR PETITION ICO 116 0 PERS-815 29 Aug 00 Ref: SNM's DD Form 149 dtd...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06973-01

    Original file (06973-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    30 October 2001 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNP memorandum 5420 Ser which is attached.