Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02613-02
Original file (02613-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 

NAVY 

ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

III 
II
: 

M EH 
Docket No: 2613-02
9 July 2002

This is in reference to your application  
provisions of title IO of the

Ilnitrtl 

 

States 

(:otle, section  

1553.

for correction  

01‘ your naval record pursuant to the

o!l 9 

three-menlber panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive

A 
session, considered your application  
were reviewed   in accordance  
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
Illelllor~lll(l~lll~  
opinion furnished by  
attached.

July 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice
and procedures applicable to the

In addition, the Board considered the advisory
PERS 

with administrative regulations

I May 2002, a copy of which is

4010 of 3 

5120 

NPC 

 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. You stated that when the  
agreement for 
provided any documentation to support this.
concurred with the   comments  contained in the advisory opinion.
has been denied. The  
request.

naliles and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon

“C” school and accelerated advancement was dropped. However, you have not

In this connection, the Board substantially

6YO program was changed to a  

SYO program the contract

Accordingly, your application

It is regretted that the circumstances of
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.

your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
  upon submission of new and material

 

Docket No. 2613-02

In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all
official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

5420
PERS 4010
31 MAY 02

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Via : Assistant  for Board for Correction of Naval Records Matters

(Pers-OOZCB)

Subj:

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

(BCNR) INQUIRY ICO

Issue 

:

is requesting to cancel 12 months of a 24 month

extension incurred through the AEF/FTG program.

:

Member Data  
ADSD:
EAOS:
SEAOS:
PRES 
PRD/RCVD:
PREV 
RCVD:

DUSTA:

DUSTA:

97JUNll
03JUNlO
03JUNlO

. USS SCRANTON (SSN 756)

03JAN/98NOVOl
SUBRONSP NOR OT
98JUL21

enlisted in the Navy under the  

6YO Advanced

In accordance with the MILPERSMAN 1510-030,
received advanced training and remained eligible for

accelerated advancement until he went to mast. MILPERSMAN article
states "if advanced training was received and the member has not
eligibility for advancement to E4 is
yet advanced to E4,
terminated and the 24 month extension of enlistment is not
canceled."

- The documenta
two years after,

submitted on the SECF program began
red the Navy and is not relevant.

Recommendation

:

cancellation.

s received t

sapproval of

efits of the AEF program.
request for extension

Subj:

Point of Contact
-YNCS(SW)

:

CNR) INQUIRY ICO

DSN: 882-2373

  or Comm:

 

(901)874-2373.

A-School Assignments  

(PERS-4010s)

) 

I USN

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07410-98

    Original file (07410-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This is in reference to your application provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. for correction of your naval record pursuant to the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 March 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03013-99

    Original file (03013-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05908-01

    Original file (05908-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,, In addition, the Board considered the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07735-98

    Original file (07735-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Recommendation: non-receipt of an official quota for DK A-school and non-receipt of striker designation from...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06036-01

    Original file (06036-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Encl: (1) (2) (3) DD Form 149 w/attachments NPC Subject’s naval record n~emorand~~n~ 5420 Pers 4010 of 24 September 2001 Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be 1. filed enclosure corrected to modify a 24 month extension. il!justice on 30 October 2001 and, pursuant to its Zsalman, and Ms. Hare, reviewed 3. Member executed the 24 month extension for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01606-11

    Original file (01606-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show execution of a 24 month extension to comply with, and receive the benefits of, the Advanced Electronics Field (AEF) Program. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01396-00

    Original file (01396-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    D.C. 20350-200 NAV Y S 0 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 Ser 14 June 2000 N130D/ OuO329 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS via: Assistant for BCNR Matters (Pers-OOZCB) Ref: (a) DODINST 1304.22 Encl: (1) BCNR File #01396-00 with microfiche service record The following p.rovides comment and recommendation on former 1. Petty Officer initial enlistment into the Navy was ay she signed an agreement and 3. on 1 June 1987. statement of understanding that by electing...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06122-02

    Original file (06122-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02553-08

    Original file (02553-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11458 14

    Original file (NR11458 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel, and issue an agreement to extend enlistment. at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above passes Tey } 4 It is certified that...