Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08243-02
Original file (08243-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP: ddj
Docket No: 8243-02
14 January 2003

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 14 January 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 Ser
of which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

 

N133D/000323 of 13 December 2002, a copy

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has   been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATION

2000 NAVY PENTAGO

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20350-200

  NAV Y

N

0

S

IN REPLY REFER TO

542 0
Ser 
DEC 1  3 2002
MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL

Nl33D/()(j0323

RECORDS

Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOXCB)

Via:

Subj:

OF

Ref:

(a) SECNAVINST 7220.803

Encl:

Docket Number 08243-02

1.

Forwarded, recommending disapproval.

On 29 January 2002, Petty Officer

2.
Year Submarine Career Screening Gate  
Submarine Service Entry Date  
CONSUBPAY stopped on 8 February 2002.
He earned 68 months Total
Operational Submarine Service (TOSS) by January 2002, four months
short of the required 72 months TOSS.
entitlement to CONSUBPAY stops at this point for any submarine
Sailor who did not have at least 72 months of TOSS upon reaching
his 12 YRGT.

12
(YRGT) date based on his
His

(SSED) of 29 January 1990.

Per reference (a),

reached his  

Petty Officer

The Enlisted Master Record  

his actual total TOSS is 68 months.

claims he is only one month of TOSS

3.
short for his 12 YRGT.
months TOSS and after conducting a TOSS audit IAW Ref (a) on his
career,
choice to shorten his PRD on the USS Newport News (SSN 750) from
May 2002 to May 2001 for Recruiting Duty Sea Credit.
transfer to shore duty early even after being counseled by Pers
403CM that he would miss his 12 YRGT   as indicated in the Enlisted
Master Record Notes Page.

Member made the

(EMR) shows 67

He chose to

4.
A thorough review of his career history indicates that he did
not have sufficient TOSS for continued entitlement to CONSUBPAY.
Reference (a) explicitly dis

insufficient TOSS.

Submarine Pay
Program Manager



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05186-02

    Original file (05186-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 Ser which is attached. reference (,a), entitlement to CONSUBPAY stops at this point for any submarine Sailor who did not have at least 72 months of TOSS upon reaching his 12 YRGT.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06118-02

    Original file (06118-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06973-01

    Original file (06973-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    30 October 2001 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNP memorandum 5420 Ser which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07179-02

    Original file (07179-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 October 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory N133D1000270 of 8 October 2002, a copy of After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. action that would have enabled him to return to sea until he...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08349-00

    Original file (08349-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FORCORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD X 2 NAVY ANNE S WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP: ddj Docket No: 8349-00 12 June 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03731-02

    Original file (03731-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2002. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. January 1978. member's ADSD, or January 2004 for EAOS is now 13 months past his HYT date. -Ten of the fourteen ast his PRD are months additional obligated service beyond his HYT date.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00858-06

    Original file (00858-06.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 May 2006. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. San Diego, CA for shore duty with a Projected Rotation Date (PRD) of December 2005. lAW Ref(a) to maintain his CONSUBPAY eligibility, he needed to extend/reenlist through February...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03815-06

    Original file (03815-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Members CONSUBPAY stopped upon transfer for not meeting the requirements of Ref(a).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06273-98

    Original file (06273-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 SER of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00734-01

    Original file (00734-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    OPSUBPAY is payable to active duty naval service officers and enlisted personnel when assigned to and serving in a submarine when CONSUBPAY eligibility criteria, paragraph 4, ‘are not met (see enclosure (2)). a. OPSUBPAY when attached for duty (ACC 100) to a submarine command staff: OPSUBPAY is payable on a month-to-month basis to individuals qualified in submarines while attached for duty (ACC 100) to submarine command staffs (enclosure (8)) provide&that . To satisfy ride time...