Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03731-02
Original file (03731-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

JLP:ddj
Docket No: 373 l-02
20 August 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 20 August 2002.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 Ser
which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

Your allegations of error and injustice

 

N133D/000179 of 26 JULY 2002, a copy of

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATION

DEPARTMENT OF THE
2000 NAVY PENTAGO

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20350.2000

  NAV Y

S

N

IN 

REPLY 

REFER T

O

542 0
Ser 
N133D/ 
Jut-  
6 
2 

2002

Cfia:';$j

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL

RECORDS

Assistant for BCNR Matters  

(PERS-OOXCB)

Via:

Subj:

Ref:

SECNAVINST 

7220.80E

Encl:

Docket Number 03731-02

1.

Forwarded, recommending disapproval.

On 01 August 2001

(PRD) of September 2003. (November 2004 required for continued

2.
transferred to a non-submarine assignment with a
Date 
entitlement to CONSUBPAY).
Obligated Service  
eligible for CONSUBPAY.
on or about 09 January 2002,
obligated service for entitlement to CONSUBPAY, making his Soft
EAOS 26 February 2005.

(EAOS) was 26 September 2003 and he was not

He executed a seventeen month extension

ostensibly to obtain the necessary

At that time his Expiration of

Projected Rotation

High Year Tenure

Active Duty Service Date  

3 .
January 1978.
member's ADSD, or January 2004 for
EAOS is now 13 months past his HYT   date.  -Ten of the fourteen
ast his PRD are
months additional obligated service
beyond his HYT date.
been selected for advancement to  

Additionally, 

Mds~&~~~

"--.

1

(ADSD)  is

-8 is 26 years from

has not

Program Manager



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07179-02

    Original file (07179-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 October 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory N133D1000270 of 8 October 2002, a copy of After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. action that would have enabled him to return to sea until he...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00858-06

    Original file (00858-06.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 May 2006. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. San Diego, CA for shore duty with a Projected Rotation Date (PRD) of December 2005. lAW Ref(a) to maintain his CONSUBPAY eligibility, he needed to extend/reenlist through February...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06118-02

    Original file (06118-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03815-06

    Original file (03815-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Members CONSUBPAY stopped upon transfer for not meeting the requirements of Ref(a).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08243-02

    Original file (08243-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2003. Year Submarine Career Screening Gate Submarine Service Entry Date CONSUBPAY stopped on 8 February 2002. Per reference (a), reached his Petty Officer The Enlisted Master Record his actual total TOSS is 68 months.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05186-02

    Original file (05186-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 Ser which is attached. reference (,a), entitlement to CONSUBPAY stops at this point for any submarine Sailor who did not have at least 72 months of TOSS upon reaching his 12 YRGT.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00734-01

    Original file (00734-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    OPSUBPAY is payable to active duty naval service officers and enlisted personnel when assigned to and serving in a submarine when CONSUBPAY eligibility criteria, paragraph 4, ‘are not met (see enclosure (2)). a. OPSUBPAY when attached for duty (ACC 100) to a submarine command staff: OPSUBPAY is payable on a month-to-month basis to individuals qualified in submarines while attached for duty (ACC 100) to submarine command staffs (enclosure (8)) provide&that . To satisfy ride time...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06973-01

    Original file (06973-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    30 October 2001 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNP memorandum 5420 Ser which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07306-02

    Original file (07306-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. change will give the member an EAOS of 27 September 2003. recommend the petitioner's enlistment This Additionally, this change will allow the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05908-01

    Original file (05908-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,, In addition, the Board considered the...