Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05908-01
Original file (05908-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

MEH:ddj
Docket No: 5908-01
30 October 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title  

IJnited States Code, section  

10 of the  

1552.

on 

30 October 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice

A three-member panel of the Board   for Correction   of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application  
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to
 
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes,,
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 5420 Pers 4010 of 1 October 2001, a copy of which
attached.

regulations and policies.

the

is

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
submitteld was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
evidence 
8connection,  the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
injustice. In this  
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
ofticial naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
when applying for a correction of an  
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

5420
PERS 4010
01 OCT 01

MEMORANDUM  FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Assistant  for Board for Correction of Naval Records Matters
(Pers-OOZCB)

Via:

Subj:

Issue:
HT2 
extension incurred through the ATF Program.

Carruth  

:LS requesting to cancel 12 months of the 24-month

Member Data:
ADSD:
EAOS:
SEAOS:
PRES 
PRD/RCVD:
PREV 
RCVD:

DUSTA:

DUSTA:

96JUN27
02JUN26
02JUN26
USS SAMUEL B ROBERTS FFG-58
OlOCT/99MAR23
USS EMORY S LAND AS-39
97JAN06

Carruth  enlisted in the Navy on 27 June 1996 for four years

Background:
- HT2 
under the 6Y0 ATF Program.
successful completion of HT "A" school.
"C" school in February 2002 before following on to his ultimate
duty station in Ingleside TX.

He was advanced to E-4 upon

He is scheduled to go to

- HT2

extension was executed on 26 June 2000.

Recommendation:
s request to cancel 12
- Recommend disapproval of HT
as received all the
months of 
benefits of the ATF Program and his extension has already been
executed.

hi,s  extension.

HT2

Point of Contact:
-YNCS(SW) 

*

DSN:

882-2373 or Comm:  

(901)874-2373.  

’

Rating Assignment
A-School Assignments  

Officer

USN

(PERS-4010s)



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02613-02

    Original file (02613-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 III II : M EH Docket No: 2613-02 9 July 2002 This is in reference to your application provisions of title IO of the Ilnitrtl States (:otle, section 1553. for correction 01‘ your naval record pursuant to the o!l 9 three-menlber panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive A session, considered your application were reviewed in accordance proceedings of this Board. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03013-99

    Original file (03013-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07410-98

    Original file (07410-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This is in reference to your application provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. for correction of your naval record pursuant to the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 March 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07735-98

    Original file (07735-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Recommendation: non-receipt of an official quota for DK A-school and non-receipt of striker designation from...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04544-01

    Original file (04544-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. GTEP IS A RECRUITMENT PROGRAM DESIGNED TO $2K ENLISTMENT BONUS TO BE PAID THE GTEP CANDIDATES WILL BE RECRUITED TO AN "A" SCHOOL FIELD INSTEAD EACH GTEP "A" SCHOOL FIELD IS COMPRISED OF 2. WHILE THIS MAY NOT ALWAYS BE THE CASE, EVERY...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04197-01

    Original file (04197-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. THE $2K ENLISTMENT BONUS TO BE PAID GTEP IS A RECRUITMENT PROGRAM DESIGNED TO GTEP CANDIDATES WILL BE RECRUITED TO AN "A" SCHOOL FIELD INSTEAD EACH GTEP "A" SCHOOL FIELD IS COMPRISED OF A GTEP 2. WITH COMMAND INVOLVEMENT VIA GTEP RECRUITS SHOULD RETURN TO WHILE THIS MAY NOT ALWAYS BE THE...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06036-01

    Original file (06036-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Encl: (1) (2) (3) DD Form 149 w/attachments NPC Subject’s naval record n~emorand~~n~ 5420 Pers 4010 of 24 September 2001 Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be 1. filed enclosure corrected to modify a 24 month extension. il!justice on 30 October 2001 and, pursuant to its Zsalman, and Ms. Hare, reviewed 3. Member executed the 24 month extension for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06023-01

    Original file (06023-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 6023-01 30 October 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel a 24 month extension. 0 Acting...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07621-00

    Original file (07621-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 Ser Pers 402 of 3 1 January 2001, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. was approved for Star re- “C” school sometime during that 8 March 1996 SNM requested and was granted an OTEIP extension On USS Dubuque.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00935

    Original file (ND01-00935.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation Only the service and medical records were reviewed, as the applicant did not provide additional documentation for the Board to consider. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant’s issue states: “I was not an alcohol rehabilitation failure. The applicant requested the reason for discharge be changed from Alcohol abuse-...