Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05602-02
Original file (05602-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370.510

0

JRE
Docket No: 5602-02
22 October 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 10 October 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordanct with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 25 July
2002, a copy of which is attached.

Documentary material considered by the Board

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.

Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the
applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

Y

NAVY PERSONNEL   COMMAN D

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE

MILLINGTON TN 38055-000

0

7220
PERS-82B
25 July  2002

MEMORANDUM FOR SPECIAL ASSISTANT FOR BCNR MATTERS (PERS-OOZCB)

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

REVIEW OF N

(a) BCNR MEMORANDUM 5420 PERS-OOZCB of 3 Jul 02

(2) Memorandum response to Congressional Inquiry dtd

ing response to 1150
Ser 

OlC/O114  dtd 4 Jun 02

(1) Chief of

complaint

20 May 02

Naval records

Per reference (a), a review  

1.
were made. Enclosures (1) and (2) are previous re
As indicated in the responses,

request.

of'

allowed to remain on active duty, after his
Fleet Reserve date of 31 October 2001, to complete surgery and
allow sufficient time for a medical board to be received by the
Central Physical Evaluation Board (CPEB).
physician and his superiors determined that his condition did
not warrant a medical board and would not overcome the
presumption of fitness determination as required by SECNAVINST
1850.

The attending

initia

I may be reached at (901)   874-3245  for any further

2.
inquiries into this matter.

By direction



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01504-02

    Original file (01504-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. case it was due to General...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06174-02

    Original file (06174-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by 5he Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00877-02

    Original file (00877-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ’s naval record A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Chief Petty enrolled Ms. (SBP) .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01722-02

    Original file (01722-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 8 1 attached. recommend the petitioner's request This is an advisory memorandum to reference 4.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05362-02

    Original file (05362-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting session, considered your application oil were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's record...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05958-02

    Original file (05958-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06342-02

    Original file (06342-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's record remain This is an advisory memorandum to reference 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04056-02

    Original file (04056-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. d. The petitioner requests to cancel the extension agreement of 13 December 2001 and allow his OTEIP extension to June 2002 be established.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05178-02

    Original file (05178-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD NAVY ANNEX 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 S MEH:ddj Docket No: 1 October 2002 5 178-02 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. The petitioner discharged paygrade was E-5. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05241-02

    Original file (05241-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. zone the petitioner's reenlistment. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.