Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05958-02
Original file (05958-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

LCC:ddj
Docket No:  
8 October 2002

5958-02

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section

1552.

 

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 8 October 2002.
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 5420 Pers 80 of 9 September 2002, a copy of which is
attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

Your allegations of error and injustice were

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-000

0

Y

5420
PERS-80
() 

> 

i ’-y 
-- ‘.   ““i”s

‘

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOZCB)

Subj:

REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATION IN CASE OF

Ref:

(a) Chief Naval Personnel Letter dtd 22

Serial 

85/006

 

Ott 99

Encl:

(1) BCNR File 05958-02

1.

Forwarded,

recommending disapproval.

LCDR

2.
election by the FY-00 Commander Medical
Corps Promotion Selection Board was reviewed by the Office of
Navy Judge Advocate General and was declared a legal nullity per
reference (a).
to be considered by the board, your selection has no legal
basis.

your petition is not warranted.

since you were not lawfully eligible

Once again,

Therefore,

Progression Division

leer Caree



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01836-02

    Original file (01836-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05388-02

    Original file (05388-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Inactive) status when you were Sl (Standby-Reserve Active) status on 6 August 1996, as you had expressed no The Board found it would not have been appropriate for cognizant naval authorities to bring up the possibility of transferring you to S2 (Standby Reserve transferred to interest in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03638-02

    Original file (03638-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    following comments and recommendation concerning request that her date of transfer to Standby Reserve-Inactive (USNR-S2) status be changed from 31 August 2000 to 1997 and all failures of selection that date be removed. After her release from active duty, she entered the Individual Ready Reserve the Naval Reserve. Ready Reserve) are required by law to be considered by promotion boards, regardless of their active participation.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01576-02

    Original file (01576-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01504-02

    Original file (01504-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. case it was due to General...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02243-01

    Original file (02243-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ~ l l members of the Ready Reserve (including the Individual Ready Reserve) are required by law to be considered by promotion boards, whether or not they are actively participating. Per Title 10, U.S. Code, Chapter 1407, a lieutenant commander who has at least twice failed of selection and has completed 20 years of commissioned service must transfer to the Retired Reserve, if eligible, or be discharged. 0 was notified, per reference (c) , that he had become subject to the attrition...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07562-02

    Original file (07562-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You your commander date of rank from 1 November 1995 to 1 November 1998. record pursuant to the requested adjustment of A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05575-02

    Original file (05575-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The report in question is a Periodic/Regular report. c. We cannot administratively remove the fitness report in question and replace it with the report provided with the member material to fitness reports already on file, not replace them.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03731-02

    Original file (03731-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2002. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. January 1978. member's ADSD, or January 2004 for EAOS is now 13 months past his HYT date. -Ten of the fourteen ast his PRD are months additional obligated service beyond his HYT date.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08507-01

    Original file (08507-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 June 2002. The Board does not grant the naval flight officer (NFO) designator to an officer who has never held it, as they consider this a matter for cognizant naval authorities. He was promoted to the rank of Commander in November 2000 and has completed more than 18 years of qualifying service towards retirement.