Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08823-02
Original file (08823-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

MEH : ddj
Docket No: 8823-02
17 December 2002

This is in reference to your
provisions of title 10 of the

application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of t Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
cation on 17 December 2002. Your allegations of error and
session, considered your
ordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
injustice were reviewed i
to the proceedings of thi
rd. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
h all material submitted in support thereof,  your naval record and
your application, together
applicable statutes, regulat
opinion furnished by NPC
which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory
l/467 of 20 November 2002, a copy of

morandum 1160 Ser 8 1 

After careful and consci
evidence submitted was ins
injustice. In this connectio
the advisory opinion. AC
the members of the panel

n of the entire record, the Board found that the
cient to establish the existence of probable material error or
the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
ingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of

ill be furnished upon request.

circ
It is regretted that the 
You are entitled to have th
evidence or other matter
to keep in mind that a pr
when applying for a 
corr
demonstrate the existence

stances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
oard reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
eviously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
tion of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,

on of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

C

ZPARTMENT  OF THE NAV’,

NAVY PERSONNEL  COMMAND
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE

1160
Ser 
811/467
20 Nov 2002

MEMORANDUM FOR 

CHAIRM

J, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

Via:

PERS-OOZCB

Subj:

BCNR PETITION

10

Ref:

(a) SNM'S DD 
(b) OPNAVINST

Fm

:m 149 dtd 13 Sep 02
.60.6A

Encl:

(1) BCNR File

1.
In response to re
petitioner's request.

xence (a), recommend disapproval to the

The petitioner di

2 .
September  2000 after
enlisted in the U. S.

:harged from the U. S. Marine Corps on 21
_ years of active service.
The petitioner
Javy on 22 September 2000 for four years.

The petitioner at
3 .
completion of LN ‘A"

ained the  
chool training.

Legalman 

(LN) rate via successful

re
The petitioner 
4.
the LN rate based on
Per reference  
(b), 
wk
service for more 
thar
will be eligible for
from the U. S. Marine
er
broken service SRB  

"C" SRB entitlement for

uests to receive a zone 
er four year enlistment of 21 September 2000.
n an enlisted member separate from active Naval
24 hours but less than four years the member
roken service SRB.
The petitioner separated
Corps, therefore she is ineligible to receive a
itlement.

In  view of the  

ak

ve, recommend the petitioner's record remain as

5.
is.

6 . This is an adviso
Board for correction
returned.

r memorandum to reference (a)
,f Naval Records  
(BCNR) only.

for the use by the
Enclosure (1) is

Reenlistment Incentives Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06787-07

    Original file (06787-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/547 dtd 28 Nov 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner reenlisted for six years on 02 October 2000 and received a zone ‘B” SRB incentive. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08159-00

    Original file (08159-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06172-02

    Original file (06172-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD Y S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 MEH: ddj Docket No: 6172-02 13 November 2002 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. petitioner's request.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05210-02

    Original file (05210-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05127-03

    Original file (05127-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner was selected to the STA-21 officer program in October 2001. The petitioner requests to receive SRB offered in reference (b) based on the reenlistment of 19 July 2002.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07191-02

    Original file (07191-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The petitioner were issued orders on 20 February 2001 from the Enlisted Personnel Management Management Center New Orleans, LA to The return to active duty for disenrollment from petitioner reenlisted on 10 July 2001 for six years and received a zone "B" SRB entitlement for NEC 3354. the' NROTC Program. d. The petitioner request to receive all SRB installments and "C" School for the previous reenlistment prior to entering guaranteed the BOOST Program. However, the member is In view of the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08756-01

    Original file (08756-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner reenlisted on 02 January 2001 for four "C" SRB entitlement for the The petitioner received 47 months...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00177-03

    Original file (00177-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05178-02

    Original file (05178-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD NAVY ANNEX 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 S MEH:ddj Docket No: 1 October 2002 5 178-02 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. The petitioner discharged paygrade was E-5. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06174-02

    Original file (06174-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by 5he Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.