Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03083-01
Original file (03083-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X

2 NAVY ANNE

S

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

MEH:ddj
Docket No: 3083-01
24 July 2001

This is in reference to your application for ‘correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
Your allegations of error and injustice
session, considered your application on 24 July 2001.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 PERS 815 of 26 June 
is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

2001,-a copy of which

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

WAVY 
5720  
HlLLlnDtOl

PERIOWWEL  
INT~DRITY  DRIVE

COMYAWD

 

TN 

3805  5-0000

1160
PERS-815
26 Jun 01

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN,

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Subj:

Ref:

PERS-OOZCB

ICO

SNM's  DD Form 149 dtd 19 Mar 01

(a) 
(b) NAVADMIN 

049/01

Encl:

(1) BCNR File

In response to reference (a),

1.
petitioner's request.

recommend disapproval of the

a.

The petitioner reenlisted on 16 March 2001 for six years
SRB entitlement for the ETSS(OOOO) rate

and received a zone "A"
with an award level of 6.0.

b.

The petitioner requests to receive the zone "A" SRB

entitlement with an award level of 6.5 based on NEC 14N0 vice the
ETSS rate.
entitlement.

Reference (b) list the  

ETSS(14XX)  rate/NEC for SRB

14Xx)  identifies
CM, EB, EM, EP,
(b)
Reference 

Per reference (b) submarine NECS (ETSS  

14BF,  BG,

FA, HB, HH, JA, RM, RO, TM, TO, and ZA NECS.

ETSS%OM  sailors and includes all ETSS  
ET,
did not list the 14N0 as an available NEC for SRB entitlements.
Therefore the petitioner is not eligible to receive the zone "A"
SRB entitlement based on the 14XX NEC.
2.
remain as is.
3.
by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR)
Enclosure (1) is returned.

This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use

recommend the petitioner's record

In view of the above,

only.

USN

eenlistment Incentives Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05490-01

    Original file (05490-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum which is attached. Per reference (b), school or "C" C .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03259-02

    Original file (03259-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 mh MEH: Docket No: 9 July 2002 3259-02 Dear This is in reference to your application provisions of title 10 of the Ilnitctl States Code, section 1552. iOr correcticm 01‘ your naval record pursuant to the ot‘ the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive panel three-nlember- A session, considered your application were reviewed in accordance with proceedings of this Board. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08169-00

    Original file (08169-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend expunging the petitioner's Recommend effecting a This change Subj: BCNR PETITION IC This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00896-01

    Original file (00896-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. petitioner's Executive Officer denied the request for NEC 2735. reference (c) does not indicate if NEC 2735 was e. PERS-815 does not have the authorization to determine the petitioner's eligibility for NEC 2735 upon the release of reference (b).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02695-01

    Original file (02695-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. bv the Board for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01519-01

    Original file (01519-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08414-00

    Original file (08414-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 March 2001. recommend no change to the The petitioner and received the zone reenlisted on 09 August 1999 for four years "B" SRB maximum of $30K for the FC rate. recommend the petitioner's record remain This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (1) is returned.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03207-01

    Original file (03207-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 1 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Enclosure (1) is returned.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03896-00

    Original file (03896-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06342-02

    Original file (06342-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's record remain This is an advisory memorandum to reference 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.